He's not a great fit for the way Pike plays, and I was one of his biggest critics, but we definitely still wanted him and could have used him this year. Would have allowed us to never see Fall, Dortch could have played some 4, and it would have given this team someone who could score.Say what you want about this team and all of their shortcomings...but we give up WAY less wide open drives/layups than last year. Lathan is just not a good fit for this program.
He's not a great fit for the way Pike plays, and I was one of his biggest critics, but we definitely still wanted him and could have used him this year. Would have allowed us to never see Fall, Dortch could have played some 4, and it would have given this team someone who could score.
Yeah put another way, he likely cost at least double what we’re paying Ogbole and he would not have helped us win more games. Of course we’d rather have him than Ware or Fall. I would take him in place of both but that doesn’t say much.sure i mean if he stayed you'd like to think he'd be better defensively in year 2 of the system...
but at the price he was rumored to get and our budget...we're good here.
We must have very different definitions of good.... We are so far from having anything in the program as good, except maybe some good kids.sure i mean if he stayed you'd like to think he'd be better defensively in year 2 of the system...
but at the price he was rumored to get and our budget...we're good here.
Especially when that team isn’t even all that good. They just lost to Seattle…. With a 3rd string center getting paid north of 800k.Hard to win when your competition's 3rd guy makes more than your starters...by a lot.
I think he was just trying to say “we’re good” in the sense that while the staff made a lot of mistakes, not prioritizing an allocation to pay Lathan the 800k+ he required wasn’t one of them.We must have very different definitions of good.... We are so far from having anything in the program as good, except maybe some good kids.
Guess that depends on what Fall got paid, but I do agree giving Lathan 1/4 of our budget would be malpracticeI think he was just trying to say “we’re good” in the sense that while the staff made a lot of mistakes, not prioritizing an allocation to pay Lathan the 800k+ he required wasn’t one of them.
LOL...obviously not saying we are good at the 5 or anywhere for that matter...We must have very different definitions of good.... We are so far from having anything in the program as good, except maybe some good kids.
I think this is pretty far off base. Paul left mostly because his role at RU was going to change - less play at PG.
Guess that depends on what Fall got paid, but I do agree giving Lathan 1/4 of our budget would be malpractice
Bc it is completely falseNobody wants to believe this. Thanks.
sure, show your facts. actions and timing speak volumes unless you can refute them with such facts. i'll be waiting with others.Bc it is completely false
No it doesn’t depend on that. We shouldn’t have paid Fall anything - clearly that was on the long list of mistakes I referred to but it was not a matter of picking Fall to replace Lathan. We don’t know specifics but a center who didn’t see the floor at 2 prior stops clearly had to cost a lot less than a center who played 25+ mpg as a frosh at Rutgers. If we paid Lathan, we probably couldn’t have also afforded to keep Dylan Grant here.
sure, show your facts. actions and timing speak volumes unless you can refute them with such facts. i'll be waiting with others.
Why does someone who didnt see the floor have to cost less? We have people in a TJ Powers thread talking about how much was spent to get him, he didnt see much of the floor at his prior stops. No one knows what anyone paid for these guys. Agree that Fall shouldn't have cost much, that doesn't mean he didn't.No it doesn’t depend on that. We shouldn’t have paid Fall anything - clearly that was on the long list of mistakes I referred to but it was not a matter of picking Fall to replace Lathan. We don’t know specifics but a center who didn’t see the floor at 2 prior stops clearly had to cost a lot less than a center who played 25+ mpg as a frosh at Rutgers. If we paid Lathan, we probably couldn’t have also afforded to keep Dylan Grant here.
Why does someone who didnt see the floor have to cost less? We have people in a TJ Powers thread talking about how much was spent to get him, he didnt see much of the floor at his prior stops. No one knows what anyone paid for these guys. Agree that Fall shouldn't have cost much, that doesn't mean he didn't.
"Paying Lathan means losing Grant" seems highly unlikely.
According to Richie, the staff had 750k each for 3 transfers.
Lathan could easily be taking one of those spots at 800k
Hell give him the money for 2 spots. Hypothetically - not that he deserved it.
Seems there would have been no impact on Grant or anyone else.
I think people are severely underestimating how much Francis, Buchanan and especially Fall are getting.
The money had to go somewhere
Why does someone who didnt see the floor have to cost less? We have people in a TJ Powers thread talking about how much was spent to get him, he didnt see much of the floor at his prior stops. No one knows what anyone paid for these guys. Agree that Fall shouldn't have cost much, that doesn't mean he didn't.
This has always been my assumption (rightly or wrongly).
Pike brought in a 5th year pure PG Noah Fernandes presumably to compete with Mulcahy as the lead/starting PG.
At minimum a 1a/1b situation.
Noah was too small to be on the court with Mulcahy and not have the ball.
If Mulcahy was pushed more off ball, he's now competing with Cam Spencer, Simpson, Mag, Hyatt and "elite" shooting recruit Griffiths for time.
His minutes (32.4mpg the prior year - 2nd behind Caleb) and role was clearly going to be diminished.
The irony is that Noah and Gavin and Simpson weren't good.
Cam left.
Mag bailed on the season.
So if Paul stayed, his role wouldn't have dropped much, if at all.
His replacement JWill ended up leading the team in scoring.
I never said mistake, I said we wanted him back. I also said giving him 1/4 of our budget would have been malpractice. Yes, whatever we paid Fall was a waste, but IF it was close to Lathan's ask (and I could see Pike preferring to spend on a "defensive" guy), who would you rather have right now?Whatever we paid Fall was a waste of money because he can’t help at all. But he was picked up at the end of the cycle with whatever remaining funds we had left. His addition had nothing to do with Lathan which was an early cycle decision made at the time when we would have presumably been working out the details to keep Dylan Grant, Ogbole, J Mike, Dortch and deciding not to keep Jordan, Lathan, etc. we don’t know what anyone cost us, but I don’t think replacing Lathan with any of these guys on the roster would be helpful, and I’m reasonably confident Lathan cost a lot more than all of them so no, we didn’t make a “mistake” in letting him leave. No way.
Their average min per wasnt all that different, like 5 and 8 or something.I’m not sure how you can really compare. Baye Fall checked in to only a total of only 13 games in two prior seasons. It’s one thing to not earn much time - quite another to be so lost that coaches give up on even trying to get you experience for development purposes.
Their average min per wasnt all that different, like 5 and 8 or something.
Sadly there’s zero chance he got less than 250k.
The second it became legal to pay players, a market was established for every level player. We just don’t have the transparency to understand it. Simply put - market value is dictated by the importance of winning, being competitive and even simply fielding a team for a particular sport. For each school, these considerations are what drives spending decisions for programs in the long run. All of these things are in turn driven by how much the fans care about these things which is reflected in ticket sales, team apparel sales, TV viewing and a number of other direct and indirect revenue sources for the program.The fact that we're paying any of these players anything more than tuition/room/board is horrifying to me. And then to think it's 100s of thousands of dollars makes me want to vomit. There isn't a player on our roster worth anything near that kind of money. The downward spiral is in full force. We had a couple of fun years with Geo, Ron, etc....but is so far in the rear view mirror and now we're paying guys to suck at basketball. Stop the ride and let me off.
That’s not what happened and it had nothing to with playing time. Paul was going to get his 32+ minutes a game with the ball in his hand if he stayed and he knew that. His role wasn’t going to be diminished at all. I had a long conversation with someone who knows Paul very well.This has always been my assumption (rightly or wrongly).
Pike brought in a 5th year pure PG Noah Fernandes presumably to compete with Mulcahy as the lead/starting PG.
At minimum a 1a/1b situation.
Noah was too small to be on the court with Mulcahy and not have the ball.
If Mulcahy was pushed more off ball, he's now competing with Cam Spencer, Simpson, Mag, Hyatt and "elite" shooting recruit Griffiths for time.
His minutes (32.4mpg the prior year - 2nd behind Caleb) and role was clearly going to be diminished.
The irony is that Noah and Gavin and Simpson weren't good.
Cam left.
Mag bailed on the season.
So if Paul stayed, his role wouldn't have dropped much, if at all.
His replacement JWill ended up leading the team in scoring.
Sadly, some bag chasers do stink around.Lathan is the classic example of a kid who will make money but get hurt because NIL. If he stayed here Pike would’ve made him a better defender and he would’ve played a lot of minutes. By the time he was a senior he would’ve been an impact B1G player. But he chased the bag. Coaches now spend so much time trying to get 6-10 new guys to play together (for one year) that they don’t have the time to dedicate to develop a kid for years 2-3 in the program. They also know bag chasers won’t stink around so there’s considerably less incentive to find the time.
Chol off the benchDerek, Lathan, Jeremiah, Gavin, Antwone vs Current Starting Five
Close, imo.
The market is not rational. Players at the level we have are not worth a dime of NIL or revenue sharing. Just because we are allowed to pay players doesn't mean we should. This is absolutely an irrational market and it cannot be sustainable. Fans will lose interest when ****** basketball players are being paid six figures to suck and lose badly. We have a horrible product...nobody wants to pay for that and we'll see attendance at games fall...viewership on TV fall...and donor activity fall. The whole premise of paying guys to play crap ball is ridiculous. And who would pay Lathan Somerville $700k to suck at basketball. Guy sucks.The second it became legal to pay players, a market was established for every level player. We just don’t have the transparency to understand it. Simply put - market value is dictated by the importance of winning, being competitive and even simply fielding a team for a particular sport. For each school, these considerations are what drives spending decisions for programs in the long run. All of these things are in turn driven by how much the fans care about these things which is reflected in ticket sales, team apparel sales, TV viewing and a number of other direct and indirect revenue sources for the program.
100% true! He was being moved off the ball into a point forward role. Just as he was at the end of the seasonNot true
A point forward isn't really off the ball though, that's only an acknowledgement he couldn't guard ones and some twos.100% true! He was being moved off the ball into a point forward role. Just as he was at the end of the season
I said “in the long run”. Markets may be irrational in the short term but they generally correct over time.The market is not rational. Players at the level we have are not worth a dime of NIL or revenue sharing. Just because we are allowed to pay players doesn't mean we should. This is absolutely an irrational market and it cannot be sustainable. Fans will lose interest when ****** basketball players are being paid six figures to suck and lose badly. We have a horrible product...nobody wants to pay for that and we'll see attendance at games fall...viewership on TV fall...and donor activity fall. The whole premise of paying guys to play crap ball is ridiculous. And who would pay Lathan Somerville $700k to suck at basketball. Guy sucks.
I believe that is really far from the truth.Say what you want about this team and all of their shortcomings...but we give up WAY less wide open drives/layups than last year. Lathan is just not a good fit for this program.
Not a clue!That’s not what happened and it had nothing to with playing time. Paul was going to get his 32+ minutes a game with the ball in his hand if he stayed and he knew that. His role wasn’t going to be diminished at all. I had a long conversation with someone who knows Paul very well.
Washington had a well known NYC basketball guy reach out to someone who Paul knows and trusts (I am not naming names). A meeting was set up in NYC late in the portal cycle, and that’s why the timing was late. Paul and the NYC basketball guy discussed the offer from Washington.
When Paul was supposed to fly out to Washington he really didn’t want to but it was too late to go back on the offer and come back go RU.
Anyway- big money gets thrown around to 18-22 year olds, and most of them didn’t grow up with $$ and it’s a tough decision to make.