Politi At it Again

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,220
17,902
97
Don't ever think this guy or his employer "roots" for Rutgers. On the even of homecoming and launch of the Rutgers NIL brand, Steve runs a hit piece complaining about the $194K spent on a search firm to find the AD that was not used to find the AD.

Who gives a flying duck? By early returns, President Tate's power move was a home run. But as always, when things start looking good for Rutgers, they come out with the pitchforks.

Earlier in the week, Steve tried to derail Greg's presser when asking about Franklin, and then playing down the NIL brand launch as having been already tried. Greg cut him off at the knees both times.

Yeah, you picked the wrong profession, Steve. You suck at your job.



why would he root for Rutgers? Teams that cover teams aren’t supposed to “root” for the team they cover…
 

King of S

All-Conference
Sep 20, 2017
3,444
2,817
113
We actually probably saved a ton of money by hiring Zinn , instead of a search firm identified candidate. I would assume the search firm also would’ve been paid a large amount for the hiring of one of their candidates (usually based on a % of their salary in my world at least).

so in reality headline should read “RU saves multi six figures while landing an A+ candidate thanks to new prez!”
Still paid the search firm 200k for zero results.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
89,222
87,176
113
why would he root for Rutgers? Teams that cover teams aren’t supposed to “root” for the team they cover…
You overlooked "roots" was in quotes. But since everyone is extra salty after yesterday, I changed it to "objectively covers". The point of the post is NJ.com and Politi take every opportunity to take digs at Rutgers and portray Rutgers in a negative light. Everything else about Politi's pot stirring X post and story has been hashed out above. Politi is a drama queen and attention *****.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tru2ru1

bigmatt718

Heisman
Mar 11, 2013
15,956
22,468
113
You overlooked "roots" was in quotes. But since everyone is extra salty after yesterday, I changed it to "objectively covers". The point of the post is NJ.com and Politi take every opportunity to take digs at Rutgers and portray Rutgers in a negative light. Everything else about Politi's pot stirring X post and story has been hashed out above. Politi is a drama queen and attention *****.
Sports media hates the sports teams they cover. Look at Philly with WIP. When the Eagles won their SB last year they had their worst ratings in a long time. Remember this: No one hates Philly sports more than Philly sports media, and no one hates Philly sports media more than Philly sports fans. Guarantee it's the same with Nj.com or WFAN with NY sports.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,220
17,902
97
You overlooked "roots" was in quotes. But since everyone is extra salty after yesterday, I changed it to "objectively covers". The point of the post is NJ.com and Politi take every opportunity to take digs at Rutgers and portray Rutgers in a negative light. Everything else about Politi's pot stirring X post and story has been hashed out above. Politi is a drama queen and attention *****.

I’ve had this discussion alot in the past. I can guarantee you nj.com wishes Rutgers was better. Better team = more clicks = better coverage = more money

But yes. When Rutgers is doing bad - they’ll amplify it. When Rutgers is doing good - see the first three weeks of the season - they also amplify it. That’s they’d job.
 

RUBlackout

All-American
Mar 11, 2008
10,950
7,066
113
Crazy part is that everyone wants to rag on them yet you are likely spot on with this post. They may actually want the best for Rutgers yet people here wear scarlet covered glasses and condemn them

Maybe they have been right all along....
I’ve had this discussion alot in the past. I can guarantee you nj.com wishes Rutgers was better. Better team = more clicks = better coverage = more money

But yes. When Rutgers is doing bad - they’ll amplify it. When Rutgers is doing good - see the first three weeks of the season - they also amplify it. That’s they’d job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smols

LotusAggressor_rivals

All-American
Oct 11, 2003
16,270
8,102
113
Sorry, I don’t agree. I’ve been a subscriber to the SL and now NJ.com. I think their articles are overall fair and their writers are certainly not “anti RU” if you read all the articles. They report what is real and that is their job. Their RU writers want RU to be successful and anyone who listens to their podcast knows that. It’s better business for them. I have a big problem with people who hammer the press, it may not be reported the way you want. But I would never accept the “word” of anyone in a position of power or authority over a good independent questioning of what the truth is.
Do they REALLY want RU to be successful athletically? The last somewhat successful era of RU football was greeted with a hail of journalistic hatchet jobs that cost one of the architects of the success his job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tru2ru1

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
89,222
87,176
113
I’ve had this discussion alot in the past. I can guarantee you nj.com wishes Rutgers was better. Better team = more clicks = better coverage = more money

But yes. When Rutgers is doing bad - they’ll amplify it. When Rutgers is doing good - see the first three weeks of the season - they also amplify it. That’s they’d job.
So Rutgers did "bad" by hiring a new AD with a tremendous resume? Did they spend money on a search firm that did not find a good fit- sure-is that worth a story- nope. That point seems to have been missed. The post on X by Politi and the article had no purpose other than to paint Rutgers in a bad light. This was BEFORE yesterday's game.
 

ScarletKid2008

Heisman
Sep 8, 2006
8,042
10,547
113
Still paid the search firm 200k for zero results.
It’s a pretty normal and reasonable cost of business. The search firm produced a list of candidates and seemingly a highly desirable one that went all the way to the negotiation table for our top target at that time. So I mean the search firm did what they were hired to do , which was identify candidates. And they probably worked way more man hours than a normal search would be for that position because we didn’t have a president in place.

in other words .. $200k seems like a non desirable but acceptable cost of business outcome for both sides of this
 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,220
17,902
97
So Rutgers did "bad" by hiring a new AD with a tremendous resume? Did they spend money on a search firm that did not find a good fit- sure-is that worth a story- nope. That point seems to have been missed. The post on X by Politi and the article had no purpose other than to paint Rutgers in a bad light. This was BEFORE yesterday's game.

there’s always a purpose. Purpose is to get clicks.

everyone currently talking about athletic finances after the PSU buyout. This article paints a picture that some of RU’s financial troubles can be self-inflicted
 

Conq1234569

Junior
Nov 28, 2022
114
203
43
Sports media hates the sports teams they cover. Look at Philly with WIP. When the Eagles won their SB last year they had their worst ratings in a long time. Remember this: No one hates Philly sports more than Philly sports media, and no one hates Philly sports media more than Philly sports fans. Guarantee it's the same with Nj.com or WFAN with NY sports.
Where did you see that WIP's ratings were the worst in a long time after the Eagles won a Super Bowl? There is no chance that is true.
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,435
4,681
66
So Rutgers did "bad" by hiring a new AD with a tremendous resume? Did they spend money on a search firm that did not find a good fit- sure-is that worth a story- nope. That point seems to have been missed. The post on X by Politi and the article had no purpose other than to paint Rutgers in a bad light. This was BEFORE yesterday's game.
Is there any way to paint the current RU high profile sports in a good light ? Grifter Greg, epic basketball fail, the women’s non competitiveness, Hobbs’ scandal …. hiring a new AD isn’t even a positive, it’s a necessity.

He’s paid to write about RU athletics that matter most. Is he supposed to lie ? Should he lie and credit Schiano for ending 8 wars and lowering drug prices 800% ?

When there’s something positive to write, he will.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smols

bigmatt718

Heisman
Mar 11, 2013
15,956
22,468
113
Where did you see that WIP's ratings were the worst in a long time after the Eagles won a Super Bowl? There is no chance that is true.
Fans dont call in after wins in Philly. They call in after losses. Everyone knows that.
 

Conq1234569

Junior
Nov 28, 2022
114
203
43
Fans dont call in after wins in Philly. They call in after losses. Everyone knows that.
Okay, so you don't have concrete proof that their ratings are down, you're just going off of assumptions that "everyone knows."

"WIP posted humongous big numbers in a winter ratings book that went from January 9th to April 2nd, covering both the Eagles Super Bowl run and front end of the Phillies season."


"Eagles Fever Helps Philly’s WIP-FM Smash Ratings Record."

 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
31,648
16,440
113
TurnkeyZRG has been hired to conduct Florida's head coaching search.
Maybe Rutgers hiring them wasn't such a bad idea and waste of money, even though who they recomended didn't want the job and Tate went with someone he felt fit what Rutgers needed once Tate could officaly hire Hobbs replacement.
TurnkeyZRG is a respect search firm, but like everything in life, isn't a fool proof solution .
 

BigRnj

All-American
Nov 20, 2012
4,994
6,750
63
Penis head Politi implied he is in the wrong profession in the OP article. While I agree he is in the wrong profession, it is not for the implied reason. Truth is as an unlikable whiny doosh, he would never convince any organization to take a flyer on him in a position requiring respect, knowledge, diplomacy, and a PUNK-free personality.

If he’s looking to change jobs maybe supervising fundraising for Bill Belichick’s exclusive hacks on getting young Tar Heel chicks would be appropriate. Politi ain’t getting much on his own with the disposition he is projecting publicly.
 

Conq1234569

Junior
Nov 28, 2022
114
203
43
I believe that search firm found a very good candidate but once Brian Lafemina let Rutgers know he wasn't interested RU decided to let TurnkeyZRG, go and the new RU President Tate went after Zinn
Tate's hiring was official on July 1st , Rutgers hired TurnkeyZRG in April 2025 before Tate could be involved in the hiring and firing process and once the candidate ,Lafemina , Turnkey recommended said he wasn't interested
RU President Tate went after someone he knew and felt was the best person for the job

Lafemina was a fine candidate. The search firm didn't find him, though. Rutgers/Amy Towers identified him as the target in the fall, months before they hired Turnkey. The second finalist was a New Jersey native with deep ties to Rutgers. What did Turnkey do?
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
31,648
16,440
113
Lafemina was a fine candidate. The search firm didn't find him, though. Rutgers/Amy Towers identified him as the target in the fall, months before they hired Turnkey. The second finalist was a New Jersey native with deep ties to Rutgers. What did Turnkey do?
well a google search disagrees with your saying they didn't find him
>The Turnkey search firm recommended
Brian Lafemina as the top candidate for Rutgers' Athletic Director position, but he withdrew his name from consideration. Rutgers eventually parted ways with Turnkey and hired Keli Zinn, LSU's executive deputy AD, who was not a candidate recommended by Turnkey's initial commercial-focused strategy.

  • Turnkey's top candidate: Brian Lafemina withdrew his name from consideration, leading to a change in the search process.
  • Turnkey's strategy: The firm initially focused on candidates with commercial backgrounds, a strategy that did not lead to the final hire.
  • The final hire: Rutgers hired Keli Zinn, who had a different background than the type of candidate Turnkey initially focused on. Rutgers ultimately parted ways with Turnkey before hiring Zinn<
 

Conq1234569

Junior
Nov 28, 2022
114
203
43
well a google search disagrees with your saying they didn't find him
>The Turnkey search firm recommended
Brian Lafemina as the top candidate for Rutgers' Athletic Director position, but he withdrew his name from consideration. Rutgers eventually parted ways with Turnkey and hired Keli Zinn, LSU's executive deputy AD, who was not a candidate recommended by Turnkey's initial commercial-focused strategy.

  • Turnkey's top candidate: Brian Lafemina withdrew his name from consideration, leading to a change in the search process.
  • Turnkey's strategy: The firm initially focused on candidates with commercial backgrounds, a strategy that did not lead to the final hire.
  • The final hire: Rutgers hired Keli Zinn, who had a different background than the type of candidate Turnkey initially focused on. Rutgers ultimately parted ways with Turnkey before hiring Zinn<
Come on. A google search? He attended two games last season. He was at spring practice — which ended before the search firm was hired. All of this was out there.

I think this debate is mostly silly but so is calling him "Turney's candidate."

The 1989 graduate of Rutgers, Lafemina was a member of the men’s diving team during his freshman year and was around his alma mater frequently in the past year, attending multiple football games — from home wins over Akron and Washington to a loss to USC in Los Angeles — and at least one practice this spring.
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
31,648
16,440
113
Come on. A google search? He attended two games last season. He was at spring practice — which ended before the search firm was hired. All of this was out there.

I think this debate is mostly silly but so is calling him "Turney's candidate."

The 1989 graduate of Rutgers, Lafemina was a member of the men’s diving team during his freshman year and was around his alma mater frequently in the past year, attending multiple football games — from home wins over Akron and Washington to a loss to USC in Los Angeles — and at least one practice this spring.
A lot of alumni attend games and he is just one of them.
Being close to Rutgers doesn't mean a search firm didn't reach out to him and hold discussions about if he was interested in the position.
As for using google for the info I provided, just an honest way to say I don't have inside info and showing my source.
Your opinion is good as mine, I just used google to find out what I could and base my opinion that the Turnkey search firm contacted him to gauge his interest in becoming Rutgers AD .

To back my opinion I did another search and found this article.
>Turnkey did have a couple of names who were close to being hired by Rutgers. Candidate Brian Lafemina seemed to be a good fit for the job before he pulled his name out of the running. Mike Palisi is another candidate who has had his name thrown around <
 
Last edited:

sct1111

All-American
Nov 30, 2014
6,116
8,407
113
Politi is a journalist. He has to write about things that people read. He WANTS to write positive things about Rutgers athletics because that gets clicks and he DOES when we win. But we suck. So he has to write about something. The $200k was absolutely a waste.

The good thing? We have a president who gets sht done and a AD who seems like a winner.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Knight Shift

bigmatt718

Heisman
Mar 11, 2013
15,956
22,468
113
Politi is a journalist. He has to write about things that people read. He WANTS to write positive things about Rutgers athletics because that gets clicks and he DOES when we win. But we suck. So he has to write about something. The $200k was absolutely a waste.

The good thing? We have a president who gets sht done and a AD who seems like a winner.
Cant wait for AI to send him into retirement in a couple years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

noble106

Junior
Aug 17, 2017
217
227
43
Is there any way to paint the current RU high profile sports in a good light ? Grifter Greg, epic basketball fail, the women’s non competitiveness, Hobbs’ scandal …. hiring a new AD isn’t even a positive, it’s a necessity.

He’s paid to write about RU athletics that matter most. Is he supposed to lie ? Should he lie and credit Schiano for ending 8 wars and lowering drug prices 800% ?

When there’s something positive to write, he will.
He's had several chances since our 2023 season but hasn't seem to as far as I know. He's either backhanded or silent about the things RU is doing right.

For instance, he could've written about Raymond's game yesterday. But he hasn't and probably won't because he's not interested in supporting RU.