No Kings 10/18

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,345
27,134
113
That's not what he said
Are you really going to get that granular? It's like saying he'll sue if this group doesn't pay a fee but we all know that wouldn't apply to a tea party rally for example. He wants to make it harder for speech he doesn't like and you know that's true.

Hi Grok, is it normal for a city to waive a fee for a protest?

"Yes, it's relatively normal for cities to waive fees for protests or public demonstrations
, though it depends on local laws, policies, and the context of the event. I'll break this down step by step with explanations and examples.Why Fees Exist in the First Place
  • Many cities require permits for large gatherings in public spaces (e.g., parks, streets, or sidewalks) to cover administrative costs, police overtime, cleanup, traffic control, or potential damages.
  • These fees can range from a few hundred dollars for small events to tens of thousands for major ones (e.g., New York City has charged up to $50,000+ for high-impact protests involving road closures).
  • Fees are often outlined in municipal codes under "special event" or "First Amendment activity" regulations, balancing public safety with free speech rights protected by the U.S. Constitution (or equivalent in other countries).
When and Why Waivers Are Granted
  • Legal Protections for Free Speech: In the U.S., courts have ruled that fee structures can't unduly burden First Amendment activities like protests. For instance, waivers are common if the event is deemed "expressive" (political speech) rather than commercial. Cities may waive fees to avoid lawsuits claiming discrimination or suppression of rights (e.g., based on Supreme Court cases like Forsyth County v. Nationalist Movement in 1992, which struck down vague fee discretion).
  • Public Interest or Policy Decisions: Cities might waive fees for events promoting civic engagement, community causes, or during crises (e.g., Black Lives Matter protests in 2020 saw widespread waivers in places like Seattle and Portland to facilitate dialogue amid social unrest).
  • Discretionary Authority: City councils, mayors, or permitting offices often have leeway. Waivers can be partial (e.g., covering only cleanup) or full, based on factors like:
    • Group size and impact (small protests might get automatic waivers).
    • Nonprofit status or sponsorship.
    • Historical precedents (e.g., annual events like pride parades often get waived).
  • Equity Considerations: Some cities (e.g., San Francisco or Chicago) have policies to reduce barriers for underrepresented groups, waiving fees for protests on issues like racial justice or labor rights."
In summary, waivers are a standard tool to uphold free expression while managing costs, and they're especially common in larger U.S. cities with robust protest cultures. If this is about a specific city or event, local ordinances (check the city's website or code) would provide exact details—practices vary widely. If you have more context, I can dig deeper!"

 
  • Like
Reactions: ClemsonCO14

AugTig

All-Conference
Nov 24, 2003
2,087
2,707
78
You're a sad, insecure, pathetic little

Cute insult. When people run out of arguments, they always reach for names.

You can call it “awful theology” or “old talking points,” but truth doesn’t expire just because it makes you uncomfortable. The moral foundation this country was built on isn’t outdated... it’s just inconvenient for people who don’t want accountability. And if defending faith, family, and freedom makes me “trash,” then grab a broom.
So funny and typical that they respond with more insults. They are completely against defending faith, family, and freedom and their childish insults show that. Always triggered and attacking others that don't agree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,345
27,134
113
So funny and typical that they respond with more insults. They are completely against defending faith, family, and freedom and their childish insults show that. Always triggered and attacking others that don't agree.
Lets talk about what you do Tiglet. You jump out like a special needs jack in the box to only criticize other posters. That's it, that's all you offer and the way you say everything is the dumbest way you could say it. Sit your *** down, you offer nothing of value -nothing. And I would advise you to take a second look to see who starts attacking who you fake little punk.
 

chscoggins

Junior
Jan 6, 2011
195
295
63
Lets talk about what you do Tiglet. You jump out like a special needs jack in the box to only criticize other posters. That's it, that's all you offer and the way you say everything is the dumbest way you could say it. Sit your *** down, you offer nothing of value -nothing. And I would advise you to take a second look to see who starts attacking who you fake little punk.
No one is taking advice from you.😂😂
 

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
4,903
4,732
113
Are you really going to get that granular? It's like saying he'll sue if this group doesn't pay a fee but we all know that wouldn't apply to a tea party rally for example. He wants to make it harder for speech he doesn't like and you know that's true.

Hi Grok, is it normal for a city to waive a fee for a protest?

"Yes, it's relatively normal for cities to waive fees for protests or public demonstrations
, though it depends on local laws, policies, and the context of the event. I'll break this down step by step with explanations and examples.Why Fees Exist in the First Place
  • Many cities require permits for large gatherings in public spaces (e.g., parks, streets, or sidewalks) to cover administrative costs, police overtime, cleanup, traffic control, or potential damages.
  • These fees can range from a few hundred dollars for small events to tens of thousands for major ones (e.g., New York City has charged up to $50,000+ for high-impact protests involving road closures).
  • Fees are often outlined in municipal codes under "special event" or "First Amendment activity" regulations, balancing public safety with free speech rights protected by the U.S. Constitution (or equivalent in other countries).
When and Why Waivers Are Granted
  • Legal Protections for Free Speech: In the U.S., courts have ruled that fee structures can't unduly burden First Amendment activities like protests. For instance, waivers are common if the event is deemed "expressive" (political speech) rather than commercial. Cities may waive fees to avoid lawsuits claiming discrimination or suppression of rights (e.g., based on Supreme Court cases like Forsyth County v. Nationalist Movement in 1992, which struck down vague fee discretion).
  • Public Interest or Policy Decisions: Cities might waive fees for events promoting civic engagement, community causes, or during crises (e.g., Black Lives Matter protests in 2020 saw widespread waivers in places like Seattle and Portland to facilitate dialogue amid social unrest).
  • Discretionary Authority: City councils, mayors, or permitting offices often have leeway. Waivers can be partial (e.g., covering only cleanup) or full, based on factors like:
    • Group size and impact (small protests might get automatic waivers).
    • Nonprofit status or sponsorship.
    • Historical precedents (e.g., annual events like pride parades often get waived).
  • Equity Considerations: Some cities (e.g., San Francisco or Chicago) have policies to reduce barriers for underrepresented groups, waiving fees for protests on issues like racial justice or labor rights."
In summary, waivers are a standard tool to uphold free expression while managing costs, and they're especially common in larger U.S. cities with robust protest cultures. If this is about a specific city or event, local ordinances (check the city's website or code) would provide exact details—practices vary widely. If you have more context, I can dig deeper!"

Trump says a lot of stuff but in the end he can only do what's legal. He can push the boundaries like Biden did with student loan forgiveness but he's not a king or a Nazi as much as you insist he is. And rest assured there will be more elections.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AugTig

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,345
27,134
113
Trump says a lot of stuff but in the end he can only do what's legal. He can push the boundaries like Biden did with student loan forgiveness but he's not a king or a Nazi as much as you insist he is. And rest assured there will be more elections.
Yes he is, it just embarrasses you to admit it and I don't blame you - by dismissing all his malevolent un-American lawfare, you are complicit. It's because of people like you that he can keep pushing the boundaries because he knows you'll do nothing to stop him- nothing.
 

AugTig

All-Conference
Nov 24, 2003
2,087
2,707
78
Lets talk about what you do Tiglet. You jump out like a special needs jack in the box to only criticize other posters. That's it, that's all you offer and the way you say everything is the dumbest way you could say it. Sit your *** down, you offer nothing of value -nothing. And I would advise you to take a second look to see who starts attacking who you fake little punk.
You continue to prove my point. So much hatred in your heart. I feel sad for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
10,198
21,635
113
Retards. Groomers. Useful idiots. Gullible, naive, easily brainwashed muppets. Antifa. Paid protesters. They'll all be there.

Cute insult. When people run out of arguments, they always reach for names.

You can call it “awful theology” or “old talking points,” but truth doesn’t expire just because it makes you uncomfortable. The moral foundation this country was built on isn’t outdated... it’s just inconvenient for people who don’t want accountability. And if defending faith, family, and freedom makes me “trash,” then grab a broom.
These two posts in short order made me chuckle.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,345
27,134
113
You continue to prove my point. So much hatred in your heart. I feel sad for you.
Think about what YOU DO before talking about how I react to what YOU DO. I'm pleasant to people who address me that way but if your entire schtick is attacking people from the sidelines. you deserve what you get.
 

scotchtiger

Heisman
Dec 15, 2005
134,876
22,604
113
While you yawn and deny what's happening right in front of you because you got your big tax break, the rest of us will have to save the country for you.





Good sermon last week at church. Pastor talked about "kings" and pointed out that if your life revolves around this stuff and you get overly bent out of shape, then your political feelings are your "king" and that's what you serve. So enjoy serving your king @dpic73.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,345
27,134
113
Good sermon last week at church. Pastor talked about "kings" and pointed out that if your life revolves around this stuff and you get overly bent out of shape, then your political feelings are your "king" and that's what you serve. So enjoy serving your king @dpic73.
Your pastor sounds like a MAGA who wants you to ignore the mad king so he can finish the job of destroying your enemies. Pretend like it's not happening - maybe even mock those who are trying to hold the line. No worries, we'll do the dirty work for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rastafarian

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
4,903
4,732
113
Yes he is, it just embarrasses you to admit it and I don't blame you - by dismissing all his malevolent un-American lawfare, you are complicit. It's because of people like you that he can keep pushing the boundaries because he knows you'll do nothing to stop him- nothing.
All of the lawsuits and impeachments against Trump were legit and the lawsuits against Comey, Bolton, and James are without merit?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
10,198
21,635
113
All of the lawsuits and impeachments against Trump were legit and the lawsuits against Comey, Bolton, and James are without merit?
Will note Bolton was started under the Biden administration. And that the DOJ didn't pursue multiple avenues against Trump (number of the lawsuits weren't by the DOJ but NY/GA/etc). And then had a special prosecutor, rather than an unqualified yes person throw together a sloppy indictment. Though I didn't love the NY lawsuit in particular. But wasn't the DOJ.
 

tigres88

All-American
Aug 7, 2022
2,890
7,602
113
If Maga doesn't like it? Here's the blame list:

-Obama
- Biden
- soros
-democrats
- women
- the jews (but never Israel!)

Jesus y’all are lame
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,345
27,134
113
All of the lawsuits and impeachments against Trump were legit and the lawsuits against Comey, Bolton, and James are without merit?
Honestly, I don't even know how to relate to people who pretend like Trump didn't commit the most egregious crimes possible for a POTUS - he did and you know it but have decided to look the other way to preserve your moral compass. Biden didn't go after anybody as he let Garland do his job independently, the way it should be.

Garland went about it slowly and terribly but there should be no argument that it was the right thing to do - how can you let a mad king pathologically lie about an election he lost by 7million votes and then try to overturn that election with every means at his disposal, including violence and NOT prosecute? How can you let him take a slew of Top Secret documents that he wasn't allowed to have and not prosecute him after asking him to return them for a year while he lied and obstructed the investigation?

If we're ok with those things and just let them slide, we are lost as a country.

If it were me, I wouldn't have brought the Letitia James case but it was legitimate and he was unanimously convicted by a jury of his peers. The Bragg case I agreed with because it was an attempt to hide a salacious story before the election that he would have lost otherwise, had it come out, but it still shouldn't have come before the more serious cases.

The cases against Comey, Bolton and James are just vengeful retribution and not something a decent President should be involved in. He should be thankful and contrite that he got re-elected despite his laundry list of corruption and showed us a better man, not a worse one.

Again, this won't end well and if you give him a pass, you will be complicit, sorry.
 

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
4,903
4,732
113
Will note Bolton was started under the Biden administration. And that the DOJ didn't pursue multiple avenues against Trump (number of the lawsuits weren't by the DOJ but NY/GA/etc). And then had a special prosecutor, rather than an unqualified yes person throw together a sloppy indictment. Though I didn't love the NY lawsuit in particular. But wasn't the DOJ.
I don't know who started what but here are my opinions:
  • The Russia hoax was just that and it consumed 3 years of Trump's first term.
  • The impeachment due to Trump's phone call with Zelensky was ridiculous
  • The second impeachment for trying to overturn the 2020 election probably the most understandable but I suspect it lacked legal merit. I think Trump stretched every legal option and took things too far.
  • I think everything done by Letitia James was disgusting. She ran campaign ads promising to find something she could hang on Trump. She didn't even know what it was. I don't believe E. Jean Caroll. I can't even go into a Target dressing room without an attendant there to oversee things and I'm supposed to believe that nobody saw or heard anything at Bergdoff Goodman? Liberal NY AG Cyrus Vance wouldn't even take the mortgage fraud case where there were no victims.
  • There was an unconditional discharge in the Stormy Daniels case because the verdict / penalty was ridiculous. A bookkeeper recording payment to a lawyer as a legal expense = 34 felonies?
  • The records case at Mar a Lago was equally absurd. Just about every recent president + Hillary has been found with classified records yet this is the one that was prosecuted after a raid? Trump's records were in a closet. Bidens were in cardboard boxes in an open garage.
Now let's talk about the lawsuits against Comey, James, and Bolton. Are they guilty? Probably. Are the lawsuits politically motivated revenge? Absolutely! Trump lied when he said his revenge would be success. But so were the cases against Trump. Politics in this country have become an embarrassment. But acting like the cases against Trump were purely about the law and not politically motivated while at the same time calling the cases against Trump's adversaries are all politics goes beyond all reason.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,345
27,134
113
Dpic...if you are not getting paid to go to no kings then you missed out bro.
I can promise you that none of us require a cent to do this willingly and voluntarily because it's the right thing to do since he's removed all the guardrails that would normally hold him accountable. This is your desperate attempt to cope with the sight of millions that would march against your all powerful god-king. Pathetic
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TigerGrowls

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
10,198
21,635
113
I don't know who started what but here are my opinions:
  • The Russia hoax was just that and it consumed 3 years of Trump's first term.
  • The impeachment due to Trump's phone call with Zelensky was ridiculous
  • The second impeachment for trying to overturn the 2020 election probably the most understandable but I suspect it lacked legal merit. I think Trump stretched every legal option and took things too far.
  • I think everything done by Letitia James was disgusting. She ran campaign ads promising to find something she could hang on Trump. She didn't even know what it was. I don't believe E. Jean Caroll. I can't even go into a Target dressing room without an attendant there to oversee things and I'm supposed to believe that nobody saw or heard anything at Bergdoff Goodman? Liberal NY AG Cyrus Vance wouldn't even take the mortgage fraud case where there were no victims.
  • There was an unconditional discharge in the Stormy Daniels case because the verdict / penalty was ridiculous. A bookkeeper recording payment to a lawyer as a legal expense = 34 felonies?
  • The records case at Mar a Lago was equally absurd. Just about every recent president + Hillary has been found with classified records yet this is the one that was prosecuted after a raid? Trump's records were in a closet. Bidens were in cardboard boxes in an open garage.
Now let's talk about the lawsuits against Comey, James, and Bolton. Are they guilty? Probably. Are the lawsuits politically motivated revenge? Absolutely! Trump lied when he said his revenge would be success. But so were the cases against Trump. Politics in this country have become an embarrassment. But acting like the cases against Trump were purely about the law and not politically motivated while at the same time calling the cases against Trump's adversaries are all politics goes beyond all reason.
I don't take issue with some of those opinions, but all of them are heavily biased. The phone call for example with Zelensky. The idea that a president would imply promised aid would be withheld if another country doesn't announce an investigation into your political opponent, and that being something normalized under Trump is wild to me. But no doubt I'm biased too. Definitely can't say I'm a fan of L James, and everything she did, so don't really have a problem with any issues taken by the right with how she did her thing. The case against her seems flimsy, but provided she is treated like others would under the law, don't really have an issue there. Agree on the Trump mortgage case, but pretty interesting that Biden didn't demand it be brought anyway from Vance. The records case one is the one where your description is another I disagree with. His reaction wasn't even a little bit like other presidents. It wasn't at all about having documents, and that people keep claiming that is what is absurd. If he had given the documents back that were requested, and didn't lie, direct others to lie, move boxes ahead of agents, etc, there wouldn't have been enough for a warrant. So if you've got examples of that by other presidents, I'm all eyes.
 

chscoggins

Junior
Jan 6, 2011
195
295
63
I can promise you that none of us require a cent to do this willingly and voluntarily because it's the right thing to do since he's removed all the guardrails that would normally hold him accountable. This is your desperate attempt to cope with the sight of millions that would march against your all powerful god-king. Pathetic
Man take a break you are letting politics ruin your life. Not everyone is stupid, dumb or whatever other insult you can come up with, because their opinion is different than yours.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,345
27,134
113
Man take a break you are letting politics ruin your life. Not everyone is stupid, dumb or whatever other insult you can come up with, because their opinion is different than yours.
Not everyone is but you are. If you keep poking the bear, I'll list all of your messages in one post so the board can see your contributions, which will prove how critical and irrelevant you are, with nothing else to offer.
 

chscoggins

Junior
Jan 6, 2011
195
295
63
Not everyone is but you are. If you keep poking the bear, I'll list all of your messages in one post so the board can see your contributions, which will prove how critical and irrelevant you are, with nothing else to offer.
You are more like a mouse not a bear. Do I really affect your life in such a way that you are going to research all my post? Go ahead start a thread just about me, I’m honored. You have my name, I don’t hide behind a silly internet handle and Avatar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,345
27,134
113
You are more like a mouse not a bear. Do I really affect your life in such a way that you are going to research all my post? Go ahead start a thread just about me, I’m honored. You have my name, I don’t hide behind a silly internet handle and Avatar.
Listen dude, you've made it your mission to **** with me in particular and you've done it repeatedly while adding nothing to the conversation. There are other choices you could make, that's up to you.
 

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
4,903
4,732
113
I don't take issue with some of those opinions, but all of them are heavily biased. The phone call for example with Zelensky. The idea that a president would imply promised aid would be withheld if another country doesn't announce an investigation into your political opponent, and that being something normalized under Trump is wild to me. But no doubt I'm biased too. Definitely can't say I'm a fan of L James, and everything she did, so don't really have a problem with any issues taken by the right with how she did her thing. The case against her seems flimsy, but provided she is treated like others would under the law, don't really have an issue there. Agree on the Trump mortgage case, but pretty interesting that Biden didn't demand it be brought anyway from Vance. The records case one is the one where your description is another I disagree with. His reaction wasn't even a little bit like other presidents. It wasn't at all about having documents, and that people keep claiming that is what is absurd. If he had given the documents back that were requested, and didn't lie, direct others to lie, move boxes ahead of agents, etc, there wouldn't have been enough for a warrant. So if you've got examples of that by other presidents, I'm all eyes.
The exact transcript of Trump's phone call from Zelensky: He said two things:
  1. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it's something that you should ·really ask them about. When I was··speaking to Angela Merkel she talks Ukraine, but she ·doesn't do anything. A lot of the European countries are the. same way· so I think it's something you want to look at but the United States has been very ·very good to Ukraine.
  2. I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has.it. There- are a lot. of things that went on, the·:whole situation. I think you 1 re _surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to ·get to the bottom of it.
I don't see how anybody can twist this into a threat that the U.S. would stop aid to Ukraine.

I think James is 100% guilty. Absolutely zero doubt about it. I also think that Trump used inflated values when he borrowed money from Deutche Bank. It's done all the time but that doesn't make it right. Two things about that. One is that Trump has Cushman Wakefield perform the "independent" appraisals. The other is that the bank doesn't take those appraisals at face value. They do their own appraisals and make their own determination. The bank even testified to that.

Biden is smarter than Trump in the sense that he uses other people to do his bidding (plausible deniability). Trump is unique that he recklessly does things on his own.

The difference between Biden & Trump on records are that Trump's home was raided and he fought back. Biden was given advance notice and he was more cooperative. But BOTH had classified documents and Trump's documents were more secured.

My point in the whole thing is that democrats targeted Trump and now Trump is targeting democrats. On one hand I think people should be held accountable but on the other hand things shouldn't be politically motivated. Anybody who acts like the weaponization of government is only by republicans is intentionally keeping their eyes closed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

Aardvark86

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
1,996
3,032
113
Honestly, these no kings rallies won't do much for me until they bring back the giant puppets that they used in the antinuclear demonstrations in the 80s and the world bank protests of the 90s.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,896
35,923
113
What a motley crew.



The Communist Party USA is an official sponsor of the No Kings Day protest Oct 18th, they’re on the flyer

Indivisible is also sponsoring it, that’s funded by George Soros

The last No Kings Day protest James O'Keefe exposed 'Communist People’s Republic' paying people to protest and collecting names to recruit for protesting

The last No Kings Day protest was also funded by Indivisible, paid for by George Soros

Notice a pattern here?

These protests will NEVER END until you lock up the people paying for them
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,345
27,134
113
What a motley crew.



The Communist Party USA is an official sponsor of the No Kings Day protest Oct 18th, they’re on the flyer

Indivisible is also sponsoring it, that’s funded by George Soros

The last No Kings Day protest James O'Keefe exposed 'Communist People’s Republic' paying people to protest and collecting names to recruit for protesting

The last No Kings Day protest was also funded by Indivisible, paid for by George Soros

Notice a pattern here?

These protests will NEVER END until you lock up the people paying for them

Oh Growls, everyone knows you're a pathological liar with no credibility so we all see this as your desperate attempt to paint the crowd as paid Communist insurgents LOL, but you're dead wrong. These are ordinary, everyday people that want their voices to be heard since those on the right are unwilling to stand in the way of his fascist takeover. And every group and/or person of note is demanding that we should all be peaceful and not engage in any type of violent activity, even if provoked. The crowd estimates for the last one ranged from 5M to 13M people and it went off without a hitch, besides the lunatic in Utah who came ready to spray the crowd with bullets but he was not one of ours. Cry, Cry hard, Cry harder, Cry as hard as you can and all of us Commies will laugh at you!