PJ Fleck gives his take on the Cooper DeJean fair catch incident back in 2023

83Hawk

All-Conference
Jan 1, 2023
1,463
3,230
113
Despite the blatant error, Iowa could/should have won the game. Only needed about 15-20 yards to get in makeable FG range with PLENTY of time to do it. Naturally the non-existent offense failed to move the ball. Fans tend to forget that part.
 

DukeSlater

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2023
1,778
4,081
113
Despite the blatant error, Iowa could/should have won the game. Only needed about 15-20 yards to get in makeable FG range with PLENTY of time to do it. Naturally the non-existent offense failed to move the ball. Fans tend to forget that part.
You are absolutely right. But it still doesn't negate the fact that (1) it wasn't a fair catch signal, and nobody on the field thought it was--not Minnesota's players, not the game officials and (2) replay has no right to "reofficiate" the game; replay is only supposed to review what they are asked to review. In this case, it was wether DeJean was out of bounds. Otherwise, the booth could be calling holding or anything else that they see in the review that was missed on the field. It would be ridiculous . . . which is what that call was. And it always will be, no matter what PJ or anyone else says. The facts are the facts.
 

Ironman39

All-Conference
Dec 10, 2024
1,565
1,735
113
Despite the blatant error, Iowa could/should have won the game. Only needed about 15-20 yards to get in makeable FG range with PLENTY of time to do it. Naturally the non-existent offense failed to move the ball. Fans tend to forget that part.
Yeah well Minnesota should've let our offense move down the field to make up for the terrible call.
 

Jonesy5960

Heisman
Feb 1, 2023
5,657
11,543
113
Despite the blatant error, Iowa could/should have won the game. Only needed about 15-20 yards to get in makeable FG range with PLENTY of time to do it. Naturally the non-existent offense failed to move the ball. Fans tend to forget that part.
No kidding. Iowa had no business winning that game. You're not supposed to win football games scoring 10 points in this era of college football. In the second half that vaunted Iowa offense managed zero points on 2 yards of total offense with 2 turnovers. It was the most pathetic display of offensive football I have ever seen. In retrospect that play and that game were a godsend because it pushed the administration to finally rid the program of the worst OC in FBS football. Thank God that call was made. It saved Iowa football. Refs ought to get a medal or something.
 

FanInBlack

All-Conference
Nov 9, 2001
1,853
3,922
113
Despite the blatant error, Iowa could/should have won the game. Only needed about 15-20 yards to get in makeable FG range with PLENTY of time to do it. Naturally the non-existent offense failed to move the ball. Fans tend to forget that part.
I have never understood why they didnt just direct snap it to him 3 times. He already beat their 11 once. Give him 3 shots to get 20 yards.
 

BunchofAholes

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2025
2,096
3,993
113
No kidding. Iowa had no business winning that game. You're not supposed to win football games scoring 10 points in this era of college football. In the second half that vaunted Iowa offense managed zero points on 2 yards of total offense with 2 turnovers. It was the most pathetic display of offensive football I have ever seen. In retrospect that play and that game were a godsend because it pushed the administration to finally rid the program of the worst OC in FBS football. Thank God that call was made. It saved Iowa football. Refs ought to get a medal or something.
I'll take the good call (no booth intervention) and the W. Brian would have been gone anyway.
 

bman546

Freshman
Nov 16, 2008
32
57
18
An "Invalid Fair Catch Signal" can only be invalid fair catch signal if calling for a fair catch.. I mean, if the returner is NOT calling for a fair catch, there certainly can't be an invalid fair catch signal right? players wave their arms on ever punt that hits the ground to alert their teammates,,, I can't believe I am responding to this issue almost 2 years after nit happened...
 

BunchofAholes

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2025
2,096
3,993
113
Very true, but it is fun to think about this as a strategy. No worse than your QB throwing a probable incompletion or RB carrying into a stacked box.
Yep, but that would require a coach willing to do something unique. Not the KFz m.o.

BTW, wouldn't the RB carrying into a stacked box, be DeJean?
 
  • Wow
Reactions: LittleBro_Hawkeyes

BunchofAholes

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2025
2,096
3,993
113
An "Invalid Fair Catch Signal" can only be invalid fair catch signal if calling for a fair catch.. I mean, if the returner is NOT calling for a fair catch, there certainly can't be an invalid fair catch signal right? players wave their arms on ever punt that hits the ground to alert their teammates,,, I can't believe I am responding to this issue almost 2 years after nit happened...
Yeah. What really makes it bad is that's not why the review was done. It was to confirm he didn't step out. How do you make a completely different call after the fact? Especially when the intent of that rule is how players ON THE FIELD see it, not how it looks from up above in the booth.
 

rchawk

All-American
Oct 27, 2001
73,834
8,100
113
Yep, but that would require a coach willing to do something unique. Not the KFz m.o.

BTW, wouldn't the RB carrying into a stacked box, be DeJean?
Yes, but if he takes the snap directly at punter depth, he can look over the defense before the snap. Send a couple of tall receivers (TEs?) 20 or 30 yards deep to draw a few defenders back. As I said, you need a special, very talented player to make it work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FanInBlack

Kceasthawk@77

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2005
2,227
4,023
113
Yeah. What really makes it bad is that's not why the review was done. It was to confirm he didn't step out. How do you make a completely different call after the fact? Especially when the intent of that rule is how players ON THE FIELD see it, not how it looks from up above in the booth.
You can't. They had NO authority to "reofficiate" the play and look for something that was not called on the field.
 

BunchofAholes

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2025
2,096
3,993
113
Yes, but if he takes the snap directly at punter depth, he can look over the defense before the snap. Send a couple of tall receivers (TEs?) 20 or 30 yards deep to draw a few defenders back. As I said, you need a special, very talented player to make it work.
and practicing that play. A moderately competent QB would have been enough. Alas...
 

Talons

All-Conference
Jul 23, 2025
427
1,255
93
Fleck is full of BS. He knows it. Watch the whole video if you wish, but in particular, watch at :51 and 1:23. Fleck clearly thought he had just lost another game to the Hawks. He was bailed out by some geek in some remote cubicle who over-interpreted what little power he thought he had and overruled the on-field officials who had no idea (like Fleck) what had just happened. But in the end, this miscarriage probably elevated Cooper's legendary status in the eyes of every Hawkeye fan, and many others elsewhere.
 

HawkInDenver

Senior
Apr 16, 2024
496
972
93
You can't. They had NO authority to "reofficiate" the play and look for something that was not called on the field.
This is the part I never understood. I always thought they could only look at certain things like stepping out of bounds. If a fair catch signal was made then why didn't the referee on the field make that call? I was there and it sucked to go from euphoria to gut punch. I know it's only sports but it really sucked! (I know I'm preaching to the choir)
Related to other posts, I think BF would have been gone even if we had won this game. His offensive stats would not have been any better.
If I'm Minny, then is this seriously the only way you can beat Iowa??
 
  • Haha
Reactions: LittleBro_Hawkeyes

WeBeHerkin

All-Conference
Aug 5, 2016
4,136
4,744
113
This is the part I never understood. I always thought they could only look at certain things like stepping out of bounds. If a fair catch signal was made then why didn't the referee on the field make that call? I was there and it sucked to go from euphoria to gut punch. I know it's only sports but it really sucked! (I know I'm preaching to the choir)
Related to other posts, I think BF would have been gone even if we had won this game. His offensive stats would not have been any better.
If I'm Minny, then is this seriously the only way you can beat Iowa??
It was F'ed up. Like having a replay official call holding on a play where a RB breaks for a TD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LetsGoHawks83