1. I don't have any of the Epstein files (or as you refer to it, "this important information") in my possession. I'm surprised that you thought I did.Why did the democrats cover for Trumps unsavory incidents?
Of course democrats did exactly nothing when they were in possession of this supposed information you have.
2. In what way were "the Democrats" covering for Trump's unsavory incidents? (I assume you are talking about his pedophilia while in the company of his best friend Jeff Epstein, because Trump figured prominently in plenty of other "unsavory incidents.") There is still ongoing litigation involving Ghislaine Maxwell, as there was for the entire time Joe Biden was President. Small wonder the grand jury transcripts were not released during those legal proceedings.
But the plain fact is that the grand jury transcripts related to Epstein are just the tip of the iceberg in terms of the totality of "the Epstein files." There are a ton of other records, and more information is coming to light every day. Epstein's employees and friends apparently compiled a "Birthday Book" for him on the occasion of his 50th birthday, and it was chock full of letters from his friends, including the letter from Donald Trump that wished him many more "wonderful secrets" and was in the outline of a naked female. There are also bank records concerning roughly 4,500 wire transfers into or out of Epstein's bank accounts, with the reported total amount of income from such wire transfers being roughly $1.5 billion. Trump could have released ALL of that stuff, but he didn't. Instead, he sought to portray the grand jury transcripts as constituting essentially the totality of Epstein information to be released to the public. And Pam Bondi's court petition seeking permission to release the grand jury transcripts was laughable. Every lawyer worth his or her salt knows that you have to get the consent of various parties, in particular people who are identified as victims in grand jury transcripts, in order to secure court approval of their public release. Yet Ms. Bondi never even gave notice, much less sought consent of, the victims identified in the subject grand jury transcripts. She knew from the outset that the DOJ's supposed desire to release the grand jury transcripts was feigned, and a political dog and pony show.
The Birthday Book and the names of the persons who wired big bucks to Epstein would probably be very illuminating. At minimum, a whole lot of those people would have some 'splainin' to do.
3. I have no (zero) doubt that some prominent Democrats were participants in Epstein's pedophile scheme. News reports say that the targets for his recruitment efforts were young women between the ages of 14 and 18. When they reached age 18, they apparently "aged out" of eligibility for Pedo Island. Yikes. Disgusting, and criminal. I want every single one of these pedophiles, regardless of his political party affiliation or personal accomplishments, to be identified and held to account. I think that sentiment is held by a lot of people on both sides of the political aisle. Bill Clinton will very likely figure in this scandal. Too bad, Bill. But Donald Trump was Epstein's best friend for over 10 years, and he spent a whole lot of time with Epstein. Photos confirming this keep popping up, which is surely inconvenient to Trump's efforts to distance himself from Epstein. Moreover, The Donald himself noted that Epstein "likes 'em on the young side." Ouch. Methinks Donald did, too.