False chronology of events. You libs fell for it and became hypnotized in the process. The truth is coming.You don't get to re-write history pigboy. Even if he was somehow wrong, it doesn't mean he "knew" the DNC wasn't hacked by Russia because the intelligence showed they absolutely did. You people are pathetic. When the Dems re-take power, I propose we round up all you treasonous propagandists so we can make good use of Alligator Alcatraz.
- Cybersecurity Firms' Findings: In 2016, CrowdStrike, a cybersecurity firm hired by the DNC, concluded that two Russian intelligence-affiliated groups, dubbed "Cozy Bear" (APT29) and "Fancy Bear" (APT28), breached the DNC's network. Their analysis identified specific malware, IP addresses, and techniques consistent with Russian state actors. Other firms, including Fidelis Cybersecurity and Mandiant (FireEye), independently corroborated these findings, linking the hacks to Russian intelligence.
- U.S. Intelligence Community: On October 7, 2016, the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued a joint statement asserting with "high confidence" that the Russian government directed the DNC hacks. The CIA, NSA, and FBI, in a January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, further confirmed Russian involvement, stating that the hacks were part of a broader effort to influence the 2016 election.
- Mueller Indictment: In July 2018, Special Counsel Robert Mueller indicted 12 Russian GRU (military intelligence) officers from Units 26165 and 74455, detailing their spearphishing campaigns targeting the DNC, DCCC, and Clinton campaign. The indictment described specific actions, such as using fake personas and malware like X-Agent to steal and leak emails via WikiLeaks.
- International Corroboration: Dutch intelligence (AIVD) reported infiltrating Cozy Bear’s networks in 2014–2015, observing their attacks on the DNC, State Department, and White House, and alerting the NSA.
- Technical Indicators: The hacks involved sophisticated techniques, such as spearphishing emails targeting John Podesta and DNC staff, and malware linked to prior Russian cyberattacks (e.g., German Bundestag, 2015). Data exfiltration methods and command-and-control servers matched known Russian tactics.
No, I dont give a **** about this ten year old story because we know they had legitimate reasons to investigate, Trump wasnt charged and everyone stopped talking about it because it no longer mattered. If Trump had an ounce of decency, he'd recognize what he's done to this country and be thankful he's been given a second chance. If he had a lot of decency, he'd apologize and try to be a better man, instead of morphing into the devil incarnate that most Americans hate.False chronology of events. You libs fell for it and became hypnotized in the process. The truth is coming.
They didn't stop. The Mueller campaign, both impeachments and the theft of the 2020 election were a continuation of the coup. This is war and we will win.No, I dont give a **** about this ten year old story because we know they had legitimate reasons to investigate, Trump wasnt charged and everyone stopped talking about it because it no longer mattered. It Trump had an ounce of decency, he'd recognize what he's done to this country and be thankful he's been given a second chance. If he had a lot of decency, he'd apologize and try to be a better man, instead of morphing into the devil incarnate that most Americans hate.
Because he's guilty and he's the devil. Now that he got away with it, he should apologize and do better by trying to unite us. Now that he's proving to be worse, we will throw his *** in the slammer much quicker this time, with no parole. He's stepped way over the line now and he and his minions need to fry.They didn't stop. The Mueller campaign, both impeachments and the theft of the 2020 election were a continuation of the coup. This is war and we will win.
Sure man but I promise you that you devil worshippers won't be running us off and don't forget, the devil won't be there to protect you for long so you better care about life after Satan.This board is going to be a lot of fun in the next few weeks. Will likely see a lot of the lib handles disappear and a bunch of new ones start posting. They can't handle what's coming.
You are entitled to your opinion but you are are so wrong. Unfortunately, that's not surprising.Sure man but I promise you that you devil worshippers won't be running us off and don't forget, the devil won't be there to protect you for long so you better care about life after Satan.
Was it Jesus that led you to post threatening messages like this in support of an evil man's contrived revenge campaign? Would he approve of your glee at the thought of harming innocent people?You are entitled to your opinion but you are are so wrong. Unfortunately, that's not surprising.
Your desperation is showing more than ever. My faith is in Jesus. I pray that you will find Him and realize that politics is not the answer. May God Bless you @dpic73.
This board is going to be a lot of fun in the next few weeks. Will likely see a lot of the lib handles disappear and a bunch of new ones start posting. They can't handle what's coming.
He has some explaining to do.
Ain't that a universal thing..."aspirational claim" = conclusion presented with confidence about motivations or intetions of an actor or group of actors when the evidence doesn't back up that conclusion.
Basically a conclusion that someone higher up wanted and/or expected to see and let everyone know that's the conclusion that they wanted so everyone does the best that they can to make the facts fit while making the conclusion be what the boss wants it to be.
I posted because "aspirational claim" was the specific term used in the document that Megyn Kelly was reading from in that sound bite. It's important to know what means. The first part of what I posted was an objective definition. The second part is probably the main reason why you get "aspirational claims" in documents. Facts don't back it up but you can't let go of the claim for some reason.Ain't that a universal thing...
Per AII posted because "aspirational claim" was the specific term used in the document that Megyn Kelly was reading from in that sound bite. It's important to know what means. The first part of what I posted was an objective definition. The second part is probably the main reason why you get "aspirational claims" in documents. Facts don't back it up but you can't let go of the claim for some reason.
No it's not universal. Professional intellegence organizations and people, if they are being professional, are very concious of bias.
I guess what I really meant was bipartisan in this sense.I posted because "aspirational claim" was the specific term used in the document that Megyn Kelly was reading from in that sound bite. It's important to know what means. The first part of what I posted was an objective definition. The second part is probably the main reason why you get "aspirational claims" in documents. Facts don't back it up but you can't let go of the claim for some reason.
No it's not universal. Professional intellegence organizations and people, if they are being professional, are very concious of bias.
Yeah ok. I don't thing that any political party has a lock on bias.I guess what I really meant was bipartisan in this sense.
Though that is certainly a thing across all politics and businesses (not universal in that every single person/business/department does it).
Yeah, don’t pay any attention to those. Trump is trying to distract everyone from his failure to release an “Epstein List” that may or may not exist that Democrat administrations sat on for 8+ years that not a single Democrat ever asked to see the light of day until about ten minutes ago. Trust us, we’re the media."