Obama/Hillary Treason - RICO

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,544
23,307
113
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

yoshi121374

Heisman
Jan 26, 2006
12,944
22,099
113
This why it's a bad idea to give power to maga Republicans - your victim complex makes you more interested in vigilante un-justice than you are in making the country a better place for all.

And they wonder why Biden pardoned his family?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,544
23,307
113
And they wonder why Biden pardoned his family?
It's so bizarre to me, they conveniently etch-a-sketch the real crimes committed by the most corrupt politician in history, then turn around and want jail time for anyone who ever understandably criticized their favorite criminal. How does one's priorities become so warped?
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

m.knox

All-Conference
Aug 20, 2003
3,337
3,381
113
Hermy McFluffins: I'm more than glad that you found your way over here. You'll fit right in with your soon to be nutty buddy, TigerGrowls.

Russia Hoax Exposed, New Era of Accountability Begins

You know, Matt Taibbi used to be a democrat... lol...

I really don't plan on hanging out on Clemson's Politics board, but you do you.... lol....

Note on New Trump-Russia Disclosures

https://www.racket.news/p/note-on-new-trump-russia-disclosures

Thanks to explosive new document releases, the Russiagate hoax is now exposed, commencing a new era that will be about accountability for the guilty

 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
24,780
23,434
113
If what’s being reported has a modicum of truth I fully expect arrests. This will be the retaliation lawfare I’ve been waiting on from the right. This will most likely get ugly. My suspicion is Trump is going to want to make an example here and get some retribution. Can’t blame him either.
I’ve followed this story closely and we don’t need retribution, we need justice.

They fabricated evidence to undo the will of the people. There was no peaceful transfer of power.

whomever started this plot (Obama) and those that participated need to be held accountable or else it will happen again.

I fully expect arrests and prosecution. They should get their day in court. There is more than enough evidence.
 

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
24,780
23,434
113
Agreeing with Matt Walsh has me feeling uncomfortable. There have been a lot of claims and a lot of hours of investigations, etc that have yielded practically nothing. And what is frustrating is if the fullness of what has been claimed were true, I would absolutely care. But it, so far, has always yielded practically nothing.
It’s yielded nothing because they were trying to hide it. Tulsi was just the one to de classify it.

it’s all there for you to see. You don’t need anyone to interpret it for you. Just read what happened. The lied. They fabricated. They continued to lie.
It’s not really up for debate.

When the arrests come you will move the goal posts again. But just read what happened. Read the documents. Read the witness testimony. It’s treason and it’s there for everyone to see.

We all know what happened. The long dick of the law will get you, even 9 years later.

No one is above the law. Not even Obama.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,544
23,307
113
No one is above the law. Not even Obama.
Except Trump - because you fanboys re-elect him so he can get away with his many crimes, which are much worse than anything your imaginary enemies supposedly did.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,544
23,307
113
It’s yielded nothing because they were trying to hide it. Tulsi was just the one to de classify it.

it’s all there for you to see. You don’t need anyone to interpret it for you. Just read what happened. The lied. They fabricated. They continued to lie.
It’s not really up for debate.

When the arrests come you will move the goal posts again. But just read what happened. Read the documents. Read the witness testimony. It’s treason and it’s there for everyone to see.

We all know what happened. The long dick of the law will get you, even 9 years later.

No one is above the law. Not even Obama.
 

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
24,780
23,434
113
Guess we’re just going to disagree if those are your examples of treason. Not terribly surprising.
They fabricated evidence (fact, backed by evidence. The presidential daily briefings from December 6th). They falsified FISA applications multiple times with evidence they knew was false.


They knew it was false ( see presidential daily briefings) and they still used that information to try and get Trump removed from office. This is treason.

Of course you are a Democrat and you won’t ever agree. You will make every excuse in the book even when the written evidence is right under your nose.

We will see what a jury of their peers (in Florida) thinks.
 

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
6,232
4,619
113
More lawfare from Cheeto Hitler. Awesome.
well, didn't Brennan admit once that he lied to confess?
No deflection from Epstein at all right?
will you be satisfied if grand jury report is released?

Don't you want those who violated laws brought to justice. Remember, no one is above the law. And Brennen did admit that he lied to Congress.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
6,232
4,619
113
We know they had credible reasons to launch the investigation
We know Russia meddled
We know Trump welcomed it
We know they hacked the DNC at his request

Nobody gives a **** about this 10 year old story that targets the defenders of democracy. You got lucky that America re-elected you un-American primates, otherwise this would have been left to the dustbin of history, where it belongs.

F you inmates
you may know all those things but Mueller didn't find any proof of it.

To your point that no one cares, seems as if Tulsi gabbard cares.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
6,232
4,619
113
Ya think? This is exactly why I enjoy monitoring and posting on Boards laden with Trump Cultists. The conspiracy stuff, among other things, is just hilarious.

So forget all about the fact that it was the Trump administration that investigated Epstein, and that Epstein died in prison in 2019, while Cheeto Hitler was in office. The real news here is that the Biden administration had possession of the Epstein files for four years, and the BCF obviously inserted in those Epstein files a bunch of incriminating information directed at Cheeto. All of it false, of course.

Here's a couple of big problems with that conspiracy fable:

1. Trump and his proxies (e.g., Ron Johnson) have absolutely zero evidence to back up that fable.
2. If, as they allege, Biden and Co. inserted in the Epstein files a bunch of incriminating information concerning Cheeto, why did they not release or leak that incriminating information? Why go through all of that unless you're going to put it out for public consumption?

This stuff is on par with Cheeto bragging about his uncle having taught the Unabomber. LOL ...
so here's a question...if there is information about trump in the Epstein files, why did it not come out from 2021-2024? It's not like folks on the left wanted to go easy on Trump. So I'd agree that likely the concept that there is incriminating evidence on Trump is false. Finally Trump knows or likely knows what's in the Epstein files (at least Bondi does). Why would he push Bondi to release grand jury info if he knows it would incriminate him?

So what are democrats so hot on forcing release of Epstein files?

Do you find conversations on this board as interesting as on blue white? Miss captain houseboat, junior, Knox et al
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,544
23,307
113
They fabricated evidence (fact, backed by evidence. The presidential daily briefings from December 6th). They falsified FISA applications multiple times with evidence they knew was false.


They knew it was false ( see presidential daily briefings) and they still used that information to try and get Trump removed from office. This is treason.

Of course you are a Democrat and you won’t ever agree. You will make every excuse in the book even when the written evidence is right under your nose.

We will see what a jury of their peers (in Florida) thinks.
All you need to know is that John Durham spent FOUR YEARS investigating these "crimes, lol" and this was his conclusion:


“[N]ot every injustice or transgression amounts to a criminal offense,” he wrote.

Durham brought criminal charges against just three people. He lost both cases that went to trial. In a third case, an ex-FBI lawyer named Kevin Clinesmith pleaded guilty to altering an email that was used to support a surveillance application. Clinesmith was not sentenced to any prison time.

The law “does not always make a person’s bad judgment, even horribly bad judgment, standing alone, a crime,” Durham wrote.

He added that the law doesn’t prohibit “all unseemly or unethical conduct that political campaigns might undertake for tactical advantage” and that prosecutors must prove criminal intent to secure convictions. That last line appears to reference the scores of allegations Republicans have leveled at Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and its outside allies.


The Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Marco Rubio also spent multiple years investigating and announced these key findings:

  • Russian interference: The report confirmed that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 election, employing an aggressive and multifaceted effort to influence its outcome and help Donald Trump's campaign. This included the use of social media disinformation campaigns targeting U.S. election infrastructure, according to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence | (.gov).
  • Trump campaign contacts: The Committee found that the Trump campaign had numerous contacts with individuals tied to the Kremlin, posing a "grave" counterintelligence threat.
  • Paul Manafort: The report highlighted the actions of Paul Manafort, Trump's former campaign chairman, who had regular contact with Konstantin Kilimnik, identified as a Russian intelligence officer, and shared internal polling data with him. Manafort's contacts with Russian intelligence services presented a significant vulnerability for the campaign.
  • Wikileaks and Russian hacking: The report confirmed that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the hacking and breaching of Democratic National Committee and John Podesta's email accounts, with the stolen information then released through WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks was found to have played a key role in the Russian influence campaign, and likely knew it was assisting a Russian intelligence effort.

Now 9 years later all the magats want to re-open the investigation that has already been pored over for years by two investigative teams to get some kind of fake retribution for a man who ultimately was not charged with collusion?

Suddenly, only because the inmates have taken over, the entire right-wing war machine is poring over every detail that has already been thoroughly evaluated to try and twist every crumb of information, every written word to twist it into some grand conspiracy to oust Trump.

How about accepting the fact that they had damn good reasons for looking into the Russian connections and just be glad that Trump wasn't charged. Get over your ridiculous victim complex that lusts to make Trump some kind of white knight who was wronged. He's not and he wasn't, full stop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,544
23,307
113
you may know all those things but Mueller didn't find any proof of it.

To your point that no one cares, seems as if Tulsi gabbard cares.
You're wrong
  • Russian interference: The report confirmed that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 election, employing an aggressive and multifaceted effort to influence its outcome and help Donald Trump's campaign. This included the use of social media disinformation campaigns targeting U.S. election infrastructure, according to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence | (.gov).
  • Trump campaign contacts: The Committee found that the Trump campaign had numerous contacts with individuals tied to the Kremlin, posing a "grave" counterintelligence threat.
  • Paul Manafort: The report highlighted the actions of Paul Manafort, Trump's former campaign chairman, who had regular contact with Konstantin Kilimnik, identified as a Russian intelligence officer, and shared internal polling data with him. Manafort's contacts with Russian intelligence services presented a significant vulnerability for the campaign.
  • Wikileaks and Russian hacking: The report confirmed that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the hacking and breaching of Democratic National Committee and John Podesta's email accounts, with the stolen information then released through WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks was found to have played a key role in the Russian influence campaign, and likely knew it was assisting a Russian intelligence effort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,544
23,307
113
so here's a question...if there is information about trump in the Epstein files, why did it not come out from 2021-2024? It's not like folks on the left wanted to go easy on Trump. So I'd agree that likely the concept that there is incriminating evidence on Trump is false. Finally Trump knows or likely knows what's in the Epstein files (at least Bondi does). Why would he push Bondi to release grand jury info if he knows it would incriminate him?

So what are democrats so hot on forcing release of Epstein files?

Do you find conversations on this board as interesting as on blue white? Miss captain houseboat, junior, Knox et al
This has already been discussed. The files were sealed when Biden came into office and the charges against Epstein had been dropped because he was dead. Plus, Biden didn't campaign on releasing the details to the public and why should he?
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
45,178
34,281
113


Christy points out an important Q drop here my friends.

If you think Q was just trolling Obama with this “claiming Kenyan citizenship” comment, when Obama is finally indicted for TREASON, you really aren’t thinking big enough.

Maybe you need to be reminded of this important story:

“In 2008, a security breach occurred within the U.S. State Department's passport office, where a contract employee of John Brennan’s firm, The Analysis Corp., accessed the passport files of presidential candidates, including Barack Obama.
This breach was confirmed by State Department spokesman Sean McCormack during a briefing on March 21, 2008, and led to an investigation by the State Department Inspector General. According to sources, the main target of the breach was the Obama passport file, and the contractor accessed the file in order to “cauterize” the records of potentially embarrassing information. Brennan’s company stated that the individual’s actions were taken without their knowledge or direction and were inconsistent with their professional and ethical standards.”

Now why would Brennan be scrubbing Obama’s passport?

Embarrassing information?

Maybe like “Kenyan citizenship?”

Now that wouldn’t just be “embarrassing.”

That would make Obama ineligible to run for president because he wasn’t an American citizen.

That would mean that his election AND his entire administration and everything they did, was UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

Think BIGGER!

Trump is going to get to replace ALL the judges that Biden appointed, including a Supreme Court justice, when it gets proven that he stole the 2020 election.

But he’s also going to get to replace ALL the judges and BOTH of Obama’s Supreme Court justices too.

Kenyan’s don’t get to run for president.

Obama is going to be proven illegitimate too.

Trump is going to completely transform the ENTIRE Judicial Branch and conform it back to following the Constitution.

And if you think this Kenyan citizenship is far fetched, there’s something else you might take into consideration.

ALL of Obama’s school records are SEALED.

Why?

What are the odds that Obama’s records show that he had a “foreign student VISA?”

Possible?

Is this why Brennan would hack the State Department to change Obama’s passport?

Sure seems like a desperate coverup of something huge.

Tick Tock
 
Last edited:

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,544
23,307
113
Bvllshit, Tulsi is too stupid to know what she's talking about and I guarantee you the DOJ will not be indicting him because this has already been investigated to death and no wrongdoing was found. Get over your whiny, white grievance victimhood and focus on making this country better for all of us - unless you prefer a civil war.

“The Senate Intelligence Committee conducted a bipartisan investigation reviewing hundreds of thousands of documents and interviewing witnesses over several years. The unanimous, bipartisan conclusion was that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump,” Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the committee, said in a statement. “This is just another example of the DNI trying to cook the books, rewrite history, and erode trust in the intelligence agencies she’s supposed to be leading.”

Connecticut Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said in a statement, “Every legitimate investigation, including the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee investigation, found no evidence of politicization and endorsed the findings of the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment.”

The FBI’s criminal investigation into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia began in 2016 and stretched into the first Trump administration. It then became the subject of investigations by the Justice Department’s inspector general and by special counsel John Durham, who was appointed by Attorney General Bill Barr to also examine the handling of intelligence that led to the Trump-Russia probe.

The Durham probe ended with no finding of wrongdoing in the handling of the intelligence, but it did end with the indictment of three people, including a former FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to falsifying information in a surveillance warrant request targeting a Trump campaign aide."


 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
45,178
34,281
113
Bvllshit, Tulsi is too stupid to know what she's talking about and I guarantee you the DOJ will not be indicting him because this has already been investigated to death and no wrongdoing was found. Get over your whiny, white grievance victimhood and focus on making this country better for all of us - unless you prefer a civil war.

“The Senate Intelligence Committee conducted a bipartisan investigation reviewing hundreds of thousands of documents and interviewing witnesses over several years. The unanimous, bipartisan conclusion was that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump,” Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the committee, said in a statement. “This is just another example of the DNI trying to cook the books, rewrite history, and erode trust in the intelligence agencies she’s supposed to be leading.”

Connecticut Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said in a statement, “Every legitimate investigation, including the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee investigation, found no evidence of politicization and endorsed the findings of the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment.”

The FBI’s criminal investigation into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia began in 2016 and stretched into the first Trump administration. It then became the subject of investigations by the Justice Department’s inspector general and by special counsel John Durham, who was appointed by Attorney General Bill Barr to also examine the handling of intelligence that led to the Trump-Russia probe.

The Durham probe ended with no finding of wrongdoing in the handling of the intelligence, but it did end with the indictment of three people, including a former FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to falsifying information in a surveillance warrant request targeting a Trump campaign aide."


Durham was muzzled at that time and given a very tight scope which will not be the case this time. They already have all the evidence anyway.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,544
23,307
113
Durham was muzzled at that time and given a very tight scope which will not be the case this time. They already have all the evidence anyway.
You don't have evidence of a crime, much less treason. I'll repeat what John Durham said:

"Not every injustice or transgression amounts to a criminal offense,

"The law “does not always make a person’s bad judgment, even horribly bad judgment, standing alone, a crime"

"The law doesn’t prohibit “all unseemly or unethical conduct that political campaigns might undertake for tactical advantage”



If you really cared about treason and the law, you wouldn't be a Trump supporter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
24,780
23,434
113
Please by all means tell us what happened. Your breathless narrative of "libtard corruption" is going to be entertaining as hell. In fact, posts like that are 90% of the reason I frequent internet chat Boards like this. How boring to read rational, non-hysterical posts from people who actually give thought to what they are writing before pushing the "Post Reply" button. With due apologies to Governor Gimp (aka Greg Abbott), "that's for losers."
You fell for the propaganda. I’d be embarrassed too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
45,178
34,281
113
You don't have evidence of a crime, much less treason. I'll repeat what John Durham said:

"Not every injustice or transgression amounts to a criminal offense,

"The law “does not always make a person’s bad judgment, even horribly bad judgment, standing alone, a crime"

"The law doesn’t prohibit “all unseemly or unethical conduct that political campaigns might undertake for tactical advantage”



If you really cared about treason and the law, you wouldn't be a Trump supporter.
Nothing can stop what is coming..
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,544
23,307
113
No but constitutional justice will be served.
The world knows that a mafia crime syndicate runs the White House so nothing that comes from this will be believed by the majority, as we know without a doubt that Obama was morally superior to Trump in every way and would never be guilty of treason, so if you want to destroy your party with this petty retribution ********, go for it but you better be prepared for the torches to come out. This is coming down to a fight between good and evil and evil never wins in the end.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
45,178
34,281
113


I’m still trying to process what just happened.

The highest ranking US intelligence official, just released smoking gun docs proving that Obama and his underlings committed treason/sedition.

Meaning Trump was right about everything, the news is fake, and the Deep State is real.

Meaning that all of us “conspiracy theorists” were right about the conspiracy against Trump… it wasn’t a theory.

Meaning the shadow war is real, and all our efforts over the last 10 years were not part of a “LARP”.

Meaning that we are not crazy. We were right.

It was all real.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
45,178
34,281
113


NEVER FORGET: Barack Hussein Obama's first victim before President Trump was @realBlagojevich - who he framed and had sent to prison for 14 YEARS for a crime that Obama himself actually committed regarding the attempted sale of his Senate seat. The Obama administration was the most corrupt in the history of our country... Barack Obama framed BLAGO for crimes he did not commit the same way that he attempted to frame President Trump in Russiagate. As far as I'm concerned, this evil man that has done immeasurable damage to our republic belongs in prison for the rest of his life. NEVER FORGET WHAT OBAMA DID TO BLAGO AND HIS FAMILY!
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,544
23,307
113


I’m still trying to process what just happened.

The highest ranking US intelligence official, just released smoking gun docs proving that Obama and his underlings committed treason/sedition.

Meaning Trump was right about everything, the news is fake, and the Deep State is real.

Meaning that all of us “conspiracy theorists” were right about the conspiracy against Trump… it wasn’t a theory.

Meaning the shadow war is real, and all our efforts over the last 10 years were not part of a “LARP”.

Meaning that we are not crazy. We were right.

It was all real.

Lol at you junior varsity Sherlocks who get all your news from Russian bots. You dipshits are being led astray.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
45,178
34,281
113


Trump was telling us yesterday to watch Hannity for this reason.

Obama is being “publicly” called a traitor.

This is going to get much bigger.

Trump is going to amplify this nonstop.

Renegade is a traitor and justice is coming for him.

Q drop
3325
Apr 25, 2019 9:20:28 PM EDT

Why would a President of the United States [HUSSEIN] assign 'RENEGADE' as his USSS codename?
Define 'RENEGADE'.
noun
1. a person who deserts and betrays an organization, country, or set of principles.
synonyms:traitor, defector, deserter, turncoat, betrayer;
adjective: RENEGADE
1. having treacherously changed allegiance.
Q

Tick Tock Barry!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,544
23,307
113
**** these people. You brought this **** on yourselves and didn’t have a problem with it.
How is that? That mugshot was taken because of a real seditious crime he committed when he tried to get Raffensberger to corruptly give him 11,780 votes that he did not get. **** people who give him a pass for that.