I'm convinced that blue bloods have become exempt from NCAA penalties...at least major ones. Hell.... UNC gave out grades for years on fake classes to keep it's athletes eligible. Yet the NCAA said that since ordinary students at times benefited from the scheme it wasn't athlete specific and thus not a violation. Anyone believe they would have found the same reasoning if North Texas had done such a scheme?
I know...BUT this one seems a little different because of the FBI involvement. The NCAA doesn't have subpoena power so it cannot compel individuals to testify and certainly can't do anything if a kid/staff member/etc. lie about what was going on. However, and a lawyer may correct me, is the case transcript available as a public record since it is not a sealed grand jury case? That may be all the evidence the NCAA needs to really lower the boom this time.
Kansas may get a slap, but apparently they think things got more serious as they have decided not to play de Sousa because of "eligibility questions". I think Louisville gets hammered on this one on the heels of Hooker-gate.