There are eight B1G teams in front of us by my count, so we're in the middle of the pack. That's not where we want to be, not by a long shot, but it's certainly better than being at the bottom of the pack!Ranking is 41 … Very nice!!!
Everything tango posts has a paywallPaywall
This may have been a "one free bite" paywall. I was able to get to it this morning (which is why I commented on it), but not now. Or maybe the website originally forgot to put it behind the paywall.Everything tango posts has a paywall
Paywall
Everything tango posts has a paywall
Think you're right I'm able to read articleThis may have been a "one free bite" paywall. I was able to get to it this morning (which is why I commented on it), but not now. Or maybe the website originally forgot to put it behind the paywall.
Wisconsin and their Writer sucksRanking is 41 … Very nice!!!
Yeah I am surprised we are playing that tough of a game . We shouldn’t be doing thatIt also looks like Ohio (#53) one behind Washington and two behind Colorado, and Miami (OH) (#63) one behind Arkansas, might not be the 100% push overs we're use to in these paycheck games.
It is such a double edged sword. I think it prepares us for B10 play, where I want to see us get a signature win, but it is also about getting to Bowl games. At this point line wise we should be able to dominate on both sides of the line and control the line of scrimmage.Yeah I am surprised we are playing that tough of a game . We shouldn’t be doing that
I will take being ranked 41, I was thinking more like 81.
This.It is such a double edged sword. I think it prepares us for B10 play, where I want to see us get a signature win, but it is also about getting to Bowl games. At this point line wise we should be able to dominate on both sides of the line and control the line of scrimmage.
My only true concern for us is how our second starting LB plays.