Game Day Operations - SUGGESTIONS FOR RU PLANNERS to stop turning off tens of thousands of fans

Jul 25, 2001
397
70
0
In the area near Brower some of this plan is under way. Records hall and Brower are gone or going. When we have a new President we may hear about the next plan.
I work for the department that is in charge of the master plan and it's definitely happening. The original plan was called Rutgers 2030 and with COVID that is probably more like 2040 at this point, but major aspects of the plan have already been built and will continue to be built. I can see the plan be revised so not everything in the original plan will be built, such as the boardwalk planned for the along the Raritan.
 

ScarletKid2008

Heisman
Sep 8, 2006
8,040
10,545
113
I work for the department that is in charge of the master plan and it's definitely happening. The original plan was called Rutgers 2030 and with COVID that is probably more like 2040 at this point, but major aspects of the plan have already been built and will continue to be built. I can see the plan be revised so not everything in the original plan will be built, such as the boardwalk planned for the along the Raritan.

I’d love to hear more about your perspectives and any insights you could share. Such an exciting and monumental project
 

Leonard23

Heisman
Feb 2, 2006
30,120
12,338
113
I work for the department that is in charge of the master plan and it's definitely happening. The original plan was called Rutgers 2030 and with COVID that is probably more like 2040 at this point, but major aspects of the plan have already been built and will continue to be built. I can see the plan be revised so not everything in the original plan will be built, such as the boardwalk planned for the along the Raritan.
Great to hear it's definitely happening. This will be a monumental upgrade to campus. We'd all like to see it built sooner lol.
 

Local Shill

All-American
Aug 30, 2001
21,524
7,329
113
I work for the department that is in charge of the master plan and it's definitely happening. The original plan was called Rutgers 2030 and with COVID that is probably more like 2040 at this point, but major aspects of the plan have already been built and will continue to be built. I can see the plan be revised so not everything in the original plan will be built, such as the boardwalk planned for the along the Raritan.
Not directing this at you in anyway but it's so typical of Rutgers that because things weren't normal for 2 years (and I'd say even that figure is a stretch) that there's 10-year delay in a project.
 
Jun 7, 2001
35,947
43,373
113
I work for the department that is in charge of the master plan and it's definitely happening. The original plan was called Rutgers 2030 and with COVID that is probably more like 2040 at this point, but major aspects of the plan have already been built and will continue to be built. I can see the plan be revised so not everything in the original plan will be built, such as the boardwalk planned for the along the Raritan.
Nooooo. We need a boardwalk along the Raritan!!
 

mikeinsec127

Junior
Feb 24, 2003
438
328
0
The bus going back to the RAC didn’t have air conditioning and the vents were off.
Bought two hot dogs from the stand behind 127. One dog looked like it came strait out of the package and onto the bun. The other looked like it had been sitting in the water from last season. The beer selection was good.
The fan base was enthusiastic, including the students who pretty much filled the south end zone.
The band looked good, but sounded like they were on low volume.
RU boardwalk was fun.
Twizzler Guy was wearing a shirt stating it was his last game.
The food in the stadium has always been crap. Otherwise a good time for a Thursday night in August.
 

RUskoolie

Hall of Famer
Aug 1, 2007
221,457
112,272
63
I did the drive the bus would do today that some of you are proposing ITT and it literally cannot happen. Easton Ave is a one lane road going dow to Landling Lane bridge and College Ave by the river dorms is also a one lane road.
 

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
114,362
53,489
102
I did the drive the bus would do today that some of you are proposing ITT and it literally cannot happen. Easton Ave is a one lane road going down to Landling Lane bridge and College Ave by the river dorms is also a one lane road.
You might be able to pull that off with 18 and River Road though via the shoulders for both.
 

Scarlet16e2

All-Conference
Nov 22, 2005
9,002
4,068
113
I did the drive the bus would do today that some of you are proposing ITT and it literally cannot happen. Easton Ave is a one lane road going dow to Landling Lane bridge and College Ave by the river dorms is also a one lane road.
College ave does not go by the River dorms.

George st. From Huntington St to Landing Lane, and Landing Lane to Johnson Park drive, could be closed to traffic and used for bus and pedestrian traffic only on game days.

Also, I’ve said many times that River road could be closed to traffic between Rt 18 and Sutphen Rd. Access to the scarlet and green lots would be via Hoes Lane W. To River Road to Sutphen rd. This not only eliminate need for a pedestrian bridge across River Rd., but the tarmac that is River Rd. In that area, Could be utilized as a game day parking lot. This would replace the parking that will be lost in Yellow and Blue lots as the planned new facilities are built.
 

ru66

All-American
Jul 28, 2001
12,175
6,257
0
There currently is fencing around Brower, at least on the College Ave side. It cuts down the middle of Brower and Stonier. I'd assume something is going on. However, I would have assumed RU would build a new dining hall before tearing down the old one.
Building new dining hall on college ave-- students eat at student center and a couple other places while this being done. Or they go to dining halls on other campuses.
 
Jun 7, 2001
35,947
43,373
113
Not directing this at you in anyway but it's so typical of Rutgers that because things weren't normal for 2 years (and I'd say even that figure is a stretch) that there's 10-year delay in a project.
The constraint as always, is money. Our revenues fell and costs increased due to COVID.
 

Local Shill

All-American
Aug 30, 2001
21,524
7,329
113
The constraint as always, is money. Our revenues fell and costs increased due to COVID.
Absolutely. But there's always plenty of money to pay the excessive amount of various "vice presidents" and senior level administrators that that university employs massive salaries with gold-plated benefits and guaranteed raises each year.
 
Jun 7, 2001
35,947
43,373
113
Absolutely. But there's always plenty of money to pay the excessive amount of various "vice presidents" and senior level administrators that that university employs massive salaries with gold-plated benefits and guaranteed raises each year.
And don’t forget the severance. We love paying out severance.
 

RU206

All-American
Jan 23, 2015
5,115
5,159
113
College ave does not go by the River dorms.

George st. From Huntington St to Landing Lane, and Landing Lane to Johnson Park drive, could be closed to traffic and used for bus and pedestrian traffic only on game days.

Also, I’ve said many times that River road could be closed to traffic between Rt 18 and Sutphen Rd. Access to the scarlet and green lots would be via Hoes Lane W. To River Road to Sutphen rd. This not only eliminate need for a pedestrian bridge across River Rd., but the tarmac that is River Rd. In that area, Could be utilized as a game day parking lot. This would replace the parking that will be lost in Yellow and Blue lots as the planned new facilities are built.
It’s difficult getting out of scarlet lot after the games. I wonder if cutting off River road where you suggest would make the traffic flow faster because everyone would make a right and the light would always be green. No need to stop traffic out of the lots for cars on River road.
 

RU206

All-American
Jan 23, 2015
5,115
5,159
113
More than 15
Middlesex county has money to contribute. They just bought a hotel in NB and build a baseball stadium in Edison at Middlesex College. It would be good for their hotel business if they improved traffic flow around NB.
 

toby83

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2014
4,095
3,822
0
Middlesex county has money to contribute. They just bought a hotel in NB and build a baseball stadium in Edison at Middlesex College. It would be good for their hotel business if they improved traffic flow around NB.
they want to get approval to build monstrosity outdoor sports complex next to the Community College
 

RU206

All-American
Jan 23, 2015
5,115
5,159
113
they want to get approval to build monstrosity outdoor sports complex next to the Community College
I think they already got approval. All turf baseball and softball fields and something like 10 soccer fields. The county is spending a lot right now so it’s time for RU to put its hand out.
 

RUskoolie

Hall of Famer
Aug 1, 2007
221,457
112,272
63
College ave does not go by the River dorms.

George st. From Huntington St to Landing Lane, and Landing Lane to Johnson Park drive, could be closed to traffic and used for bus and pedestrian traffic only on game days.

Also, I’ve said many times that River road could be closed to traffic between Rt 18 and Sutphen Rd. Access to the scarlet and green lots would be via Hoes Lane W. To River Road to Sutphen rd. This not only eliminate need for a pedestrian bridge across River Rd., but the tarmac that is River Rd. In that area, Could be utilized as a game day parking lot. This would replace the parking that will be lost in Yellow and Blue lots as the planned new facilities are built.
Then anyone traveling from New Brunswick can only access Piscataway by going across that bridge to HP then driving on a one lane road to River Road. I feel like that would be even worse. The river is the problem. Can't block 2 means of crossing it for some buses, although I like the idea. If you could get the buses on Rt 18 maybe the shoulder to the Busch campus exit could be used and then drop off would be near that welcome center in the Yellow lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletKid2008

Scarlet16e2

All-Conference
Nov 22, 2005
9,002
4,068
113
Then anyone traveling from New Brunswick can only access Piscataway by going across that bridge to HP then driving on a one lane road to River Road. I feel like that would be even worse. The river is the problem. Can't block 2 means of crossing it for some buses, although I like the idea. If you could get the buses on Rt 18 maybe the shoulder to the Busch campus exit could be used and then drop off would be near that welcome center in the Yellow lot.
Who said anything about Highland Park?
The Lynch Bridge (Rt 18) would remain the way people drive over from New Brunswick.
 

Scarlet Bri

All-Conference
Sep 6, 2001
593
1,179
93
They need someone on River Road to stop cars from turning into Sutphen that don’t have Scarlet or Green passes. Seems 75% of the cars that get up to the scarlet lot don’t have passes and have long conversations with the attendants about where to go and then try to make a U turn. Significantly slows down the process for those that actually have passes.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
88,719
86,717
113
They need someone on River Road to stop cars from turning into Sutphen that don’t have Scarlet or Green passes. Seems 75% of the cars that get up to the scarlet lot don’t have passes and have long conversations with the attendants about where to go and then try to make a U turn. Significantly slows down the process for those that actually have passes.
Similar things happen with Campus Road flow to Brown/White/Yellow/Blue/Black/(maybe purple?) lots. They would do well to have signs at exits for Brown/White, stay right. See way too many people chatting with the police (sometimes for 2-5 minutes) as to where to go.
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
I work for the department that is in charge of the master plan and it's definitely happening. The original plan was called Rutgers 2030 and with COVID that is probably more like 2040 at this point, but major aspects of the plan have already been built and will continue to be built. I can see the plan be revised so not everything in the original plan will be built, such as the boardwalk planned for the along the Raritan.
Have to admit.. the Honors College project was a very good sign in that direction. But with every big project you have the sales brochure followed by the actual results.. which end up being a shadow of what was promised.. the Honors College notwithstanding.
 

RUskoolie

Hall of Famer
Aug 1, 2007
221,457
112,272
63
Who said anything about Highland Park?
The Lynch Bridge (Rt 18) would remain the way people drive over from New Brunswick.
How is everyone getting to the stadium when you just close access to two bridges?
 

RUdude

Senior
Sep 2, 2014
1,036
679
113
If the goal is to get more students into the stadium the solution is not to tell them to walk.
1. The first solution is to figure out how to get the buses to operate better.
2. Landing Lane bridge is not the best option. It’s out of the way from college Ave.
3. Long term solution is to build a new pedestrian bridge closer to College Ave that leads to Johnson Park.
4. A small bridge over River Road from Johnson park would help the River Road traffic move smoother.

5. Redo the bag policy. Yesterday was a mess because the freshman were out all day at events with their bags and went directly to the stadium. Next game they will leave their bags in the dorms when they come to the game. But the bag check needs to move faster.

This needs to be fixed if they want to improve attendance. The place was half full last night and it was a mess. What will happen if 52k actual show up. The fan experience needs to improve.
need two bridges as noted above....get the funds as part of government handout to enhance walking trails in urban locations....

fact alot of people need bags so figure it out...