Love you Al but those are some tall order offensive numbers that you're saying we must have.
Continue to work on your delivery because right now you're a black backdrop away from having hostage video quality.
It’s not easy facing the #2 team in the country. Offense needs to do it’s part, otherwise it’s blowout City. #2 can be the equalizer.Love you Al but those are some tall order offensive numbers that you're saying we must have.
Continue to work on your delivery because right now you're a black backdrop away from having hostage video quality.
It’s not easy facing the #2 team in the country. Offense needs to do it’s part, otherwise it’s blowout City. #2 can be the equalizer.
I hope so, I’d rather lose by 100 throwing the kitchen sink than Lose by 14 being conservative.But will HC Schiano and OC KC risk 2-3 INTs by throwing the ball and give #2 the freedom to be the equalizer we potentially need?
I said it in the spread thread - I'd rather lose by 40 and go down with Wimsatt throwing the ball trying to make plans than lose by 20 because we "tried to keep it close" and ran out the clock all game.
Thx. This was roughly how TCU beat Michigan. Hope we can replicate the formula.Well done Al.
Totally agree we need to win the Turnover battle by +2 and have an outstanding running day with Kyle/Brown/ Wimsatt with 250 yards + on the ground
I’m with you rutgersal and most people posting here are as well. We will need to pass … we willThx. This was roughly how TCU beat Michigan. Hope we can replicate the formula.
Or holding Michigan to less points?I think the key to winning the game is to score more points than Michigan.
I think it is a tall order to both score more points than Michigan AND holding them to less. I am not sure we can do both.Or holding Michigan to less points?![]()
meter check heheheheheheIt was said for only one reason . If we score more points we evidently won. If we hold them to less we win.
No, Schiano plays the punt game to avoid as much risk as possible.But will HC Schiano and OC KC risk 2-3 INTs by throwing the ball and give #2 the freedom to be the equalizer we potentially need?
I said it in the spread thread - I'd rather lose by 40 and go down with Wimsatt throwing the ball trying to make plans than lose by 20 because we "tried to keep it close" and ran out the clock all game.
Maybe you should make a videoI think the key to winning the game is to score more points than Michigan.
If Michigan has not more points than Rutgers has not less points then somebody is less away and somebody is less close to victory!If Michigan has less points than Rutgers has at the final whistle forget the semantics.
I'll leave the creepy videos to you... you're soooooo good at it.Maybe you should make a video
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football announces Dylan Lonergan as QB1 - TKR Pod
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football Fall Camp: Get 75% off The Knight Report - Final Day!
The Knight Report
Statistical Profile Comparison: 2025 Dylan Lonergan versus 2025 Athan Kaliakmanis
Rivals
2029 ATH Darnell Engoto's stacking big offers as recruitment continues to build
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football names Dylan Lonergan starting quarterback for 2026 season