Mag - impact moving forward. Eye opening stats

Loyal_2RU

Heisman
Aug 6, 2001
15,278
11,113
113
Zach Edey is a unique basketball player because he's 7'4.....there is ZERO correlation to Edey and TJD.....as is none whatsoever.

If you want to make the excuse that Mag is insurmountable and RU is doomed, go for it. I don't buy it, the stats don't support that logic and the roster has multiple pieces and players that can mix and match at that position.

I will ask the same question that I asked in the other thread. Are you saying you would rather have Mag over any of the other 4 starters for the rest of the season?? If you are saying "I'm not going that far OR NO, I wouldn't say that", then we can have a logical discussion of team performance with and without Mag....

That means moving the ball, offense, passing, shooting, rebounding, defense etc.

I don't believe Mag is the only player on the roster that does what he does well. There is going to be a dropoff on defense....yes I am acknowledging there will be "some dropoff".

But I am also saying getting Simpson and Hyatt more minutes isn't exactly the worse solution in the world, for a team that needs shooting, scoring and some individual "go make a play", once in awhile.
Mag is a unique and terrific player. He is the least important of our 5 starters. I wish he was not hurt. I hate for his and for his teammates sake that he is hurt.

He makes unique contributions to the game. Now Pike has to Coach to make up for his loss in other ways.
We all will see soon and again at Illinois, how he and the team are able to adapt.
No use suffering twice, I am going to let it play out, without angst. And hope I don't have to suffer even once.
Loyal
 
Last edited:

csphi

Heisman
Jul 26, 2001
18,032
20,485
102
No, an honest reality that I hope doesn't happen. But I
expect the real losers are those who will attack the team if they lose. Are you that loser??
Nice spin

Abe attacking the team is the last thing I would do

Yet….it’s still a losers mentality
 

rubjk

All-Conference
Dec 16, 2013
2,284
4,921
113
Over the top?? How?? Responding to the possibility of losing games in his absence. I'd say responding to dopes attacking is not o.ver the top .
There’s also a possibility someone takes advantage of the opportunity. There’s also a chance of chunk of the scoreboard falls down again. There’s a chance TJD gets hurt. Lots of things might happen. That’s why I watch the games and don’t worry about 5 mins of not scoring or other things in isolation.
 

ru66

All-American
Jul 28, 2001
12,175
6,257
0
Yup. Gives others a chance to step up. 3 weeks ago, many were questioning g him starting. Too much drama. Let’s go.
I'd say a delusional mentality if you think losing Mag will not affect the team significantly--hey, just read and listen to the team /Pikes comments about Mag -they're not losers but understand his significance for winning. And I've never said I don't hope others step up and we avoid losses but it will be really sad when and if the usual subjects attack the team if we lose --they're the losers.
 

Mr. Magoo1

Heisman
Nov 15, 2001
15,519
16,370
113
I'd say a delusional mentality if you think losing Mag will not affect the team significantly--hey, just read and listen to the team /Pikes comments about Mag -they're not losers but understand his significance for winning. And I've never said I don't hope others step up and we avoid losses but it will be really sad when and if the usual subjects attack the team if we lose --they're the losers.
Of course it affects the team..such is life. Nothing you can do about it. And I never said you said you don’t hope others step up…lol. The point is nothing is changing Mag’s status. We can feel sorry for ourselves all we want but I’m sure the team is spending that energy trying to make up for the loss. This team completely outplayed MSU without Mag in the 2nd half….small sample size and I’m not suggesting we are better without him. Mag has been incredible the last 3 weeks (before that, not so much) but he’s not irreplaceable. Lack of depth will be the bigger problem moving forward. Time to focus on what we can control.
 

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
122,655
38,410
113
I predict at least 8 losses in Rutgers games for the rest of the regular season.

Relatedly, I predict no more than 8 losses in Rutgers games for the rest of the regular season.
First- this really sucks for Mags...

Now, my question...if Mags were playing- how many future losses did you have us down for?
 

RUPete

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
26,841
16,113
0
Feel so bad for Mawot and all he has endured. His loss will be felt big time on the court at both ends. Now it’s time for Hyatt / Dean / Wolf / Oskar to take the bull by the horns and contribute to the max.
Couldn’t have said it better. Really feel horrible for him. But there’s an opportunity right there for those other guys. They need to grab it.
 

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
First- this really sucks for Mags...

Now, my question...if Mags were playing- how many future losses did you have us down for?
Well, you need to read my post more carefully 😛

I’ll give you a hint: we could start the Boston Celtics or 5 posters from this board and my prediction would remain the same.
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
Zach Edey is a unique basketball player because he's 7'4.....there is ZERO correlation to Edey and TJD.....as is none whatsoever.

If you want to make the excuse that Mag is insurmountable and RU is doomed, go for it. I don't buy it, the stats don't support that logic and the roster has multiple pieces and players that can mix and match at that position.

I will ask the same question that I asked in the other thread. Are you saying you would rather have Mag over any of the other 4 starters for the rest of the season?? If you are saying "I'm not going that far OR NO, I wouldn't say that", then we can have a logical discussion of team performance with and without Mag....

That means moving the ball, offense, passing, shooting, rebounding, defense etc.

I don't believe Mag is the only player on the roster that does what he does well. There is going to be a dropoff on defense....yes I am acknowledging there will be "some dropoff".

But I am also saying getting Simpson and Hyatt more minutes isn't exactly the worse solution in the world, for a team that needs shooting, scoring and some individual "go make a play", once in awhile.
You are insanely undervaluing TJD. Indiana would be soooo much worse without him

I never once said losing Mag is insurmountable or doomed. It's a huge loss though. Meanwhile you are saying we are going to be actually BETTER come tournament time

My take is completely reasonable. Yours is not
 

BOCA93

All-Conference
Jan 16, 2012
2,951
3,710
61
I don't look at everything as an individual stat game or evaluation. Indiana is going to get evaluated based on the entire season or body of work.

Mike Woodson has 2 5 star guards before Xavier Johnson broke his foot, sitting on the bench. Why is Indiana solely reliant or needing TJD to have a big game in order to win??

If TJD gets in foul trouble dealing with Cliff, can Indiana win. I don't know right now, if the Mag injury does to the overall defensive ratings until I see what the coaches and players do to adjust their games and roles within the team concept.

It would be disappointing for RU fans to build in reasons or excuses for anything. I have not changed my bullish view of RU basketball at all. I am expecting good defense and better offense in time, because of this injury. I believe in the long run, RU will be more dangerous and explosive come March.
Crazy stat that TJD had never fouled out of a game until this year’s game at the RAC. He rarely gets into foul trouble.
 

RU-Choppin-Ohio

Heisman
Jul 31, 2011
33,065
37,970
113
Without Mag, the defense could and will change. Pikiell went heavy zone and won the game on the defensive end
 

hawkjt

Sophomore
Feb 14, 2004
31,827
137
0
Hawkeye fan just wanting to express sympathies to Mr Mag on this sad news about his knee injury. He is a very good player who will be missed.
I do root for RU and Mrs Screw who is great fan but always gracious to Hawkeye fans.

I like your coach and your players and will hope you beat I U and have a strong finish. If we meet again let it be in the BIG tourney final.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg and Duff366
A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest
In Big Ten games, Rutgers allows 14.3 more points per 100 possessions when Mag is off the court

Three-point shooting percentage (+9.4%)

Mid-range two-point percentage (+6.6)

Offensive rebounding percentage (+9.3%)

In B1G play, Mag ranks fourth in the Big Ten in both defensive rating and defensive box plus-minus, per Bart Torvik
Sucks to lose him but injuries are apart of sports unfortunately. Every team has them
 

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
122,655
38,410
113
I predict at least 8 losses in Rutgers games for the rest of the regular season.

Relatedly, I predict no more than 8 losses in Rutgers games for the rest of the regular season.

First- this really sucks for Mags...

Now, my question...if Mags were playing- how many future losses did you have us down for?

Well, you need to read my post more carefully 😛

I’ll give you a hint: we could start the Boston Celtics or 5 posters from this board and my prediction would remain the same.
based on the response- I get it know but reading your post carefully, I assume you meant to have the 'ed' on your first predict.
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
I have not changed my bullish view of RU basketball at all. I am expecting good defense and better offense in time, because of this injury. I believe in the long run, RU will be more dangerous and explosive come March.
blinking trailer park boys GIF
 
  • Haha
Reactions: GoFish2
The Knight Report

Latest

  1. 01 The Knight Report Leave No Meat on the Bone: How Damiere Shaw turned Rutgers into a Running Back Factory
  2. 02 The Knight Report Rutgers Football Training Camp: Day Three Takeaways - TKR Pod
  3. 03 On3 Greg McElroy breaks down Big Ten into contending tiers ahead of 2026 season
  4. 04 On3 Ranking every Big Ten head coach's all-time record against AP Top 25 opponents
  5. 05 On3 ESPN names biggest archenemies for every Big Ten school