Pike: Please Send a Memo to B1G Commish

[[email protected]]

F" the "it's not reviewable" rule. .


If Rutgers had 6 players on the court and scored the winning basket, R U telling me that the refs who made no call wouldn't be sanctioned...and reversed?

If Rutgers sank the winning basket 1 second after official time had expired R U telling me that the refs,, opposing coach / fans wouldn't be clamoring for an intervention and be recersed....during real time or after the fact?

We live in a era of NIL $$$$ and sports betting. The B!G is trying to land UCLA with its 10+ Basketball championships: WAKE UP AND CORRECT THE F" UP!

It was the last play that decided the outcome. Given that there may not have been any tijme to make the final basket and even if there was time, there was a clear rule violation....CORRECTthe filnal sore : .
RUTGERS 66 OSU 64.

MO
PS Who is the director of NCAA referee's? Whoever made the no call should be shown the tape and asked why? Wes there a NIL deal or bet on OSU?
OSU: home of Out Standing Underhandedness

 

[RUDave_01]

I know the rule is that you can't review it, but if you can review whether a shot was a 2 or 3 pt basket after the fact, they can come up with a way to review a player stepping out of bounds with 2 seconds left, even if it's after the horn blows and the refs let the play go.

 

[flyer1986]

they must come out and acknowledge the mistake, since this could cost us the NCAA bid no road quad 1 win

 

[RutgersClassof2004]

they must come out and acknowledge the mistake, since this could cost us the NCAA bid no road quad 1 win

Absolutely. It's a massive hit to us regardless of what anyone says.

 

[jakeknight]

At the very least they could review the clock work, did the clock start promptly upon touch after the missed foul shot, they review the final shot all the time to see if it left the shooters hand before the horn/clock why can’t you review the clock start from first touch till time runs out.