Toggle sidebar

RU -22

Z

zebnatto

All-Conference
May 7, 2008
5,071
3,818
0
Higher than I’d expected. My guess would have been -15. Maybe Columbia is expected to be really, really bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rubigtimenow
B

biazza38

Heisman
Nov 18, 2012
14,431
17,484
81
22 is a lot without Caleb. Pike also likes to play around with his rotation early in the year. I don’t know anything about Columbia but I’d hammer them
 
  • Like
Reactions: zebnatto
Z

zebnatto

All-Conference
May 7, 2008
5,071
3,818
0
Do we know that Caleb is unavailable?

Haven’t Seen a prediction thread but RU 73 COL 57 seems a reasonable expectation.
 
Last edited:
S

Scarlet Blind_rivals

All-Conference
Aug 5, 2001
4,614
4,670
62
Columbia was 4-22 last year, 1 non D1 win.
Lost @ UMBC by 38, @ Colgate by 28, @ Dartmouth by 29
lost at home to Lafayette 50-73, at home to Yale by 25
3 wins vs Binghamton, Maine, and @ Penn.
First games are always so unpredictable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg and MikeR0102
M

MikeR0102

All-American
Oct 3, 2003
16,444
5,722
113
Scarlet Blind said:
Columbia was 4-22 last year, 1 non D1 win.
Lost @ UMBC by 38, @ Colgate by 28, @ Dartmouth by 29
lost at home to Lafayette 50-73, at home to Yale by 25
3 wins vs Binghamton, Maine, and @ Penn.
First games are always so unpredictable.
Click to expand...
Need to treat them like little brother. Hopefully lot of playing time for the 10-13th guys on the bench
 
fatsam98

fatsam98

Heisman
Mar 23, 2005
43,416
37,929
113
Yeah they're pretty bad... Supposedly have a solid incoming freshman class but that's not gonna mean much game #1 at the RAC
 
R

rob kight

All-American
Oct 22, 2020
4,918
6,249
113
if we are up big, Pike will likely give 2nd string some extra playing time. Hard to hold a 22+ lead.
 
G

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Last year the numbers looked really bad for Columbia. The only green shaded category is they don’t foul…..not sure that is a positive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatsam98
K

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
Greene Rice FIG said:
Last year the numbers looked really bad for Columbia. The only green shaded category is they don’t foul…..not sure that is a positive.
Click to expand...
You can see why the one guy who had some success there -- didn't even get them to the tournament, just had some winning records -- is now coaching a high major.

They should be better than one of the ten worst teams this year. But not much more than that.
 
K

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
Everyone in the conference is a huge favorite but if I have my probabilities right then there is about a 50% chance somebody loses.

13.4 expected wins from this slate:

 
G

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
If you had even money which would you take? 14-0 or 1 or more loses?

The good news if there is a loss there is a high probability it is NOT us.

I think there is a 53.5% we go undefeated. .6 losses are because there is a chance that there are 2 or more losses.
 
RUHouston

RUHouston

All-American
Jul 24, 2009
5,180
5,134
58
kcg88 said:
Everyone in the conference is a huge favorite but if I have my probabilities right then there is about a 50% chance somebody loses.

13.4 expected wins from this slate:

Click to expand...
This is great!! Where does one find this?
 
K

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
Greene Rice FIG said:
If you had even money which would you take? 14-0 or 1 or more loses?

The good news if there is a loss there is a high probability it is NOT us.

I think there is a 53.5% we go undefeated. .6 losses are because there is a chance that there are 2 or more losses.
Click to expand...
I'd take 14-0 at even odds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg
G

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
I think I am taking the B1G to lose a game....
PSU -12 -640 (blended average of +540 and -740)
Mich -15.5 -1300
Mich St -21 -1800
Ind -24.5 -2750
MD -17 -1400
OSU -20 -1600
Iowa -29
NEB -21.5
WISC -12 -725
MIN -9.5 -465
Ill -31
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom