Notre Dame and the 3 ball

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,469
49,418
113
What is your target in terms of either percentage or 3's made that Rutgers needs to hold ND to in order to win?
 

RUChoppin

Heisman
Dec 1, 2006
19,270
13,695
0
Chase them off the line and keep them to 20 or fewer attempts - and what attempts they get, keep them late in the shot clock and 3+ feet behind the arc.
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,469
49,418
113
I was thinking around 8 or 9... double digits and it starts getting dicey

I just don't see matchups where help is needed but we always do. Especially early in the game, don't want to see early open 3's to get confidence going
 

The RUT

Heisman
Oct 30, 2011
35,952
20,312
61
I was thinking around 8 or 9... double digits and it starts getting dicey

I just don't see matchups where help is needed but we always do. Especially early in the game, don't want to see early open 3's to get confidence going
Thought I read somewhere that we give up a little over 9 3PT FGs per game away from the RAC.

I think we need to be under that and we’re okay.

Also it just depends on which RU team do we get? Are we hitting our shots, moving the ball and shooting in rhythm? Or are we trying to make this a dog fight tonight?
 

Danprusa_4

All-Conference
Aug 29, 2018
1,678
1,283
0
We need at least 6-7 if our D is phenomenal.
Or 8-9 if our D is struggling.
hopefully we make 20-30 regardless
 

Degaz-RU

Heisman
Dec 19, 2002
23,004
28,226
88
I was thinking around 8 or 9... double digits and it starts getting dicey

I just don't see matchups where help is needed but we always do. Especially early in the game, don't want to see early open 3's to get confidence going
Yeah I think 8 made threes by ND is the magic number above which I’d rather we didn’t venture.

I think I read that ND is 14-1 or something when they hit 10+ threes, and just 8-9 when they hit fewer than 10.

But I don’t want to get near that 10 line. Our perimeter defenders need to be DRAPED on their shooters. Don’t double the post. It’s the Purdue strategy from the December game.
 
Sep 29, 2006
2,048
627
0
Let’s stay right outside all of the 3 point shooters cylinders. Let cliff take care of the inside and see if they can beat us inside out. Let’s just keep our faces away from elbows.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
252,837
181,771
113
You're right. Notre Dame is a better 3 point shooting team

14th - Notre Dame
39th - Iowa

Like said they arent Iowa. This isnt an offensive juggernaut. If all they have is the 3 we are a good enough defensive team to disrupt their offense

We need to hit our shots which we are more than capable of
 
  • Like
Reactions: gregkoko

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
252,837
181,771
113
If you are disrupting their offense enough to make them take shots they might not normally take inside the 3 pt arc its a good plan. We dont want them comfortable..sometimes that means giving up some open looks to guys you are willing to dare to beat you
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,469
49,418
113
But they shoot fewer shots, and make fewer twos... and don't have a Keegan Murray as a point of focus.

Like said they arent Iowa. This isnt an offensive juggernaut. If all they have is the 3 we are a good enough defensive team to disrupt their offense

We need to hit our shots which we are more than capable of
This is my point. The only thing that scares me slightly about ND is the 3 ball. Iowa has more ways to score and an NBA lottery pick. They are also longer and more athletic than in years past.

Against ND, we shut down the 3 and it's game over. They aren't beating us without being effective from 3. I'll take my chances with them driving and trying to post allllllll day
 

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
75,960
93,111
103
Remember,
We beat Wisconsin on the road by answering every shot they made in the first 10 minutes.
Captain obvious, if ND is making 3s, we need to have an answer
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUfanSinceAnderson

RUPete

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
26,841
16,113
0
This is my point. The only thing that scares me slightly about ND is the 3 ball. Iowa has more ways to score and an NBA lottery pick. They are also longer and more athletic than in years past.

Against ND, we shut down the 3 and it's game over. They aren't beating us without being effective from 3. I'll take my chances with them driving and trying to post allllllll day
Very simply less points you have to chase. But we also need to limit offensive rebounds and second chance points.
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,469
49,418
113
Very simply less points you have to chase. But we also need to limit offensive rebounds and second chance points.
ND 330th in offensive rebounding so that shouldn't be an issue as long as we don't take it for granted
 

RUPete

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
26,841
16,113
0
ND 330th in offensive rebounding so that shouldn't be an issue as long as we don't take it for granted
As Pat Riley once said, “No rebounds, no rings.” He also talked about that with reporters saying that it’s not complicated, the more rebounds you get, the more possessions you have and the more chances you have to score than the other guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FastMJ
The Knight Report

Latest

  1. 01 The Knight Report Rutgers Athletics Roundup | Basketball, Football, Wrestling & More - TKR Pod
  2. 02 The Knight Report 2026-27 Rutgers Basketball Desktop / Mobile Wallpaper
  3. 03 The Knight Report Rutgers Football versus Penn State Game Time Announced
  4. 04 On3 Football Everything to know about 24-team College Football Playoff expansion
  5. 05 On3 Football College Football Playoff expands to 24 teams after new ESPN media rights deal