Indiana v UM

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
248,166
177,795
113
IMHO if we beat Iowa its UM vs IU for the last spot. If we lose we could be on the bubble with the loser of that game.


remember there are other bubbles, I just dont like 3 from the same conference in the same vicinity. Michigan still has better stuff than most of the bubble teams in terms of wins
 
  • Like
Reactions: DirtyRU

MLBash93

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2012
1,507
2,175
113
There's no question that Indiana losing would have been better for us. But hopefully we can make it moot.
I don't understand people saying this. No f'n way that Michigan will get in at 17-14 and RU would not get in at worst at 18-13.

With us being 4th in conference and splitting the season series, no way we would not get in and they would get in.
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
About 12 k in arena - mostly Hoosier fans. They’re waiting to explode but can’t given Michigan’s big lead.

One Hoosier fan saw me in my Rutgers gear and said “ man we haven’t beaten you guys in like 6 years”
You should have said. No it’s been only 5 years
 

Salvi's Headband

All-American
Oct 30, 2006
5,569
9,436
0
I don't understand people saying this. No f'n way that Michigan will get in at 17-14 and RU would not get in at worst at 18-13.

With us being 4th in conference and splitting the season series, no way we would not get in and they would get in.

I wish but this is simply not true. Look at every bracket and Michigan is higher than us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chrebet80

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
248,166
177,795
113
I don't understand people saying this. No f'n way that Michigan will get in at 17-14 and RU would not get in at worst at 18-13.

With us being 4th in conference and splitting the season series, no way we would not get in and they would get in.

wrong...Michigan across the board has better metrics except the overall record and the Q1 mark at 5-10

conference mark has nothing to do with it
 

G- RUnit

All-American
Sep 13, 2004
14,373
7,976
113
wrong...Michigan across the board has better metrics except the overall record and the Q1 mark at 5-10

conference mark has nothing to do with it
Besides that how was the play Mrs. Lincoln?
Besides better record.
Besides better Q1 record
Besides better conference mark.
Besides RU just Beating Indiana at Indiana!
Besides Michigan just losing on a neutral court to Indiana.
Despite Michigan now having one of lowest winning percentages in NCAA tourney history.
Sorry BAC. Get off the NET nonsense.
We are in over Michigan.
 
Last edited:

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
248,166
177,795
113
Besides that how was the play Mrs. Lincoln?
Besides better record.
Besides better Q1 record
Besides better conference mark.
Besides RU just Beating Indiana at Indiana
Besides Michigan just loosing on a neutral court to Indiana.
Despite Michigan now having one of lowest winning percentages in NCAA tourney history.
Sorry BAC. Get off the NET nonsense.
We are in over Michigan.


you are bringing a bunch of things that do not matter and you know better