What if your coaches recruiting philosophy puts other things higher than pure scoring ability?
This is an actual basketball discussion and question about how you should build your program and how you should play basketball.
A) You can build your program to ensure that it is flexible to compete against the way the majority of the league plays basketball
OR
B) You can construct a roster built on offense as the primary focus and have your roster built as an outlier vs what most of the league consists of.
I believe Iowa is what some or most fans who have watched RU basketball in the last 3 to 4 years, is offensive focused. If fans want offense, Iowa is your program to copy and mimic.
If Iowa (and maybe now Nebraska) appear to be the only 2 teams primarily focused on only offense, how well can you match up, over 20-22 games of B1G competition, if they are built or constructed a different way?? (Most of the B1G is focused on defense and rebounding, even Illinois after the 1st 2 years with Brad Underwood, scrapped their offense first play, and went towards playing defense....Illinois has gotten way better in that philosophy, vs the offense 1st path of Iowa.
The entire Pike nonsense is based on the way we play basketball, in the form of what Pike has learned under the guidance of former UConn coach Jim Calhoun. Pike is a Calhoun disciple. It is very hard to argue against following the methods of Jim Calhoun, he is a hall of fame coach.
It is not too far away from the way RU football is being built....is it defense 1st, or is it based on the wave of how football is trending with 4-5 WRs and spread offense??
Can you run a spread offense when half of your games are potentially in bad weather, windy weather and/or cold temperatures?? It is easier to play passing offense in the SEC, Pac 12 and most of the Big 12, when the weather is more favorable.
Any other discussion about Pike is ridiculous....I can recall threads when Jordan was fired on the length of time it would take to possibly or potentially be a NCAA program. I saw timelines ranging from best case 5 years and hopefully able to do so in 6 years.....bac2therac even hinted that 7 to 8 years was a length of time to rebuild this program was the ground up..
Pike completed the rebuild to that level in 4 years, this year being Year 5....it is not a completely done rebuild, there's recruiting that needs to happen for 2022 and the transfer portal, but anyone saying they would not have signed up for this 5 years under Pike, is a complete liar....