Nice attempt at trolling Knicks fans but......
- Randle if not traded will be a Knick only through '25-'26 season (player option)
- With less than 6 years in the NBA RJ's next contract cannot be a supermax - he can likely only make up to ~$30+ M
- Same rules will apply to Zion. With that said, assuming Zion can even get healthy / lose weight - the only way he can get to the Knicks is via a sign-trade, if he leave significant money on the table instead of extending with NO or if he sucks and NO does not extend a Qualifying Offer and lets him become a free agent - in which case he would come at a much lower salary. So at the most you are looking at $30M range for all three for just 2 seasons.
If I were a Nets fan, I might begin to worry about the Harden, Irving and Mills player options after this season. A 38 year old Durant taking up $55M of cap space in the 25-26 season with no other superstars could be troubling.
Oh jeez. Again with this "Nets are in trouble" thing from Knicks fans.
First it was "only built for 2 years then nobody is under contract"
Now it's "well nobody besides Durant is under contract".
If Harden/Irving/Mills (funny that now he is part of the conversation - proof the FO recognizes how to supplement the team) all leave then the Nets will have a ton of cap space and ability to sign FA.
Pretty sure having KD under contract is just a little attractive for another superstar if Harden/Irving/Mills leave.
Lets look at 25-26:
Nets - KD for $55M "with no other superstars could be trouble"
Knicks - Randle for $32M(player option) and "no other superstars could be troubling"
If I were a Knicks fan I might begin to worry about maxing out RJ and having their superstars be Randle/RJ being their Big 2 (and Fournier) for the next couple of years.