Paul buried on bench

Shell21

Heisman
Mar 23, 2004
35,264
24,880
113
I had a customer from Bayonne at the bar yesterday talking about Paul. He said Paul is too slow to be a point, not quick and can't shoot. Paul doesn't have a real position on the court. He is the type of player who is good to bring off the bench and give you some hustle minutes.

Agee is terrible. I have zero patience with big men who don't crash the boards and try to play D. Agee does neither. Rebounding and playing defense are all about effort. Agee needs to sit. And Reiber looks small and physically outmatched every time he is on the court. And he doesn't look like he has any skills.
Instead of playing Agee and Reiber, i honestly would just go small and play Hyatt or Ron at the 5. Create mismatches on the defensive end. Honestly, is playing Reiber and Agee getting us anywhere on D anyways? They both don't rebound (especially Agee) and are extremely limited on offense. We might as well create a mismatch on the other end at least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Unionst

Jtung230

Heisman
Jun 30, 2005
19,211
12,362
82
IQ… over rated. “Smart” players with no skill set are useless. He’s made some pretty unsmart plays this season
Everyone has limitations. Blame the coach for not utilizing him correctly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rume

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Instead of playing Agee and Reiber, i honestly would just go small and play Hyatt or Ron at the 5. Create mismatches on the defensive end. Honestly, is playing Reiber and Agee getting us anywhere on D anyways? They both don't rebound (especially Agee) and are extremely limited on offense. We might as well create a mismatch on the other end at least.
We did this for a few minutes last night. It might have been a minute.
 

RU_DIO

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
16,931
17,180
113
Instead of playing Agee and Reiber, i honestly would just go small and play Hyatt or Ron at the 5. Create mismatches on the defensive end. Honestly, is playing Reiber and Agee getting us anywhere on D anyways? They both don't rebound (especially Agee) and are extremely limited on offense. We might as well create a mismatch on the other end at least.
I think it depends on the team you are playing. If they have huge big men then it's hard to play Hyatt or Ron at the 5. Also, if Hyatt or Ron are playing the 5, they have to have the mentality to play hard defense and rebound. It looks like Ron doesn't always have the mentality to mix it up down low.

It's really disappointing that Agee and Reiber are our backup centers. I know some thought Reiber could be good, but I've always thought that he was terrible and too small to play in the B1G. And Agee plays like he is 200lbs and is afraid of contact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zebnatto

DHajekRC84

Heisman
Aug 9, 2001
30,709
19,818
0
He’s playing out of position.
Paul is a pesky, underrated rebounder who plays good helpside defense witb quick hands, gets to loose balls, and gets under the opponents skin.
From the wing on offense he can use his gifted passing skills and basketball IQ to his advantage.
Should never be at the top of the key on offense or defense
BINGO. What took so long for somebody to post this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mugrat86

BigRnj

All-American
Nov 20, 2012
4,993
6,750
63
He’s playing out of position.
Paul is a pesky, underrated rebounder who plays good helpside defense witb quick hands, gets to loose balls, and gets under the opponents skin.
From the wing on offense he can use his gifted passing skills and basketball IQ to his advantage.
Should never be at the top of the key on offense or defense
This
 

richthedentist

All-American
Aug 2, 2001
11,033
8,599
113
BINGO. What took so long for somebody to post this.
Question is what took so long for the coach to realize this as he was on the bench for much of the game yesterday as he was overmatched on offense and defense
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
BINGO. What took so long for somebody to post this.
I see Paul as a point guard. In what level of basketball can you have a guy who can't shoot, not a strong defender, and not a big rebounder playing a 2 or a 3? Paul's asset is his vision. He is a backup point guard.

It is like playing a guy who can't hit at 1st base.
 

DHajekRC84

Heisman
Aug 9, 2001
30,709
19,818
0
Question is what took so long for the coach to realize this as he was on the bench for much of the game yesterday as he was overmatched on offense and defense
I have no problem with him sitting yesterday. He was having a bad game. Your 2 stars also shot 7 for 23 (2 of 10 from 3). FIVE..FIVE! total rebounds between them. So he wasn't the only one who sucked yesterday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: radecicco

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
The ball does stop with Paul. It is a problem. He would do better creating with the ball reversed to him where the defense is moving to adjust and out of position. Way too many possessions where he dribbles countless times and nothing is happening
 

DHajekRC84

Heisman
Aug 9, 2001
30,709
19,818
0
I see Paul as a point guard. In what level of basketball can you have a guy who can't shoot, not a strong defender, and not a big rebounder playing a 2 or a 3? Paul's asset is his vision. He is a backup point guard.

It is like playing a guy who can't hit at 1st base.
Paul shot 58 of 121 (48%) overall last year. 22 of 56 from 3 (39%) and 36 of 65 from closer to the basket (55%). He is 4th on the team with 4 rebounds per game.
Tell me what changed? How bout how and where he is being played.

I'll never forget my first HS basketball game. I was considered by coach the best defender on the team. First guy off the bench he put me in to stop the other teams point guard from driving. First possession, zoooom . Right by me. I wasn't a point guard. I was a small forward/Wing back then (we didn't have position numbers). I was all about position, help, boxing out, etc.

His passing from the post was awesome last year. Plus his ability to get closer to the basket. Him being out top is ridicules.
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Putting him at the 3 isn't going to bring Jacob Young back.

We did beat #1 Purdue with Paul as our primary point guard. He didn't score, but he got us in to our offensive sets.

Is there a player on a successful college basketball team that has a player at the 2 or 3 for a lot of minutes that has Paul's tool box?

What is the lineup you want to see with Paul at the 2 or 3? It will either be a terrible offensive team or a terrible defensive team.

Baker and Paul will be extremely challeged defensively (forget about adding Hyatt or Jones)
Miller and Paul won't score
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
The ball does stop with Paul. It is a problem. He would do better creating with the ball reversed to him where the defense is moving to adjust and out of position. Way too many possessions where he dribbles countless times and nothing is happening
That all isn't on him....how many times has he gotten in to the paint in a great position to pass and looking to pass to others and no one cuts.
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
A bit disappointed in PM this year... he was shooting too much.. he put up weak stuff.. doesn't finish strong at all.. try to finish strong and get blocked is one thing.. but to get weak-*** junk blocked.. unforgivable.. but the problem is much deeper than PM.. he and others have had the ball at top of arc, dribbling.. looking for players to pass to and no one is moving.. no one is making themselves available as outlets, etc..

The players OFF THE BALL are to blame for much of our offensive woes.

Now.. sometimes you see players who are just not looking to pass... Caleb was the early season offender.. PM too at times.. they took up the mantle of Young and Mathis in that regard. But now RHJ is doing it.. with 2-3 guys on him as he gets near the hoop. It is disgusting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zebnatto

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
Off ball movement is also a problem, but they are mostly staring waiting for Paul to do something.

Paul was also a more effective 3 point shooter from the corners and he doesn't seem to be in those spots as mu h this year since he is on the ball up top
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Off ball movement is also a problem, but they are mostly staring waiting for Paul to do something.

Paul was also a more effective 3 point shooter from the corners and he doesn't seem to be in those spots as mu h this year since he is on the ball up top
If our rational is Paul should play the 3 because he can make 40% of wide open 3s from the corner we have reverted back to Issa Thaim days where there were default minutes at the 3.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
248,010
177,636
113
How about the ball handling display put on by Rutgers on the first possession of the 2nd half last night
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joey Bags

bethlehemfan

Heisman
Sep 6, 2003
15,113
16,403
113
Paul has been asked to do more. I wouldn’t leave him on an island bringing the ball up but he can do good things starting the offense and also off the ball. I think he and staff will figure it out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DHajekRC84
Sep 29, 2005
14,051
16,131
0
I see Paul as a point guard. In what level of basketball can you have a guy who can't shoot, not a strong defender, and not a big rebounder playing a 2 or a 3? Paul's asset is his vision. He is a backup point guard.

It is like playing a guy who can't hit at 1st base.
He’s not a point guard either. Tired of seeing him dribble half the shot clock away and then picking up his dribble in the lane with no where to go with ball.
 

YoucancallmeRay

All-Conference
Nov 3, 2015
1,790
1,905
113
My two cents about Paul is that if he had made some of his shots this year much of this talk about his position wouldn't exist. I think he should be with Geo and Caleb, with all three on the court at the same time, or two of the three, with the other one getting a blow. Paul needs to shoot and be confident with his shot. He's missed a lot of chippies and he needs to put up those shots in the lane that he's been passing out of. He should also take the foul line jumpers that he gets in the offense. Finally, he isn't as bad of a defender as some here make him out to be. PG is his best position.
 

rucoe89

All-American
Jul 31, 2001
12,885
6,718
113
I feel his minutes will continue to decrease. He’s just not playing well. The ball freezes with him
With no shot making skills of his own, he is very easy for other teams to neutralize him and our offense. We essentially play 4 on offense against 5 on defense. The results speak for themselves.
 

Joey Bags

All-American
Sep 21, 2019
5,175
5,311
1
Problem is he’s in his own head now. As soon as he gets across midcourt he turns his back to the defender to protect the ball. He never did that the past 2 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet83

cm_13

All-American
Aug 28, 2018
2,641
5,551
73
Problem is he’s in his own head now. As soon as he gets across midcourt he turns his back to the defender to protect the ball. He never did that the past 2 years.
If I’m coaching the other team and I see Paul is bringing the ball up, I’m pressuring the ball every time. As soon as he has pressure in his face he goes back to the defender to protect the ball which takes away half of the floor, usually ends up having to extend the offense out much further than it should be, and usually ends up using a lot of time before even making the first pass of the possession.
 

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
75,022
91,821
103
Play him down low as a 6th or 7th man
Let him fight for rebounds. Loose balls and help double team guys.
On offense he’s in the corner, and cutting to the basket.
He may be a point guard, but he’s better at doing something else
 
Last edited:

GORU2014

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2013
2,640
4,670
113
My two cents about Paul is that if he had made some of his shots this year much of this talk about his position wouldn't exist. I think he should be with Geo and Caleb, with all three on the court at the same time, or two of the three, with the other one getting a blow. Paul needs to shoot and be confident with his shot. He's missed a lot of chippies and he needs to put up those shots in the lane that he's been passing out of. He should also take the foul line jumpers that he gets in the offense. Finally, he isn't as bad of a defender as some here make him out to be. PG is his best position.
You could say this about anyone. If all our players made more of their shots we might be undefeated right now.

The solution to his being a bad shooter isn’t to just chuck up a shot whenever he gets the ball. At a certain point he’s just being left open because he’s not a threat to score.
 

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
75,022
91,821
103
You could say this about anyone. If all our players made more of their shots we might be undefeated right now.

The solution to his being a bad shooter isn’t to just chuck up a shot whenever he gets the ball. At a certain point he’s just being left open because he’s not a threat to score.
Not to mention the pull up jumper isn’t part of his repertoire
 
  • Like
Reactions: GORU2014

YoucancallmeRay

All-Conference
Nov 3, 2015
1,790
1,905
113
You could say this about anyone. If all our players made more of their shots we might be undefeated right now.

The solution to his being a bad shooter isn’t to just chuck up a shot whenever he gets the ball. At a certain point he’s just being left open because he’s not a threat to score.
I'm not saying that he should "chuck" up shots, but that he should take the open shots that he's been passing up. And it's not that the other team is leaving him alone. These are shots that are foul line and in that he creates by himself or off a pick. I just think that he's capable of scoring 8 - 10 points a game. He needs to pull the trigger.
 

GORU2014

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2013
2,640
4,670
113
I'm not saying that he should "chuck" up shots, but that he should take the open shots that he's been passing up. And it's not that the other team is leaving him alone. These are shots that are foul line and in that he creates by himself or off a pick. I just think that he's capable of scoring 8 - 10 points a game. He needs to pull the trigger.
He shouldn’t take them period. He should be taking corner threes or open shots near the rim.
 

Russ Wood

Heisman
Oct 12, 2011
94,313
45,143
0
His defense is atrocious , and he’s a turnover machine and ball stopper so I’d rather ride the younger guys at this point
Mulcahy? He has 17 turnovers in 10 games and leads the team with 4.1 assists per game. He has a 2.4:1 A/TO ratio. Mulcahy had eight assists against Purdue.

I've only watched 5 minutes of Rutgers, and it wasn't even 5 consecutive minutes, so I don't know how he is defensively this season
 

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
26,220
12,482
113
You could say this about anyone. If all our players made more of their shots we might be undefeated right now.

The solution to his being a bad shooter isn’t to just chuck up a shot whenever he gets the ball. At a certain point he’s just being left open because he’s not a threat to score.
The same can be said for most of the players on the team as not being a scoring threat.
 

batts

All-Conference
Jun 6, 2001
6,929
1,339
113
Mulcahy? He has 17 turnovers in 10 games and leads the team with 4.1 assists per game. He has a 2.4:1 A/TO ratio. Mulcahy had eight assists against Purdue.

I've only watched 5 minutes of Rutgers, and it wasn't even 5 consecutive minutes, so I don't know how he is defensively this season
SHU's pgs blew right past him. Aiken is super quick though.
 

Jtung230

Heisman
Jun 30, 2005
19,211
12,362
82
Mulcahy? He has 17 turnovers in 10 games and leads the team with 4.1 assists per game. He has a 2.4:1 A/TO ratio. Mulcahy had eight assists against Purdue.

I've only watched 5 minutes of Rutgers, and it wasn't even 5 consecutive minutes, so I don't know how he is defensively this season
He dribbles the shot clock down and dumps it on someone who is forced to chuck it. That’s a TO to me that doesn’t show up on stat sheet.
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
He’s not a point guard either. Tired of seeing him dribble half the shot clock away and then picking up his dribble in the lane with no where to go with ball.
again.. that is not his fault. keep an eye on what everyone else on the team is doing as Paul is dribbling "half the shot clock away and then picking up his dribble in the lane with nowhere to go with ball".

The other players have to move.. have to set screens for each other.. have to present targets for Paul (or anyone else at point) to pass to.
 

Jtung230

Heisman
Jun 30, 2005
19,211
12,362
82
again.. that is not his fault. keep an eye on what everyone else on the team is doing as Paul is dribbling "half the shot clock away and then picking up his dribble in the lane with nowhere to go with ball".

The other players have to move.. have to set screens for each other.. have to present targets for Paul (or anyone else at point) to pass to.
It is his fault because the other team knows he is going to pass. The D is sitting on passing lanes because he is not a threat to score.
 

rudad02

All-American
Nov 7, 2010
8,853
5,773
0
He’s playing out of position.
Paul is a pesky, underrated rebounder who plays good helpside defense witb quick hands, gets to loose balls, and gets under the opponents skin.
From the wing on offense he can use his gifted passing skills and basketball IQ to his advantage.
Should never be at the top of the key on offense or defense
Good analysis.