Toggle sidebar

Roster (this may sound stupid)

W

Woody522

Junior
Dec 7, 2013
462
329
0
With the transfer portal and how often guys move.

Why doesn't pike (and other programs) stop taking project guys or guys that would take a few years to develop and focus on getting transfers that could help more immediately.

What I mean by that is guys like Reiber and Oskar. Clearly are years away from being viable options. Instead it would probably have made more sense for pike to tell them to transfer and bring in more experienced and talented peices.

I know people are going to react "how dare you take a rutgers education away from a kid like they did when we all wanted souf gone" but I feel like today it's more prevalent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kcg88
O

ouchmyknee

All-American
Nov 10, 2006
3,871
6,379
91
That’s basically what our women’s coach said at media day. But how’s that working out for the women?
 
M

Mr. Magoo1

Heisman
Nov 15, 2001
15,497
16,353
113
Maybe our whole team will enter the portal. Not sure if anyone will wind up anywhere other than Cliff, however.
 
R

Retired711

Heisman
Nov 20, 2001
19,971
10,151
58
Many transfers are projects, too. That's why they're transfers -- the coach didn't think they were good enough to deserve playing time.
 
M

Mr. Magoo1

Heisman
Nov 15, 2001
15,497
16,353
113
Woody522 said:
I don't really think cliff transfers. You guys assume this because of his recruit rankings
Click to expand...
Pike’s going to have to do a lot of selling. This team will be a another mess next year. Johnson and Young hid a lot of flaws last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rume
F

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
I mean so far this team is a complete abomination. If people want to transfer, let them transfer. It’s not like anyone is any good?
 
  • Like
Reactions: kcg88
S

superfan01

All-American
May 29, 2003
8,780
8,003
0
Woody522 said:
With the transfer portal and how often guys move.

Why doesn't pike (and other programs) stop taking project guys or guys that would take a few years to develop and focus on getting transfers that could help more immediately.

What I mean by that is guys like Reiber and Oskar. Clearly are years away from being viable options. Instead it would probably have made more sense for pike to tell them to transfer and bring in more experienced and talented peices.

I know people are going to react "how dare you take a rutgers education away from a kid like they did when we all wanted souf gone" but I feel like today it's more prevalent.
Click to expand...
And when you get a project. You can spend years developing him and just when he is ready he can transfer on you.
It make no sense to take projects. But pike isn't a good recruiter
 
S

Scarlet Blind_rivals

All-Conference
Aug 5, 2001
4,649
4,709
62
So do you consider football recruits that early enroll in Jan, play spring ball and play in Sept their 2nd season? He enrolled in January 2020, 9 man rotation ahead of him & redshirted a half season(2months), played less than 50-100 total minutes due to circumstances and 8 experienced players still ahead of him in his first full season, He hasn't even been on campus for 2 years yet, let alone 3 years or 3 full seasons. People are harsh to guys who haven't really been given a chance but spot minutes in their entire career.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom