You can't be faulted for not liking the 5 years.I don’t consider myself part of the anti-CVS crowd, I’m a realist. It could be a very long 5 years - I hope I’m wrong.
Hey that's fair. I wasn't referring to you guys. I'm talking about those who don't like that she got another contract at all. Those who want to 'turn the page' on CVS.You can't be faulted for not liking the 5 years.
I consider myself a big Stringer supporter and 5 years seems a bit much for me.
I wanted an extension, but a 2 year one
That was my interpretation also. The other takeaway was that she needed to tell Politi :One big telling in that interview she did not seem to know why Diamond or Zippy left or why Gilles is in the portal. If she was smart, she would sit down with each one to inquire why? Then again maybe she did and does not want to state the reasons as it may damage her coaching. I don’t care about her salary or length of contract. I care about why talented players want to leave a legend and HOF coach. Those reasons will tell me if she will be a success or failure in those next 5 years,
Most coaches would never say why players leave.One big telling in that interview she did not seem to know why Diamond or Zippy left or why Gilles is in the portal. If she was smart, she would sit down with each one to inquire why? Then again maybe she did and does not want to state the reasons as it may damage her coaching. I don’t care about her salary or length of contract. I care about why talented players want to leave a legend and HOF coach. Those reasons will tell me if she will be a success or failure in those next 5 years,
Oh I'm very sure she knows. She isn't going to share. In all the years we followed WBB, only one player's departure was ever explained to the fan base - Dixon that left for UCLA? IIRC. And even that was relatively hazy, with a comment that "we are not California Cool, we are blue collar workers" said the day before the transfer was announced and clearly in reference to her.One big telling in that interview she did not seem to know why Diamond or Zippy left or why Gilles is in the portal. If she was smart, she would sit down with each one to inquire why? Then again maybe she did and does not want to state the reasons as it may damage her coaching. I don’t care about her salary or length of contract. I care about why talented players want to leave a legend and HOF coach. Those reasons will tell me if she will be a success or failure in those next 5 years,
You know as much as I do and probably 99% of those expressing their opinion in this thread.I'm in the pro-Stringer group here. I have a somewhat different take. I think it would be very difficult to recruit with only a two-year extension. I'm guessing Viv and Hobbs had a long talk about the transition to a new coach. And I'm further guessing that transition is basically worked out and will happen before five years is up.
Full disclosure: I have zero inside info (hell, I live in New Zealand). Just reading tea leaves here.
Makes sense.You know as much as I do and probably 99% of those expressing their opinion in this thread.
You make a great point about why the extension needed to be more than 2 years, but I feel a 5 year contract with full buyout if terminated early is to long.
I see the point others make about NCAA performance and feel Vivian must do better than just get an invite to stay the full term of contract.
Placing 3rd in conference last season shows she still has the chops to run a winning program, but it's time to bring back the glory years type of seasons again and not be satisfied with getting an invite then one and done.
Edit: Just seen a thread Heaven put up showing the terms of contract, the 5 years don't look so bad now with this in it:
>The contract also includes a clause – first introduced in the deal she signed in 2017 – that would allow Stringer to stop coaching and be re-assigned to an administrative role by athletics director Pat Hobbs after “good faith discussions.” Stringer would then continue to receive her scheduled base salary in the new role, according to the contract. The clause did not activate until two years into Stringer’s last contract, but there is no timeline in the new deal.<
Talk about a forced comparison...UConn portal transfers RUUConn has some in the portal also.
Thank you for bolstering my point. They have everything going for them yet they still had a player enter the portal. Just goes to show that players entering the portal does not automatically mean there are systemic issues in a program.Talk about a forced comparison...UConn portal transfers RU
11 NCAAs vs 0 NCAAs (Championships)
A program that manages to make money
A program that continually sells out or close to sells out
A program where just getting to the FF is not considered successful.
the program can burn to the ground and CVS will not leave and no one will force her out...she’s in as long as SHE wants.
Might as well...I hardly think we are a destination program for a true up and coming young coach. Even Jody Conradt at Texas knew when it was time to go and did not drag her time (and she won a title, went to two FFs and is a HOF)
How does 1 player, that had a hard time getting on the court, bolster your point? Uconn should have players testing the portal that have been recruited over. No team should have most of their critical components in the portal as Rutgers does.Thank you for bolstering my point. They have everything going for them yet they still had a player enter the portal. Just goes to show that players entering the portal does not automatically mean there are systemic issues in a program.
And to be fair, They have one player in the portal. I thought there were two.
God, a calm, voice of reason. Sounds like a trip out your way would be a dream come true.I'm in the pro-Stringer group here. I have a somewhat different take. I think it would be very difficult to recruit with only a two-year extension. I'm guessing Viv and Hobbs had a long talk about the transition to a new coach. And I'm further guessing that transition is basically worked out and will happen before five years is up.
Full disclosure: I have zero inside info (hell, I live in New Zealand). Just reading tea leaves here.
Just to clarify - they don't make money. They have, a few times, but, no. They are, as an athletic department, in many of the same issues as Rutgers - and their football is terrible and independent.Talk about a forced comparison...UConn portal transfers RU
11 NCAAs vs 0 NCAAs (Championships)
A program that manages to make money
A program that continually sells out or close to sells out
A program where just getting to the FF is not considered successful.
the program can burn to the ground and CVS will not leave and no one will force her out...she’s in as long as SHE wants.
Might as well...I hardly think we are a destination program for a true up and coming young coach. Even Jody Conradt at Texas knew when it was time to go and did not drag her time (and she won a title, went to two FFs and is a HOF)
Vic Schaefer is an A&M graduate and life long Aggie...he was supposed to be the take over guy...then he goes to the steers.Your Jody Conradt and Texas comparison is an interesting one.
Conradt retired in 2007, after two straight seasons where Texas did not make the NCAA tournament (and right before RU was about to make the national title game).
Since that time, they've had three coaches:
Gail Goestenkors, the blockbuster hire from Duke, who in 5 seasons never finished above 4th in B12 and got past the NCAA first round once.
Karen Aston, who coached for 8 years and recruited very well, but the overwhelming sense was that the teams underachieved; she did have four years of four straight Sweet 16s, but they missed the tournament her final year before she parted ways.
Now, the team has Vic Scaefer, a fantastic coach from Mississippi State (which has gone in the gutter pretty quickly without him)--the team got hot in tourney and rode upsets to the Elite 8; Even then, their top returning scorer (Celeste Taylor) entered the transfer portal and is going to Duke.
He's from Austin. It still surprised me.Vic Schaefer is an A&M graduate and life long Aggie...he was supposed to be the take over guy...then he goes to the steers.
vomit...projectile style. He should have his Aggie ring confiscated and never be allowed back...
There are rapidly changing times in college recruiting and coaching staffs need to be aware of the portal transfer impact and move quickly in filling roster openings when players leave.That was my interpretation also. The other takeaway was that she needed to tell Politi :
“Believe it or not, today, before I got on the phone to talk to you?” Stringer said. “Guess what, we were in the portal. We’re getting in that portal. We’re going to go with the flow. Whatever it is, that’s what we’re going to do.
Believe it or not? Really? you better be in the portal. You just lost your entire production from the prior year.
Seems like getting Jailyn Mason from the portal shows the staff isn't overlooking that aspect of filling out a roster.There are rapidly changing times in college recruiting and coaching staffs need to be aware of the portal transfer impact and move quickly in filling roster openings when players leave.
All assumptions. And really insulting the intelligence of a HOF coach. All you had to do was look at the time line. As Mad stated, they already had Jailyn's commitment a couple of days before the interview.It just shows how behind the times she is that her assistants probably had to tell her if you don’t recruit the portal you are behind the 8 ball. My Gosh, you just lost your whole backcourt to the portal. Think of all of the good guards she missed out on by starting so late.