RU vs Michigan game thread 2/24/21 3pm

Feb 5, 2003
10,995
9,415
113
Can someone rewind that to see how much time was left on the clock when Mack released her shot, and compare it to the amount of time the clock was stopped? Looked like she let it go around the 2 second mark. Was it really paused that long?
 

zebnatto

All-Conference
May 7, 2008
5,071
3,818
0
Basket made, 1.1 on clock, basket taken away cause clock expired?

If the clock paused, don’t we go back to time of stoppage and replay final seconds. You play to the clock on the floor.
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
I'm sorry.. But rebound to shot did NOT take 5.1 seconds.. They screwed us

I do think giving us the ball with 5.1 would be more fair... But if anyone has this recorded.. Put a stopwatch on rebound/clock stoppage and the shot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletteK80

PiscatawayMike

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
17,547
15,658
113
 
Feb 5, 2003
10,995
9,415
113
Ball went through net at 1.1 seconds but when did she release the shot? This isn't hockey. If she released at 2.0 seconds and it was paused for 1.8, bucket good, foul counts, no time on the clock. Shoot one FT and go to the locker rooms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletteK80

RUmaz

Junior
May 31, 2007
1,047
222
48
Ball went in at 1.1 BUT shot released at about 1.5. No way to tell if it would have been late.
 

ScarletteK80

All-Conference
Mar 4, 2003
15,885
4,520
58
Ball went through net at 1.1 seconds but when did she release the shot? This isn't hockey. If she released at 2.0 seconds and it was paused for 1.8, bucket good, foul counts, no time on the clock. Shoot one FT and go to the locker rooms.
Which is exactly how it went down. Kinda surprised that CVS/Eatman didn't make a stink.
 

zebnatto

All-Conference
May 7, 2008
5,071
3,818
0
This could be protested...I do not believe this is the correct interpretation of the rule...the correct interpretation should be Rutgers ball at the time of the malfunction so 5.1 seconds...
Agree, has to be wrong call. Imagine you’re in half court offense w time expiring. You follow the clock and score w 1.1 left. But at eight seconds remaining then paused for two seconds. You can’t penalize the scoring team!
 
Feb 5, 2003
10,995
9,415
113
You would think we could still push them to change that decision over the half. It's not like we would be delaying action. Come out of locker room, shoot the FT, then start the 2nd half. But I bet it won't be raised again until after the game is over, and even then it won't come up if we win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gigantor1024

PiscatawayMike

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
17,547
15,658
113
Can you imagine if this happened at the end of the game and the score was tied or RU was trailing by 1, 2 or 3 pts? It would be among the biggest sports stories of the day!
 

gigantor1024

All-Conference
Apr 6, 2006
6,166
3,384
0
Ball went through net at 1.1 seconds but when did she release the shot? This isn't hockey. If she released at 2.0 seconds and it was paused for 1.8, bucket good, foul counts, no time on the clock. Shoot one FT and go to the locker rooms.
It doesn’t matter when the ball went through. If the clock in the arena is incorrect then it affects when the sho
 

AZBlues

All-Conference
Sep 29, 2013
1,185
1,389
0
Are you kidding me? Home team timekeeper allowed to blatantly cheat visiting team.... If the rule was enforced properly by the refs then something is really wrong with this rule.

It appears that the clock was incorrectly stopped for over 2 seconds... Regardless, Mack's shot selection would have obviously been different if she saw less time on the clock. This call was baloney.
 

gigantor1024

All-Conference
Apr 6, 2006
6,166
3,384
0
You would think we could still push them to change that decision over the half. It's not like we would be delaying action. Come out of locker room, shoot the FT, then start the 2nd half. But I bet it won't be raised again until after the game is over, and even then it won't come up if we win.
I guarantee you Coach was thinking about the Tennessee game when the official told her.
Regardless, she knows not to bite the hand that feeds her.
Also for the sake of the team and game
better to not get a technical.
Focused on the team at the half and look at this run.
 

GL213

Sophomore
Feb 27, 2007
545
173
43
I guarantee you Coach was thinking about the Tennessee game when the official told her.
Regardless, she knows not to bite the hand that feeds her.
Also for the sake of the team and game
better to not get a technical.
Focused on the team at the half and look at this run.
I will say it again get Singleton out of there
 
The Knight Report

Latest

  1. 01 The Knight Report Rutgers Athletics launches "Rutgers Tough" fundraising campaign
  2. 02 The Knight Report Join The Knight Report TODAY and get it for 60% off!
  3. 03 The Knight Report ESPN BPI projects Rutgers Basketball's 2026-27 schedule
  4. 04 The Knight Report Rutgers Women's Basketball Head Coach Gary Redus II recaps LIU win
  5. 05 The Knight Report Rutgers Women's Basketball dominates LIU in season opener