Not sure we have to worry about what quads the games are at this point. Three more wins and we're a lock.
This is a dumb argument . The committee looks at the overall resume and it doesn’t matter if you lose 5 in a row or win 4 in a row.The committee that decides who gets into the tournament are not going to pick RU if it is close and they will cite that a team that loses five in a row does not deserve to be in the tournament.
Wow what an inaccurate statement. You know not what you speak ofThe committee that decides who gets into the tournament are not going to pick RU if it is close and they will cite that a team that loses five in a row does not deserve to be in the tournament.
What are you even saying? What crack did you pull this from?The committee that decides who gets into the tournament are not going to pick RU if it is close and they will cite that a team that loses five in a row does not deserve to be in the tournament.
What are you even saying? What crack did you pull this from?
True, but teams don't go from forty years of futility to learning how to win consistently day in-out. It takes time. Progress won't be linear for the first team to start winning. There will be highs/lows. In a few years after winning, we can minimize bad losses and consistently win. But that is after years of learning to win as a program.Really should be kicking ourselves for losing to PSU and apparently MSU as bad as they are.. you win those 2 and we're bin the hunt for big10 champion. That's 5 game losing streak was terrible
This is a dumb arguement. The committee looks at the overall resume and it doesn’t matter if you lose 5 in a row or win 4 in a row.