THE OFFICIAL RUTGERS-MINNESOTA PREDICTION THREAD

Corycord1

All-Conference
Apr 19, 2017
894
1,609
93
RU 63 Minn 61.. one of those vintage Geo games, takes over down the stretch.
 

Degaz-RU

Heisman
Dec 19, 2002
23,021
28,280
88
Myles can handle Robbins. JY and Mathis can contain Carr. MN has a horrible shooting game. We win by at least 10.

RU 74
MN 62
 
Feb 5, 2003
11,001
9,423
113
This game needs a heavy dose of Young and Mathis and their perimeter defense on Minnesota's leading scorer Marcus Carr.
This is an interesting question: who guards Carr at the start of the game if we do not change the starting lineup again? I would not change it, BTW. It is more important to start with a solid flow on offense than to have Mathis or Young start on Carr IMO. I guess it is Geo and help him out as needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rutgers25

RUKnights86

All-Conference
Apr 5, 2016
1,126
2,683
113
This is an interesting question: who guards Carr at the start of the game if we do not change the starting lineup again? I would not change it, BTW. It is more important to start with a solid flow on offense than to have Mathis or Young start on Carr IMO. I guess it is Geo and help him out as needed.

It could be Baker but my guess might be Caleb to put length on Carr to start the game. He is very good on the defensive end and this way Baker will not be utilizing as much energy on D to keep his shot fresh. I could be wrong but I think putting Caleb would be the way to handle it.
 
Feb 5, 2003
11,001
9,423
113
Rutgers wins by more than five. I don't know about a score.

It could be Caleb on Carr, that is the only other realistic option. Paul is not quick enough.
 

Scarlet Blind_rivals

All-Conference
Aug 5, 2001
4,737
4,817
62
Quick notes for the predictions.
Minnesota 0-5 on the road(in order)

65-92 2nd place Illinois(29-40, 36-52)
Led 18:02 8-6(biggest18-10) to 11:51, 18-18, Leads 6:11

59-71 T4th Wisconsin(22-29, 37-42)
None

57-82 1st Michigan(26-32, 31-50)
None

71-86 3rd Iowa(37-39,34-47)
Led 19:34 2-0 to 18:49 2-4, 1:40 35-34 to 1:30 35-37, tied 4 times 1st half
tied once 2nd half 19:00 left, Leads 1:55

62-81 6th Purdue(35-30,27-51)
19:00 3-1(biggest 24-10) to 15:34 2nd half 39-40, Leads 23:26

They have led for 31 minutes and 32 seconds out of 200 minutes on the road.
Each 1st half was competitive, they have lost 5 2nd halfs, 165-242. -77
 
Last edited:

zebnatto

All-Conference
May 7, 2008
5,071
3,818
0
I think Carr, depending who we have on the floor, will give us problems before our defense is set. Once we are, I think our length and held D will make things tough for him--let's hope MN isn't lighting it up from 3.
 

RU89

All-Conference
Oct 30, 2001
2,329
1,604
113
Minnesota 70
Rutgers 66
I purposely open this prediction thread prior to each game to see if you are going to pick Rutgers to lose. If your predictions were always correct we would be 1-16 after this next loss. Is it purposeful or do you really think we will lose every single game? I ask the question honestly and it would be great to hear an answer.
 

Scarlet Blind_rivals

All-Conference
Aug 5, 2001
4,737
4,817
62
I purposely open this prediction thread prior to each game to see if you are going to pick Rutgers to lose. If your predictions were always correct we would be 1-16 after this next loss. Is it purposeful or do you really think we will lose every single game? I ask the question honestly and it would be great to hear an answer.
Figured I'd do the work, was interested.
Here are his predictions (5-11) / Actual (10-6)

RU 72 NW 70(+2) OT / RU 64-56(+8)
MSU 73 RU 66(-7) / RU 67-37(+30) X
Indiana 80 RU 59(-21) / RU 74-70(+4) X
PSU 65 RU 61(-4) / PSU 75-67(-8)
Wisconsin 66 RU 57(-9) / Wisconsin 60-54(-6)
RU 66 OSU 64(+2) / OSU 79-68(-11) X
MSU 75 RU 67(-8) / MSU 68-45(-23)
Iowa 89 RU 79(-10) / Iowa 77-75(-2)
Purdue 73 RU 69(-4) / RU 81-76(+5) X
OSU 76 RU 71(-6) / OSU 80-68(-12)
Illinois 74 RU 69(-5) / RU 91-88(+3) X
Maryland 64 RU 60(-4) / RU 74-60(+14) X
Syracuse 67 RU 61-6) / RU 79-69(+10) X
RU 82 Hofstra 75(+7) / RU 70-56 (+14)
RU 77 FDU 62(+15) / RU 96-75(+21)
RU 77 SHU 51(+26) / RU 86-63(+23)

2020-21, 9 right, 7 wrong(6 losses were wins, 1 win was loss)
Not hard to do when most of his.posts are just predictions
 
Aug 29, 2019
511
487
0
I purposely open this prediction thread prior to each game to see if you are going to pick Rutgers to lose. If your predictions were always correct we would be 1-16 after this next loss. Is it purposeful or do you really think we will lose every single game? I ask the question honestly and it would be great to hear an answer.

Truthfully ... it’s decades of being a Rutgers fan, always waiting for the other shoe to drop. You asked honestly and that’s the answer. If you took the names off the front of the jerseys and just gave me the players’ and teams’ statistics, I’d pick Rutgers more often than not. But despite being told by my father since forever that I’m way too pessimistic, it’s how I’m wired. Hope that helps, even if some don’t agree with my thought process. Thanks!
 

RUBlackout

All-American
Mar 11, 2008
11,090
7,425
113
Just go to a zone to prevent the 3pt line when Cliff is in and when Myles is in go to man and press
 
The Knight Report

Latest

  1. 01 The Knight Report Rutgers Football Injury Report: Latest ahead of the Nebraska game
  2. 02 The Knight Report Rutgers Women's Basketball Signing Day Central: 2027 Edition
  3. 03 The Knight Report Football Three Nebraska Cornhuskers to watch versus Rutgers Football
  4. 04 The Knight Report Wrestling Rutgers Wrestlers in the latest InterMat Rankings - Week Two
  5. 05 The Knight Report Rutgers Basketball inks Top 20 recruiting class