Well That Felt Like A Loss...

willisneverrana43

All-American
Jul 26, 2001
11,102
7,105
113
. . . coaching staff doesn't get Myles out after three fouls . . .
I’ve wondered for a while whether analytics will ultimately change the way that coaches treat players in foul trouble. Not that I think that Pike was doing it here, as he doesn’t strike me as a big analytics guy.

But here’s the question: does removing a player for an extended period of time because of foul trouble turn into a certainty the very thing that it seeks to avoid, which is losing that player for a significant stretch of the game?

Now, I know the arguments for doing it, from the notion that a player is less effective while trying to avoid fouling out, to the supposed greater importance of minutes late in the game compared to those in, say, the end of the first half or start of the second half. And others.

But there is also an argument that in the long run the best way to maximize the minutes of players in foul trouble is to play them. In the aggregate, if you do so, I’d bet you’d get more minutes out of them than if you just yanked them out of the game for 10 straight minutes or so.

Eh. Whatever.
 

rubjk

All-American
Dec 16, 2013
2,341
5,072
113
Back to missing a sh#t ton of free throws, RHJ still struggling (although he came up big in the end), ugly turnovers, resorting back to one on one ball, coaching staff doesn't get Myles out after three fouls, Geo disappearing act, Montez still making dumb dumb plays, etc etc. Glad it was Northwestern and glad they missed a ton of shots in the 2nd half. Any competent B1G team woulda stuck it to us.

Also STOP throwing lobs to Cliff. And Cliff is a disaster on D. Geez. He is lost.

The one adjustment I liked was putting JY on that #1 dude, who looked like Kobe Bryant in the first half. We also did a nice job on Buie. But man, this was not an enjoyable win.

That said, it's a B1G road win. Still a good thing, but man. OK I'll stop now, this is not my style, to complain after a win. It's douchy I know, but I needed to vent, ha.


We played damn good on defense. With that we can win even with some offensive issues.
 

Local Shill

All-American
Aug 30, 2001
21,539
7,360
113
RU played poorly but less than five years ago this program was in the midst of a 31-game conference losing streak. Winning a game was almost impossible. Winning 3 in a row was a complete fantasy. Enjoy the W!
 

NY AGENTMAN

Senior
Dec 10, 2005
1,910
795
0
Wow. A road win in the Big Ten is awesome, I don’t care who you are playing. Some of you fans act like Rutgers is Duke. Think back 3-4 years ago and how happy u would be for any win.
 

RAC’emUp

All-Conference
Jul 20, 2011
2,208
2,564
57
I’ve wondered for a while whether analytics will ultimately change the way that coaches treat players in foul trouble. Not that I think that Pike was doing it here, as he doesn’t strike me as a big analytics guy.

But here’s the question: does removing a player for an extended period of time because of foul trouble turn into a certainty the very thing that it seeks to avoid, which is losing that player for a significant stretch of the game?

Now, I know the arguments for doing it, from the notion that a player is less effective while trying to avoid fouling out, to the supposed greater importance of minutes late in the game compared to those in, say, the end of the first half or start of the second half. And others.

But there is also an argument that in the long run the best way to maximize the minutes of players in foul trouble is to play them. In the aggregate, if you do so, I’d bet you’d get more minutes out of them than if you just yanked them out of the game for 10 straight minutes or so.

Eh. Whatever.
Well put. If you go back as far as I do you can remember when coaches let players play until the third foul in the first half.
 

RUfanSinceAnderson

All-Conference
Jan 31, 2006
7,875
4,012
85
Back to missing a sh#t ton of free throws, RHJ still struggling (although he came up big in the end), ugly turnovers, resorting back to one on one ball, coaching staff doesn't get Myles out after three fouls, Geo disappearing act, Montez still making dumb dumb plays, etc etc. Glad it was Northwestern and glad they missed a ton of shots in the 2nd half. Any competent B1G team woulda stuck it to us.

Also STOP throwing lobs to Cliff. And Cliff is a disaster on D. Geez. He is lost.

The one adjustment I liked was putting JY on that #1 dude, who looked like Kobe Bryant in the first half. We also did a nice job on Buie. But man, this was not an enjoyable win.

That said, it's a B1G road win. Still a good thing, but man. OK I'll stop now, this is not my style, to complain after a win. It's douchy I know, but I needed to vent, ha.
UM NO- a win is a WIN
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yeah Baby

Yeah Baby

All-American
Aug 14, 2001
19,261
6,466
0
A win never feels like a loss. I love to win and hate to lose. Individual players can be tough on themselves for 24 hours but no fans should be pouting after a win. Ever.
 

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
75,998
93,140
103
All of us have to admit we’re maddening to watch.
My supply of pillows I throw at the my TV has to be refreshed multiple times during our standard win.
Hell we best MSU by 30 and still went through my pillow supply....lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yeah Baby

ScarletKid2008

Heisman
Sep 8, 2006
8,096
10,679
113
Remember when these two things would’ve been season defining achievements:

winning 3 conference games in a row
Winning a road game

Pretty amazing to think back to that being only 2 seasons ago
 

Dpgru

All-Conference
Jan 17, 2015
4,603
4,761
0
Did you miss a two minute stretch in the second half where we missed (IIRC) the front end of five one-and-one opportunities. Potential 10 points where we got zero.

It might have been four front end misses in that stretch...potential for 8 points and got zero.
Kept them within reach.
We missed all three front ends of the one and ones in the second half. 0 out of a potential 6 points. There are only three 1&1 opportunities after you get in the bonus. Then the bonus is two shots. Our foul shooting will cost us as the season progresses and in the post season. No doubt about it.
 

Yeah Baby

All-American
Aug 14, 2001
19,261
6,466
0
We missed all three front ends of the one and ones in the second half. 0 out of a potential 6 points. There are only three 1&1 opportunities after you get in the bonus. Then the bonus is two shots. Our foul shooting will cost us as the season progresses and in the post season. No doubt about it.
A few guys struggle from the line right now. They were the guys who took those shots. They have to keep working on it. Run sprints and take foul shots. Repeat.
 

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
75,998
93,140
103
Remember when these two things would’ve been season defining achievements:

winning 3 conference games in a row
Winning a road game

Pretty amazing to think back to that being only 2 seasons ago
I agree.
One thing I also remember.
With Eugene, Doorson and Carter, we didn’t win a whole lot, but we had respect.
Those three guys beat the **** out of you and whoever we played knew they were in a tough game.
Pike was changing the culture right there,
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletKid2008
The Knight Report

Latest

  1. 01 The Knight Report Rutgers Football safety Chris Joines out for rest of 2026 season
  2. 02 The Knight Report Rutgers Basketball HC Brandin Knight's Bryant Postgame Press Conference
  3. 03 The Knight Report Staff Predictions for Rutgers Football versus Nebraska
  4. 04 The Knight Report Rutgers Basketball defeats Bryant behind Davis' Second Half Burst
  5. 05 The Knight Report Potential Transfer Portal Targets for Rutgers Football in 2027: Quarterbacks