It wasn't just that. Many of those misses was on a front end of a one and one. If we at least made some of those, we would've won the game. This has to change. We are capable. Against Purdue we hit 82% from the charity stripe. We can do it again.4 of 12 game
It wasn't just that. Many of those misses was on a front end of a one and one. If we at least made some of those, we would've won the game. This has to change. We are capable. Against Purdue we hit 82% from the charity stripe. We can do it again.
Front end miss should be consider 0-2It wasn't just that. Many of those misses was on a front end of a one and one. If we at least made some of those, we would've won the game. This has to change. We are capable. Against Purdue we hit 82% from the charity stripe. We can do it again.
Yes, but enough to win. You're right though, I overstated it when I used the word "many."Front end miss should be consider 0-2
Great points. Especially Tez. There's no reason he can't be better from the FT line. What hurt us yesterday was Ron missed both of his FT's when he had two shots. I thought Ron was really off yesterday in all aspects of his game. I'm hoping it's just an anomaly. Johnson--well is Johnson. His FT shooting is what it is. It's all mental, because his stroke is not bad.+1 on the font end comment. Those are killers.
As far as being capable, it really depends on who's going to the line. Against Purdue, 10 of 17 free throws were from Geo or Young. I'm confident those guys (and probably Mulcahy) can hit at a high clip. The problem is most games, Tez, Harper and Johnson wind up taking most of our FTs and they are just not good at it. Until those guys improve, I don't see this changing much. We just need to hope they get hot (Tez was 2-2 against Purdue) in key situations when we need it.