Grade out Schiano 2.0.

Nov 10, 2003
11,777
3,298
0
Using what Ash left him to work with, develop and buy into his system. A
In game coaching and halftime adjustments B
Strength and conditioning of the roster A
Changing the perception of the entire program, Nationally & Locally A
Recruiting and use of transfers before 1st game & Early Signing Period A
Utilizing his Assistant coaches to their fullest during practice & games A
Engaging the media unlike dull Ash to help sell the program A
Overall feeling on the season and Greg moving the program forward A
 
Last edited:

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
122,475
38,215
113
Using what Ash left him to work with, develop and buy into his system. A
In game coaching and halftime adjustments B
Strength and conditioning of the roster A
Changing the perception of the entire program, Nationally & Locally A
Recruiting and use of transfers before 1st game & Early Signing Period A
Utilizing his Assistant coaches to their fullest during practice & games A
Engaging the media unlike dull Ash to help sell the program A
Overall feeling on the season and Greg moving the program forward A
I can't find a way to disagree. I want to try not to sound like the Scarlet glasses are on but maybe just a C+ for adjustments
 

RU848789

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
65,228
44,302
113
Troll or idiot? Which is it? Has to be troll, because there's nobody with a brain who can't see the improvement in RU this year. Last year we averaged 5.7 points per game and gave up 39.4 points per game, a differential of 33.7 ppg, while this year we averaged 26.7 points a game and gave up 32.1 points per game, a differential of 7.0 ppg. That means we improved by almost 27 points per game, which is unheard of in one season. Those are at least "A" numers and maybe even National COTY numbers, not "D" numbers.

Edited to remove trolling comments.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

RUinPAC10land

All-Conference
Jul 30, 2011
4,408
2,159
0
A-

Plus: The offensive line and defensive just wasn't good enough, but he found ways to make this team appear competitive in many games. He did this with a team that was embarrassingly bad under the previous full time HC. The recruiting class is a lot better than any class compared to the previous HC. Obviously, the perception of the team changed which also allowed him to bring in a lot of transfers who contributed to the team.

Minuses: His stubborn nature at the QB position was costly in the game against Illinois (where Vedral clearly did not have it). His lack of trust with Sitkowski (when Vedral was hurt) has probably hurt his development. It was pretty clear that opponents have figured out the Langan package, but he still went to it. However, he was trying to figure out what worked and probably saw things in practice that led to these decisions. Therefore, the minuses were not awful which leads me to the grade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillyC80

srru86

All-Conference
Jul 25, 2001
17,880
4,199
113
in terms of trend in a graphic presentation, rather than a letter grade.
Relative movement counts.

 

KnightFan

All-Conference
Dec 30, 2008
1,831
1,845
113
We lost 6 games by a total of 70 points and 3 of those by a total of 16.

All this with shortened time to practice before the season.

Last year we lost by 52 to Michigan

I'm giving Greg an A
 
Sep 29, 2005
14,051
16,131
0
I don’t see how anyone can give Schiano and staff anything less than an A. Did you have any interest in games the past two years? How many times did you walk out at half time to go tailgate or just leave early to go home? Heck, one game last year we came, tailgated and when game started went home. Even two games this year where we weren’t competitive were different. OSU game was entertaining to the end and PSU was only a one score game in third quarter. Last year both would have been 50-0 scores. And they did this with mostly same roster. They get an A in my grade book.
 

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
122,475
38,215
113
I don’t see how anyone can give Schiano and staff anything less than an A. Did you have any interest in games the past two years? How many times did you walk out at half time to go tailgate or just leave early to go home? Heck, one game last year we came, tailgated and when game started went home. Even two games this year where we weren’t competitive were different. OSU game was entertaining to the end and PSU was only a one score game in third quarter. Last year both would have been 50-0 scores. And they did this with mostly same roster. They get an A in my grade book.
In Ash's last two years, I would usually DVR the games and then do things with the family with full intention of watching the games when I got home...That was bad enough in itself...But then, in at least 10 games each year, I would never even get through the first quarter if I even watched at all and just deleted the recordings.
This year- I still recorded the games while watching on Sling - just so I could pause at times and then catch up...But did not miss a single second of any game this year.
The best part about it- in most games- you had to watch each game right until the end.

The only part of Greg's game I give him less than an A is the in game and halftime adjustments. He had a couple of games that he mastered it and outcoached the other guy- including OSU, but others, he was taken to the woodshed with in game adjustments. But, there is a part of me that realizes that with limited practices before the season and the serious lack of depth on the team- we were very limited in what we could adjust.

Next year will take Greg's best performance yet. If he had a horrible year and was blown out in games, he would have gotten a pass this year and hope in year 2 he could have done what he did this year. But, with his and the team performance THIS year, he jumped a year. I don't know if it will amount to a bowl or a ton of wins but if we witness a let down next year- it would be unacceptable.
 
  • Love
Reactions: beaced_rivals

[email protected]

All-American
Jun 24, 2001
28,586
6,762
113
I will not grade him except to say he is someone that is an excellent representative of the school.


IMO He was the face of Rutgers football from 2005-2012 ...and even when he wasn't here.

Now that he's back...the older, kinder, gentler, wiser, less intense (at times), funnier, more humble, more GREGarious, more accessible to the press version is a home run. Period.

The culture is changings and the results we all want will come in time.

MO
 

rucoe89

All-American
Jul 31, 2001
12,942
6,787
113
Using what Ash left him to work with, develop and buy into his system. A
In game coaching and halftime adjustments B
Strength and conditioning of the roster A
Changing the perception of the entire program, Nationally & Locally A
Recruiting and use of transfers before 1st game & Early Signing Period A
Utilizing his Assistant coaches to their fullest during practice & games A
Engaging the media unlike dull Ash to help sell the program A
Overall feeling on the season and Greg moving the program forward A
Managing Team Through Covid: A+
Upgrading Roster Talent: B (great work on DL and servicable QB; weaker on OL and TE)
Team Development: A (LB, DB and WR all showed noticable improvement)
Recruiting: B+ (will know more in next year to two for 2020 and 2021 classes, but strong contributors in Max Melton, Victor K, Bryan Felter beginning to emerge; significant update of talent coming in but just missed on couple of top 2021 players - overall very solid).
Game Day Coaching: B+ (significant improvements on both sides of the ball, but some tough performances such as Penn State)
Strength/Conditioning: A (though need more improvement for OL)
Overall program direction after 1 year: A

Key offseason moves: Further upgrade at QB, OL. DL also, but recent transfer checks that off, though may need one more given Dwumfore going pro and unclear if Barrow returns.
 

SkilletHead2

All-American
Sep 30, 2005
24,458
9,296
113
To me, the staff hiring had some major hits but some misses as well. B+
Recruiting is kind of the same thing. Some good gets, but some real misses. B
Game day coaching. WAY UP over last year. B+ for reality, A when you factor in improvement.
Excitement generated, putting us back into play, trusting assistants, beginning the restoration of respect. A+
 
  • Like
Reactions: RW90

phlop87

Senior
Aug 6, 2003
1,358
907
113
Troll or idiot? Which is it? Has to be troll, because there's nobody with a brain who can't see the improvement in RU this year. Last year we averaged 5.7 points per game and gave up 39.4 points per game, a differential of 33.7 ppg, while this year we averaged 26.7 points a game and gave up 32.1 points per game, a differential of 7.0 ppg. That means we improved by almost 27 points per game, which is unheard of in one season. Those are at least "A" numers and maybe even National COTY numbers, not "D" numbers.
And he did it all with o spring practice or a true Summer camp. Imagine installing a new Off and Def with a whole new staff with the benefit of spring practice You a r to e impressed by that
 
Apr 8, 2002
15,636
27,049
113
Very happy, extremely happy with this year. However, next year is the grade I’m concerned about. This year had so many variables. Lets see next year after all teams have spring ball(hopefully) and a full summer camp.
Did you come to this decision before hearing guys like O3, Melton, and others decided to return? If Rutgers gets an upgrade at QB through the portal, how does that impact your views? Remember, Rutgers will have spring ball and a full summer camp too.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,676
12,953
78
A+ grades all around except the game day coaching for the Illinois game. We should’ve won that game. We were better than them but failed to be able to stop the QB draw. Only disappointing loss of the season from a prep perspective.

We were just beat up by the end of the season going up against teams that had more depth in the trenches (except Maryland which we won). Can’t blame coaches for that - I don’t think it mattered what they did in the PSU or Nebraska games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jreinsdorf

jreinsdorf

All-Conference
Jun 28, 2006
36,174
1,946
0
A+ grades all around except the game day coaching for the Illinois game. We should’ve won that game. We were better than them but failed to be able to stop the QB draw. Only disappointing loss of the season from a prep perspective.

We were just beat up by the end of the season going up against teams that had more depth in the trenches (except Maryland which we won). Can’t blame coaches for that - I don’t think it mattered what they did in the PSU or Nebraska games.
I agree. The Illinois game, up 10, at home, against a team not at full strength, was the only loss that I had trouble with. And I can more than live with that. Can't believe a 3-6 season felt so...fun again.