Bullets? You are acting like cliff is the second coming of Jesus. Khalil Whitney was better coming out of Roselle average 3 points a game at Kentucky, Isaiah Briscoe better than cliff out of Roselle was a good two year player at Kentucky and went Undrafted, naz reid better than cliff at Roselle had a good year at LSU went undrafted, Tyler Roberson better than cliff at Roselle good career at Syracuse went Undrafted.....
The list goes on of guys that were ranked higher by the scouting services and go onto have ok careers in college and go undrafted...
I hope cliff is great and exceeds all expectations but to think year one he will be blowing away the big 10 is a little much..
only time will tell.
Never said Cliff was the second coming of Jesus, but based on his potential Cliff's ceiling is higher than Haarms. Why is it you continue to change the POV when you don't have an answer? First, it was Haarms played for Purdue which was an elite 8 teams. You were dismissed by a few posters as that wasn't a valid reason for him to come to Rutgers. Next, you talked about his stats. Again, when it was pointed out they decreased every year at Purdue, so you moved on to another angle. Which leads us to now. Cliff isn't the second coming of Jesus.
The bottom line, you really don't understand college sports on any level. Once you grasp that aspect of things, then you'll start to learn each situation is different. You can't take one example and copy and paste it to another. Haarms doesn't fit Rutger's' style or culture. Cliff doesn't have to be like the others you've mentioned. Cliff's importance to the program is a cultural thing, local kids stay home and win. Whatever he gives Rutgers this year is gravy. For now, Cliff only has fit in with his Rutgers teammates. Those Roselle players you've mentioned ran to the spotlight and found out "me first" doesn't translate well at breeding schools especially early in your career.
