Guess the spread for the Michigan game

NewJerseyHawk

Heisman
Jan 11, 2007
24,946
40,108
113
Simpson playing or not playing will have no impact on the spread. Michigan is a system program based on moving the ball, passing, cutting and creating space for 3s.

Neutral court for both teams....my guess is RU -1
 

RUsojo

Heisman
Dec 17, 2010
30,171
29,606
113
Simpson playing or not playing will have no impact on the spread. Michigan is a system program based on moving the ball, passing, cutting and creating space for 3s.

Neutral court for both teams....my guess is RU -1

Yup.
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Simpson playing or not playing will have no impact on the spread. Michigan is a system program based on moving the ball, passing, cutting and creating space for 3s.

Neutral court for both teams....my guess is RU -1

You are Michigan and you are playing Rutgers and Montez Mathis and Jacob Young are guarding the primary ball handler. Aren't you a little concerned not having Simpson being that guy.

David DeJulius or Eli Brooks can do fine vs. Cam Mack and Nebraska. I think Mathis is a major disruptor of a half court offense if there is no Simpson.

I'd be shocked if there isn't at least a 3 point difference in the spread. We probably will never know.
 

RU848789

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
65,459
44,500
113
You are Michigan and you are playing Rutgers and Montez Mathis and Jacob Young are guarding the primary ball handler. Aren't you a little concerned not having Simpson being that guy.

David DeJulius or Eli Brooks can do fine vs. Cam Mack and Nebraska. I think Mathis is a major disruptor of a half court offense if there is no Simpson.

I'd be shocked if there isn't at least a 3 point difference in the spread. We probably will never know.
Agree with you - Simpson is a difference maker worth at least 2-3 points in the spread. The other question is Livers - some speculating he reinjured the groin and could be out for several more games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg and thegock

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
I hate to even say this.....Michigan has not been good in B1G play. I can't see how we wouldn't be favored.

They are 3-6 in B1G.

1 was Nebraska
1 was Purdue at home and it took 2 OTs
1 was Iowa 103-91 they were 10-24 from 3 and Iowa was 3-15

When I think Michigan and Howard as their coach I think Eddie Jordan, Chris Mullin and Patrick Ewing.....maybe that isnt fair.
 

kapyoche

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2010
5,151
1,509
0
Who cares what the line is or what ESPN thinks?
Just go there and focus on the fundas and you win.
I don't gamble so I never paid attention to all this nonsense before the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IBleedScarlet

SirScarlet

Heisman
Jun 27, 2001
27,965
45,992
113
Simpson playing or not playing will have no impact on the spread. Michigan is a system program based on moving the ball, passing, cutting and creating space for 3s.

Neutral court for both teams....my guess is RU -1

you are right...BUT...I'd rather he doesn't play.

and I think Howard should give Livers a few more days to rest up his groin. he should be fine to start playing again by Sunday morning ;)
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,476
49,465
113
I cant believe anyone thinks Michigan would be favored. Why would they be? That wouldn't make any sense at all
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,476
49,465
113
Simpson playing or not playing will have no impact on the spread. Michigan is a system program based on moving the ball, passing, cutting and creating space for 3s.

Neutral court for both teams....my guess is RU -1
Simpson not playing will 100% impact the spread. Even if you dont think Vegad will factor it into the initial line, it will change how both the public and professionals bet on the game
 
  • Like
Reactions: thegock

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,476
49,465
113
I hate to even say this.....Michigan has not been good in B1G play. I can't see how we wouldn't be favored.

They are 3-6 in B1G.

1 was Nebraska
1 was Purdue at home and it took 2 OTs
1 was Iowa 103-91 they were 10-24 from 3 and Iowa was 3-15

When I think Michigan and Howard as their coach I think Eddie Jordan, Chris Mullin and Patrick Ewing.....maybe that isnt fair.
What do you think the spread would be if we swapped resumes and Michigan was 16-5? Would people be saying Rutgers should be favored? Michigan has done nothing to make a case to be favored in this game
 
  • Like
Reactions: bossnj1

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
Michigan bettors will make it Michigan -3.5

check this out.. history shows Michigan disappoints bettors against the spread where Rutgers tends to win bets

Also looks like we are a risky 50/50 bet for the over/unders.. we seem to be 10 and 10.. 10 games over and 10 games under. Vegas oddsmakers must love that. But even without seeing the line I think we're gonna be OVER.. but teams will be PUMPED to play at MSG.
 
Last edited:

toby83

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2014
4,095
3,823
0
Michigan bettors make it Michigan -2.5
Agree right around here

Michigan was 4.5 faves at Penn State about a week ago. When we hosted Penn State couple weeks back, Penn State was favored by a point. True we have proven ourselves more since, but you get the idea
 

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
17,383
15,955
72
Pickem on a neutral site but this is like a half-home game for RU, so I’ll say RU -1.5 or -2. Could be as high as -2.5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
I bet on Rutgers to win the title at +20000 before the season. Should be able to hedge out on that and make some money
Not a gambler.. but how do you hedge that? Place a bet on ANYONE but Rutgers winning it? Not sure I get it. If we get into the tourney and, say, make the sweet 16.. maybe. Just not sure what kind of bet can be placed to hedge that.
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,476
49,465
113
Not a gambler.. but how do you hedge that? Place a bet on ANYONE but Rutgers winning it? Not sure I get it. If we get into the tourney and, say, make the sweet 16.. maybe. Just not sure what kind of bet can be placed to hedge that.
When you get really really good odds like this you have a lot of room to hedge. At +20000, 5 bucks gets you 1000. In the first round I could bet against Rutgers. If Rutgers, loses I would win money overall even if I only bet 10 bucks. If Rutgers wins, now I've bet a total of 15 bucks with a shot at 1000. Etc etc. Hopefully, that makes sense. I am not a complete expert but that's the general concept.
 

Ruthinking

All-Conference
Aug 7, 2011
2,188
2,014
113
Michigan bettors will make it Michigan -3.5

check this out.. history shows Michigan disappoints bettors against the spread where Rutgers tends to win bets

Also looks like we are a risky 50/50 bet for the over/unders.. we seem to be 10 and 10.. 10 games over and 10 games under. Vegas oddsmakers must love that. But even without seeing the line I think we're gonna be OVER.. but teams will be PUMPED to play at MSG.
Interesting link there. Thanks. Don’t know why they show us 15-1 at home straight up however. But I hope you’re right about Mich bettors...would love to take their money.
 
The Knight Report

Latest

  1. 01 The Knight Report Rutgers Football safety Chris Joines out for rest of 2026 season
  2. 02 The Knight Report Rutgers Basketball HC Brandin Knight's Bryant Postgame Press Conference
  3. 03 The Knight Report Staff Predictions for Rutgers Football versus Nebraska
  4. 04 The Knight Report Rutgers Basketball defeats Bryant behind Davis' Second Half Burst
  5. 05 The Knight Report Potential Transfer Portal Targets for Rutgers Football in 2027: Quarterbacks