Let’s go Pitt!!

Feb 5, 2003
10,980
9,385
113
Pitt was royally SCREWED by the refs on a phantom over the back call where the tip in would have tied the game with 21.6 seconds left in OT, and now they are going to lose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goru7

HallX2

Senior
Mar 25, 2005
2,644
847
73
Pitt was royally SCREWED by the refs on a phantom over the back call where the tip in would have tied the game with 21.6 seconds left in OT, and now they are going to lose.

Amazing thing there is no such foul as “over the back”. It’s a push. And often whistled based solely on position of the players and not whether there was actually contact.
 

czxqa

All-American
Oct 31, 2008
8,642
6,877
113
Still, a 5 point overtime loss to the #11 is not a bad loss at all for an unranked team.
 

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,437
7,731
113
Pitt was royally SCREWED by the refs on a phantom over the back call where the tip in would have tied the game with 21.6 seconds left in OT, and now they are going to lose.
Was a deciding call and the Pitt guy did not go over anyone’s back as he just reached out and tipped it in. Criminal as it cost Pitt a chance for the upset. They were leading the whole game. Pitt will not be a bad loss by the end of the year.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
248,806
178,325
113
Pitt is likely NOT going to the tourney and will probably finish 500 at best in the ACC and possibly below...they will not drop out of Q2 tho so it will not be a bad loss but its not like they will contend for a ncaa bid either
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Wolv RU

Scarlet83

Heisman
Feb 4, 2004
9,533
10,674
103
Pitt is likely going to the tourney and will probably finish 500 at best in the ACC and possibly below...they will not drop out of Q2 tho so it will not be a bad loss but its not like they will contend for a ncaa bid either

So Pitt will likely NCAA dance while they are .500 or worse in the ACC? And so many on here think a .500 B1G Rutgers team will not be in the NCAAs, even with so many top 30 or 40 NET B1G teams.

Hmmm. That does not compute.
 

Scarlet83

Heisman
Feb 4, 2004
9,533
10,674
103
So Pitt will likely NCAA dance while they are .500 or worse in the ACC? And currently in the 70s in the NET ratings? And so many on here think a .500 B1G Rutgers team will not be in the NCAAs, with a NET of 30 and even with so many top 30 or 40 NET B1G teams for Rutgers to play.

Hmmm. That does not compute.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
248,806
178,325
113
So Pitt will likely NCAA dance while they are .500 or worse in the ACC? And so many on here think a .500 B1G Rutgers team will not be in the NCAAs, even with so many top 30 or 40 NET B1G teams.

Hmmm. That does not compute.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
248,806
178,325
113
So Pitt will likely NCAA dance while they are .500 or worse in the ACC? And so many on here think a .500 B1G Rutgers team will not be in the NCAAs, even with so many top 30 or 40 NET B1G teams.

Hmmm. That does not compute.

That was a bad edit by me..Pitt will not be a ncaa team. Thats what i intend to say. Read my last sentence
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet83