Let’s not get ahead of ourselves. We are better with Geo - but boy if we can develop others in his absence...
Because everyone has to step up to replace what Geo brings, and McC and Young stepped up big time.
Imagine how awesome we'll be when Geo is back!!
(This thread is for you, Numbers.)
Because everyone has to step up to replace what Geo brings, and McC and Young stepped up big time.
Imagine how awesome we'll be when Geo is back!!
(This thread is for you, Numbers.)
Did you happen to notice the caliber of Nebraska? Geos talents are going to be greatly missed when playing better teams with more athletic talents; teams that put pressure on guards and in clutch timeI agree (after 1 game). Geo forces up too many 3s and the ball doesn’t flow as well. Guys were really moving w/o the ball and that provided great spacing.
Yes. In the game thread, RU#s commented on how long it would take for someone to start a "better without Geo" thread.I think he was joking.
Jacob and Montez are both very athletic. Our length also neutralizes a lot of speed advantages other teams might have.Are u guys f’n serious?!?
We are in big trouble when we face well coach teams with athletic guards.
NU is athletic but small. Geo is not a great ball handler or passer. It’s only 1 game but feel good about it.Did you happen to notice the caliber of Nebraska? Geos talents are going to be greatly missed when playing better teams with more athletic talents; teams that put pressure on guards and in clutch time
>> the "Curse on the Careers of Everyone Who Leaves 'NYPD Blue' "So instead of the Patrick Ewing theory we got the geo baker theory according to the OP. Someone email Bill Simmons.
https://www.espn.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/010509a