Breaking Down the B1G - One persons take

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,432
7,710
113
Very clearly, the teams discussed between 8-14 have all lost a ton and have not replaced them with top tier talent . He seemed to want to place us higher but Eugene’s loss tempered his pick. Frankly,I would be very surprised if we did not finish ahead of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa , Indiana , Nebraska, and Northwestern, considering how much each of those teams have lost, not just one year contributors but 2-4 year contributors. Maybe with the exception of Indiana , we are more talented than the rest of those teams on his bottom list.
That brings us to the top and Michigan State, Ohio State , Maryland, Purdue, Michigan, Illinois and Penn State. Not even Michigan State , that we have been very competitive with the last few years , is an automatic loss. The rest of the games against this tier , including Purdue and Michigan with their big losses, will be highly competitive and determine if we go dancing. Not one team scares me, unlike prior seasons, with our deep lineup going toe to toe. It is time to chop down these Big 10 traditional programs and I think the chemistry this Spain trip has provided , along with the experimenting by Coach with the lineups , will provide the experience needed to get over the hump . I predict top tier of the Big 10 as Coach will prove his worth.
 

blockm2

Senior
Jul 9, 2001
4,354
584
0
Very clearly, the teams discussed between 8-14 have all lost a ton and have not replaced them with top tier talent . He seemed to want to place us higher but Eugene’s loss tempered his pick. Frankly,I would be very surprised if we did not finish ahead of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa , Indiana , Nebraska, and Northwestern, considering how much each of those teams have lost, not just one year contributors but 2-4 year contributors. Maybe with the exception of Indiana , we are more talented than the rest of those teams on his bottom list.
That brings us to the top and Michigan State, Ohio State , Maryland, Purdue, Michigan, Illinois and Penn State. Not even Michigan State , that we have been very competitive with the last few years , is an automatic loss. The rest of the games against this tier , including Purdue and Michigan with their big losses, will be highly competitive and determine if we go dancing. Not one team scares me, unlike prior seasons, with our deep lineup going toe to toe. It is time to chop down these Big 10 traditional programs and I think the chemistry this Spain trip has provided , along with the experimenting by Coach with the lineups , will provide the experience needed to get over the hump . I predict top tier of the Big 10 as Coach will prove his worth.

I find it dangerous to make predictions in college hoops based on what teams have lost in terms of production. Far better to focus on what they return and add. If you just notice a great team lost contributors you might not realize how good the players backing them up were that couldn't get on the court and will now have a chance to shine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KevH and kcg88

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
I expect spots 6-13 or so to not be separated by very much. Going to come down to which teams have players improve more than expected and which teams have luck on their side in close games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RutgHoops

higgins3

All-Conference
Dec 15, 2012
7,319
2,434
113
Rutgers will finish either 7 or 8 with potential for 6.

Rutgers will have to get deeper into big ten tournament to get into March Madness. Injuries will have to be limited to minor ones, and not to key players.

Full disclosure- I don't follow the rest of the conference. I just feel this is Rutgers best team in some time.

Offense is picking up. Quotes have been made to show that defense has to pick up. If so, I believe middle of the pack is where Rutgers will finish up. I have full belief in the RAC, and it's ability to give Rutgers the 6th man.

A funny memory is from two years ago when I was standing next to a father of a Penn State player,Tony Carr. His son was shooting free throws, RAC erupted, and his dad leaned over to his daughter and said, " That's the loudest I have heard an arena this year."

The spaceship is ready for liftoff.
 
Last edited:

bowlgoal

Heisman
Jul 20, 2004
12,212
11,432
93
I feel like it’s a post season year.... finally but we just might be an NIT team. I think the assessment was pretty fair. We need to finish at .500 or better in the conference and win mostly every non conference game. I’m not sure Rutgers gets in to the NCAA as a bubble team. We are really going to have to earn it.
 

Mr_Twister

All-American
Apr 1, 2004
15,684
5,819
0
Our 3-point shooting and free throws woes diminish our chances for comebacks and winning close games. I like the optimism here, though. Without a clearly more talented roster, it’s hard to make huge improvement in the standings without doing all the little things right and staying healthy.
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Rutgers will finish either 7 or 8 with potential for 6.

Rutgers will have to get deeper into big ten tournament to get into March Madness. Injuries will have to be limited to minor ones, and not to key players.

So you have us ahead of these 5 for sure...
Northwestern
Nebraska
Minnesota
Indiana
Iowa

Other candidates....
Michigan
Wisconsin
Penn State
Illinois
Ohio State

I'd think it is VERY likely these are above us for sure....
Michigan State
Purdue
Maryland
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
My analysis gives you 4 tiers

TIER 1 (national champs thought)
MSU, Purdue and Maryland
TIER 2( potential really good teams)
Illinois OSU PSU Wisconsin and Michigan
TIER 3 (post season dreams)
Iowa Rutgers Indiana
Tier 4 (rebuilders)
Min NEB NW
 

higgins3

All-Conference
Dec 15, 2012
7,319
2,434
113
So you have us ahead of these 5 for sure...
Northwestern
Nebraska
Minnesota
Indiana
Iowa

Other candidates....
Michigan
Wisconsin
Penn State
Illinois
Ohio State

I'd think it is VERY likely these are above us for sure....
Michigan State
Purdue
Maryland

Yes. I think RU will finish above the first five, and then above Penn state. It will be close but I see them finishing 7-8 at end of year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

TDIrish27

All-Conference
Aug 2, 2001
4,438
2,666
0
I think Iowa will be pretty good again------Michigan and Minn drop big time

I think Indiana and RU will be neck and neck----ditto PSU
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
If Beilein was there I'd book a NCAA tournament bid. Still have Livers, Simpson and Teske.

They do have Mo wagner's brother coming in. Who know how good their freshman will be.
 

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
Anyone making definitive statements about the middle of the Big Ten can safely be ignored.There are a couple posters here who have a better sense of the conference than most national writers/outlets will have when they write their previews.
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Anyone making definitive statements about the middle of the Big Ten can safely be ignored.There are a couple posters here who have a better sense of the conference than most national writers/outlets will have when they write their previews.

1,000,000%

That should be said really 1 thru 14. Teams like.....
Nebraska- who knows how good all these transfers could be
Indiana- losing a ton, but still good pieces left...can the guy coach?
Illinois- oodles of talent, but...
Ohio State- looks good on paper but my confidence isn't sky high
Rutgers- No Omoruyi, Yeboah? Young? 4 sophs?
Purdue- No Edwards but decent guys left
Michigan- no Beilein but Teske Simpson and Livers back and frosh
Wisconsin - how much will team miss Happ, I think not as much as people thimk
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg and kcg88

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
1,000,000%

That should be said really 1 thru 14. Teams like.....
Nebraska- who knows how good all these transfers could be
Indiana- losing a ton, but still good pieces left...can the guy coach?
Illinois- oodles of talent, but...
Ohio State- looks good on paper but my confidence isn't sky high
Rutgers- No Omoruyi, Yeboah? Young? 4 sophs?
Purdue- No Edwards but decent guys left
Michigan- no Beilein but Teske Simpson and Livers back and frosh
Wisconsin - how much will team miss Happ, I think not as much as people thimk

It's a very wide "middle of the Big Ten" this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDead and Scangg

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,432
7,710
113
I find it dangerous to make predictions in college hoops based on what teams have lost in terms of production. Far better to focus on what they return and add. If you just notice a great team lost contributors you might not realize how good the players backing them up were that couldn't get on the court and will now have a chance to shine.
Wisconsin is not replacing Happ and Iverson easily, Purdue not replacing Edwards and Klein easily, Indiana not replacing Romero and Morgan easily, Minnesota not replacing Coffey, Murphy and Debrayer easily, Northwestern not replacing Law and Pardon easily, Nebraska not replacing their 3 seniors in Copeland , Palmer and Watson along with Roby easily ! These were multiple years super impact all league players. I really do not give a damn what is behind them , they are not being replaced without a significant drop off. We have better talent than when we first entered the Big 10 and now the guys have been through the wars in the conference. We can go toe to toe with any of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rubigtimenow

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,432
7,710
113
Anyone making definitive statements about the middle of the Big Ten can safely be ignored.There are a couple posters here who have a better sense of the conference than most national writers/outlets will have when they write their previews.
What this even mean?
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
I’ll use the same arguement that I used with Corey Sanders here.

Of the top 8 minutes getters Edwards has the lowest offense rating. Now I’d take 108 and his usage was off the charts.

Same with Happ at 102. Lowest among top 8 minute getters.
 

BigEastPhil

Heisman
Nov 25, 2007
19,176
13,380
66
Put me in the camp that the Big 10 is not too strong or deep this year and hence if we slightly over-acheive and mature, we can end up in the top half of the conference.

Squad with NCAA Title Potential: Mich State

Elite 8 Potential: Maryland

NCAA Dance Favorites: Purdue;Ohio State

Teams slightly better than us and probably make Dance:: Illinois; Iowa

Teams we're at /could be at par with: Wisconsin; Michigan; Indiana;

Squads we're better than: Penn State;Minnesota; Northwestern; Nebraska

I see us in the 7-10 range this year in conference possibly as high as 6.
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
On paper I think it is a leap to say we are better than PSU

I’ll give you the other 3. Penn State finished 7-3 over the last 10 and was easily playing like a Top 25 school and returns almost everyone
 
  • Like
Reactions: rubigtimenow

BigEastPhil

Heisman
Nov 25, 2007
19,176
13,380
66
On paper I think it is a leap to say we are better than PSU

I’ll give you the other 3. Penn State finished 7-3 over the last 10 and was easily playing like a Top 25 school and returns almost everyone
Fair enough.....but they have no home court advantage; lack of depth; no fan interest; an enigma on and off the court with Watkins and a questionable coach. We will be better than PSU.
 
Apr 8, 2002
15,534
26,785
113
I don't even know why some of you are Rutgers fans? Always undervaluing Rutgers while placing others on a pedestal. Some of you need to get off your knees and wipe away the creamy stuff around your lips because you're playing yourself. :chairshot:

Let the boys kick *** and take names this season. Enjoy the ride without overanalyzing things.
 

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
On paper I think it is a leap to say we are better than PSU

I’ll give you the other 3. Penn State finished 7-3 over the last 10 and was easily playing like a Top 25 school and returns almost everyone

"Almost everyone" except the conference's defensive player of the year as well as Rasir Bolton (second-highest usage on the team)
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDead

blockm2

Senior
Jul 9, 2001
4,354
584
0
Wisconsin is not replacing Happ and Iverson easily, Purdue not replacing Edwards and Klein easily, Indiana not replacing Romero and Morgan easily, Minnesota not replacing Coffey, Murphy and Debrayer easily, Northwestern not replacing Law and Pardon easily, Nebraska not replacing their 3 seniors in Copeland , Palmer and Watson along with Roby easily ! These were multiple years super impact all league players. I really do not give a damn what is behind them , they are not being replaced without a significant drop off. We have better talent than when we first entered the Big 10 and now the guys have been through the wars in the conference. We can go toe to toe with any of them.

Purdue and Wisconsin will both be pretty good this year. Purdue last year replaced 4 senior starters and still ended up pretty good. How did that happen? By your logic they should have been terrible last season.

Ethan Happ is a great college player, but Iverson was a role player that only played half the time anyway so no big loss. Wisconsin has plenty of talent to be a top 25 ish team this season.


Like I said, it's not about what you lose but about what you return and add. Worrying only about losses would mean you never understand why the same teams tend to be good season after season.
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Like I said, it's not about what you lose but about what you return and add. Worrying only about losses would mean you never understand why the same teams tend to be good season after season.

Sometimes you don't lose as much as you think you lose when certain players leave. I'll bet if there was a study done where high usage guys with much lower than the team average efficiency leave the offense actually improves.

Happ and Edwards could test that. Now I think no way is Purdue better offensively than last year. Wisconsin could be. Happ had the ball in his hands way too much!
 

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
Sometimes you don't lose as much as you think you lose when certain players leave. I'll bet if there was a study done where high usage guys with much lower than the team average efficiency leave the offense actually improves.

Happ and Edwards could test that. Now I think no way is Purdue better offensively than last year. Wisconsin could be. Happ had the ball in his hands way too much!

Not a study but a few examples from power-conference guys who had very high usage lately and an Individual ORtg less than the Team ORtg. All these guys had at least 30% usage.

Oklahoma with Trae Young (2018): 48th in KenPom / 37th in Offensive Efficiency
Oklahoma in 2019: 32nd / 57th

Young was a 112.1 ORtg and the team was 114.6, so not a big difference.

Oklahoma State with Juwan Evans (2017) : 22nd / 1st
Oklahoma State in 2018: 59th / 61st

Worth noting there was a coaching change for OKie State and a lot of turnover, so maybe not a great data point.

Seton Hall with Isaiah Whitehead (2016): 29th / 72nd
Seton Hall in 2017: 51st / 84th

Cal with Jaylen Brown (2016): 28th / 53rd
Cal in 2017: 62nd/160th

Nebraska with Terran Petteway (2015): 121nd / 264th
Nebraska in 2016: 85th / 86th

Nebraska got transfer Andrew White eligible for 2016 which was IMO the biggest reason for the improvement.

Oklahoma State with Le'Bryan Nash (2015): 38th / 51st
Oklahoma State in 2016: 98th / 151st

So I'd say there's probably not much correlation but if anything it's a negative correlation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greene Rice FIG

RUsojo

Heisman
Dec 17, 2010
29,435
28,578
113
It’s a great time to be a middling or rebuilding team in the big ten. The conference is getting weaker every year by and large as the ACC begins to flatten everyone and the SEC continues to amoeba really big strides. We need to take advantage.
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
It’s a great time to be a middling or rebuilding team in the big ten. The conference is getting weaker every year by and large as the ACC begins to flatten everyone and the SEC continues to amoeba really big strides. We need to take advantage.

B10 finished ahead of ACC last year looking at most metrics. Not even that far behind the year before when the B1G was "down".

Take with a HUGE GRAIN OF SALT.....
preseason Barts has B1G 14 teams
2, 7,8,15,17,19, 25
30, 51, 56, 57, 80, 96, 108

ACC
4, 5,11,21,32, 36, 44
58, 69, 70, 82, 85, 93, 127, 162
 

blockm2

Senior
Jul 9, 2001
4,354
584
0
Yes, Michigan will have talent, but it's a huge dropoff from John Beilein to Juwan Howard.

Potentially yes. Michigan unlikely to be a top 10 team all season like last year but could still well be a top 20 team.
 

BigEastPhil

Heisman
Nov 25, 2007
19,176
13,380
66
Howard will be a different type of recruiter for Michigan. He ll get highly rated kids and im sure he ll recruit inner city Detroit which I think izzo now controls.
 

blockm2

Senior
Jul 9, 2001
4,354
584
0
Howard will be a different type of recruiter for Michigan. He ll get highly rated kids and im sure he ll recruit inner city Detroit which I think izzo now controls.

the only 3 top 100 (per 247 composite) recruits from Detroit since 2011 were Derrick Walton (Michigan), Cassius Winston (MSU), and Josh Jackson (Kansas), though Jackson played his senior season at a prep school (aka basketball factory) in California.

Both Michigan and MSU have a total of 1 scholarship player from Detroit on their rosters this season.