Sit or Carter

Which QB do you want to start vs MASS?


  • Total voters
    0

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,095
12,888
113
Wasn’t the main argument “2018 was the worst offense in college football and the worst of the Ash Era, but we need McN back for continuity”?

If “continuity” is the reason McN needed to come back, doesn’t Sit have to start?

For “continuity”??
 

greenknight

Heisman
Sep 1, 2001
20,722
12,501
113
Offense will be much better this year I have alot of faith in McNulty. I think he is the main reason for change in OL coach. I think this staff needs 2 more yrs I think the coaches in place are light yrs ahead of where we started 3 yrs ago
 
  • Like
Reactions: shields

WhiteBus

Heisman
Oct 4, 2011
39,516
21,918
113
Carter. It would be nearly impossible for him to be worse than Sit.

When Sitkowski was finally benched for the last game, stat wise Gio wasn't that big of an improvement. But you know what? Got some important first with his legs. Had the lead in the 4th quarter with a chance to win.
Tired of walking out of the stadium or turning off the TV before halftime because we are getting our *** handed to us.
 

KnightsofChrome

All-Conference
Sep 20, 2012
3,829
1,076
0
Wasn’t the main argument “2018 was the worst offense in college football and the worst of the Ash Era, but we need McN back for continuity”?

If “continuity” is the reason McN needed to come back, doesn’t Sit have to start?

For “continuity”??
One sits and hopes things happen, the other plays, and makes things happen.
 

ru66

All-American
Jul 28, 2001
12,175
6,257
0
silly poll--as if the pseudo experts on this board have any meaningful insight--especially after one scrimmage--if you vote, you're outed yourself
 
May 11, 2010
72,487
56,951
0
silly poll--as if the pseudo experts on this board have any meaningful insight--especially after one scrimmage--if you vote, you're outed yourself

Most of us have either played ball or been watching it for many years.
Some here even coach right now.

We all saw enough of Check Down Sit last season.
He's not ready to be the starting QB, maybe he will never be
 
Dec 17, 2008
45,214
16,774
0
Wasn’t the main argument “2018 was the worst offense in college football and the worst of the Ash Era, but we need McN back for continuity”?

If “continuity” is the reason McN needed to come back, doesn’t Sit have to start?

For “continuity”??
Carter is going to be our Baker Mayfield duh lol. :Wink:

I didn't vote in the poll but I'll say this...I like that he was a KK qb recruit. There's a reason I was always coming up with those KK hypotheticals to be a possible candidate just before he got fired. The man knows qbs and can identify qbs with potential so I'll assume Carter has solid potential...just how much of it is realized and fulfilled here who the hell knows. I've barely seen the guy play so who the heck knows...it's just the KK "endorsement" that would make me think there must be some potential.

As to continuity, I've said before here too many take it as black and white and that it must be the embodiment of a single person. I don't see it that way.

IMO continuity is having an overarching theme and philosophy that's constant but can have tweaks here and there and doesn't necessarily have to be embodied in a singular entity. McNulty as the same OC but sounds like we're not going to be running the same offense as last year. Is that continuity even though the same OC is back?

I've mentioned this here before when people talk about our number of OCs over the years. Utah IIRC has had 9 OCs in 11 years and they've been humming along pretty okay to well for the most part. Whittingham is a defensive coach too but I'm guessing the overarching theme has been similar through those changes with personal variations. Same for Bob Stoops at OU who I've mentioned here as well....also a defensive coach. Influenced by his time under Spurrier and Florida he wanted a wide open capable of scoring offense. First year hired Mike Leach and he was there only for a year that's all. No continuity right? Nope that theme and what Leach laid the foundation for remained through I think maybe 6-7 coordinators during Stoops' tenure, some from within and it was humming pretty well on offense for the part.

That's my point it's the overarching theme and philosophy that needs continuity not particularly we need to have things embodied in a singular entity year to year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wolv RU

OldManRiver1

All-Conference
Apr 3, 2002
3,292
1,418
113
Carter. It would be nearly impossible for him to be worse than Sit.

When Sitkowski was finally benched for the last game, stat wise Gio wasn't that big of an improvement. But you know what? Got some important first with his legs. Had the lead in the 4th quarter with a chance to win.
Tired of walking out of the stadium or turning off the TV before halftime because we are getting our *** handed to us.

I would have loved to see what would have happened if he made this "Philly Special" catch...pivotal point in game


 

RUwoz

All-Conference
Jul 20, 2014
3,266
1,982
0
Lol nobody here actually knows anything about Carter. Same group that voted for Bolig years ago... “he’s super good but only didn’t start because he was behind a heisman trophy winner”
 

RUChoppin

Heisman
Dec 1, 2006
19,270
13,695
0
I have zero input on this and have to abstain. I know Sit struggled last year, but I have nothing to go on with Carter. Hoping a second year with McNulty can magically get things to start to "gel" for the team as a whole - having a returning OC is uncharted waters at this point, since we haven't had one in over a decade.
 

beaced_rivals

Heisman
Jul 18, 2004
32,005
10,324
0
Offense will be much better this year I have alot of faith in McNulty. I think he is the main reason for change in OL coach. I think this staff needs 2 more yrs I think the coaches in place are light yrs ahead of where we started 3 yrs ago
Actually ,4 more years should get it done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rurichdog

sherepower

Heisman
Apr 2, 2008
22,760
20,885
113
Amazing you have Syracuse and Iowa st in the top 20......,why?

Both head coaches are offensive minded. Which makes their QB play so much better than a defensive minded coach like ASH. If you give these two QB’s here at Rutgers a chance to be coached under BABERS OR CAMPBELL. They would be very good college QB’s in my opinion
 

RUReady76

Freshman
Sep 7, 2009
177
95
0
Wasn’t the main argument “2018 was the worst offense in college football and the worst of the Ash Era, but we need McN back for continuity”?

If “continuity” is the reason McN needed to come back, doesn’t Sit have to start?

For “continuity”??[/QUOTE
He must. AS started last year in order to groom a quarterback for the long term. It doesn't mean Carter cannot play meaningful minutes.
Wasn’t the main argument “2018 was the worst offense in college football and the worst of the Ash Era, but we need McN back for continuity”?

If “continuity” is the reason McN needed to come back, doesn’t Sit have to start?

For “continuity”??
 

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,095
12,888
113
Amazing you have Syracuse and Iowa st in the top 20......,why?

Both head coaches are offensive minded. Which makes their QB play so much better than a defensive minded coach like ASH. If you give these two QB’s here at Rutgers a chance to be coached under BABERS OR CAMPBELL. They would be very good college QB’s in my opinion

You must be reading the polls wrong.
I have it on good authority (from many on this board) that Babers and his “up tempo, fast pace, gimmick offense” will never work in a P5 conference. It certainly would never work against elite teams (such as Clemson.....).

Of course these are usually the people making these two contradictory statements:
1. Recruiting is all that matters. Nobody could coach these RU players and win or be competitive.
2. Syracuse is in our rear view. They have no talent. They will never win.

Maybe coaching does come first....
 

RUReady76

Freshman
Sep 7, 2009
177
95
0
Wasn’t the main argument “2018 was the worst offense in college football and the worst of the Ash Era, but we need McN back for continuity”?

If “continuity” is the reason McN needed to come back, doesn’t Sit have to start?

For “continuity”??
He should, if the stated goal is to develop a long term quarterback. Carter should contribute and play meaningful minutes. Why would we start over again next year looking for a QB?
 

RU848789

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
65,217
44,292
113
Carter. It would be nearly impossible for him to be worse than Sit.

When Sitkowski was finally benched for the last game, stat wise Gio wasn't that big of an improvement. But you know what? Got some important first with his legs. Had the lead in the 4th quarter with a chance to win.
Tired of walking out of the stadium or turning off the TV before halftime because we are getting our *** handed to us.

Exactly. As I said when Carter first transferred here, it was clear from his film that he's a much better QB with much better mobility and ability to throw on the run than AS. No brainer to bench the worst QB in 1A last year (and in many years) for a guy who was ready to be the starter at Texas Tech, if not for injury (as long as he's healthy now and he appears to be after yesterday).
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
88,736
86,734
113
You must be reading the polls wrong.
I have it on good authority (from many on this board) that Babers and his “up tempo, fast pace, gimmick offense” will never work in a P5 conference. It certainly would never work against elite teams (such as Clemson.....).

Of course these are usually the people making these two contradictory statements:
1. Recruiting is all that matters. Nobody could coach these RU players and win or be competitive.
2. Syracuse is in our rear view. They have no talent. They will never win.

Maybe coaching does come first....
Many on this board? A couple to a few at most.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NickRU714

FourSpot

Freshman
Jun 12, 2003
134
60
0
Carter is unknown to me. He may be a D1 QB. The other has not demonstrated that he belongs at this level.