Congrats to FDU

Doctor Worm

Heisman
Feb 7, 2002
30,376
22,313
113
Not to be that guy, but they were in the dance once they won their conference tournament. The term "play in game" is a misnomer. It's a 68 team field. If you're one of the 68, you get to hang the banner even if you lose on Tuesday or Wednesday.

That said, CONGRATULATIONS indeed!
 

Salvi's Headband

All-American
Oct 30, 2006
5,569
9,436
0
Not to be that guy, but they were in the dance once they won their conference tournament. The term "play in game" is a misnomer. It's a 68 team field. If you're one of the 68, you get to hang the banner even if you lose on Tuesday or Wednesday.

That said, CONGRATULATIONS indeed!

I honestly have never felt that way. I suppose you're technically correct but to me you're only in the tournament once you in the field of 64
 

Salvi's Headband

All-American
Oct 30, 2006
5,569
9,436
0
Not to be that guy, but they were in the dance once they won their conference tournament. The term "play in game" is a misnomer. It's a 68 team field. If you're one of the 68, you get to hang the banner even if you lose on Tuesday or Wednesday.

That said, CONGRATULATIONS indeed!

I feel the same way about baseball: the wild-card game isnt theplayoffs but again I accept the fact that that's not technically accurate.
 

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,009
0
Not to be that guy, but they were in the dance once they won their conference tournament. The term "play in game" is a misnomer. It's a 68 team field. If you're one of the 68, you get to hang the banner even if you lose on Tuesday or Wednesday.

That said, CONGRATULATIONS indeed!

You’re right . I actually feel the play in games should be the last 8 at large teams . Automaric qualifiers shouldn’t have to play their way into the first round. .
If rutgers ever gets in the tournament we will probably have to play Tuesday night knowing our luck.
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,374
4,657
66
Plum...Why should it be the last at-large bids ? These teams are playing to get into the 64, so it should be the last 8 of all 68. There are some auto-qualifiers who fit here.

What I fail to understand is why 2 eleven seeds should need to play an extra game to reach the final 64 while all the lower seeds do not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletDave

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,009
0
Plum...Why should it be the last at-large bids ? These teams are playing to get into the 64, so it should be the last 8 of all 68. There are some auto-qualifiers who fit here.

What I fail to understand is why 2 eleven seeds should need to play an extra game to reach the final 64 while all the lower seeds do not.

Because they expanded the field to allow those extra 4 at large in. That’s why they are in those games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUChoppin

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,374
4,657
66
yes, but does that sound fair ? making these better teams play an extra game instead of a play-in approach of the weakest 8 having to play in ?
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,703
177,411
113
the autobid winners should all not be playing in the play in games...why is FDU any different than the other 2 16 seeds who dont have to play a play in game, just because their SOS was a little lower. The little guys shouldnt be punished with a play in game, they qualified

the least quality at large schools should be playing each other and it would draw better ratings if it were the last 8 at larges
 

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
the autobid winners should all not be playing in the play in games...why is FDU any different than the other 2 16 seeds who dont have to play a play in game, just because their SOS was a little lower. The little guys shouldnt be punished with a play in game, they qualified

the least quality at large schools should be playing each other and it would draw better ratings if it were the last 8 at larges

Been saying this for years. I'm also 100% certain that Ohio State vs. Oklahoma would draw far better ratings than Fairleigh Dickinson vs. Prairie View.

But it's not a mystery why they do it the way that they do.
 

ScarletDave

Heisman
Oct 7, 2010
34,597
15,352
85
They do it exactly how they WANT to do it. It’s an invitational tournament after all. That said. It should absolutely be the last 4 At-large teams in the tournament and the winners will be 16 seeds. Sorry St. John’s, you weren’t even gonna be in the tournament 5 minutes ago, now you’re an 11 seed and get and easier ride than other teams who won their way in? You don’t like it then decline invite and go be a top seed in the NIT. That’s how it SHOULD be done
 

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,009
0
Although I don’t think the 16 seeds should play the FDU game was fun to watch . It was nice rooting for another jersey school for a change
 
  • Like
Reactions: cicero grimes

koolraddad

Senior
Mar 13, 2010
743
643
93
I absolutely agree, if you win your conference, you get the autobid, therefore, you should not have to play in the "play in" games. I agree, the last 8 bubble teams should, no matte who they are.

That said, FDU was fun to watch. Prairie View was hitting 3's like crazy.

I seem to remember, in the last few years,the play in games were being referred to Round 1, then Thursday and Friday were Round 2. This year, there was no reference. Am I mistaken in my memory, that is generally fading fast anyway.
 

PiscatawayMike

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
17,345
15,214
113
I seem to remember, in the last few years,the play in games were being referred to Round 1, then Thursday and Friday were Round 2. This year, there was no reference. Am I mistaken in my memory, that is generally fading fast anyway.
They used to call the Dayton games the opening round and then the games on Thursday and Friday the first round. Very confusing. Much better now, referring to the Dayton games simply as the First Four.
 

biazza38

Heisman
Nov 18, 2012
14,432
17,487
81
I actually like the idea that some 16 seeds get to play Tuesday and Wednesday. Think of it this way, FDU got their first ever tournament win in school history yesterday. That’s doesn’t happen if they open against a one
 
  • Like
Reactions: knight82

Loyal_2RU

Heisman
Aug 6, 2001
15,233
11,049
113
I actually like the idea that some 16 seeds get to play Tuesday and Wednesday. Think of it this way, FDU got their first ever tournament win in school history yesterday. That’s doesn’t happen if they open against a one
That is an excellent argument that provides the flip side to bac's also excellent vision
 
  • Like
Reactions: biazza38

OntheBanks

All-Conference
Jul 26, 2001
13,197
4,550
113
So you want to take all the fun out of the tournament and the conference tournaments?
No, I want the 96 top rated teams playing in the tournaments. There still will be plenty of fun.
Would you rather see one of the top seeds play North Dakota St. (200) or Colorado(64) in the first round?
If you don't like kenpom maybe a combined kenpom/net composite rating could be used.
 

dpwhite

All-American
Jan 21, 2003
2,952
7,127
103
No, I want the 96 top rated teams playing in the tournaments. There still will be plenty of fun.
Would you rather see one of the top seeds play North Dakota St. (200) or Colorado(64) in the first round?
If you don't like kenpom maybe a combined kenpom/net composite rating could be used.

I love the possibility of the mid majors upsetting the big boys. I love the conference tournament weeks. It's so unique. It's great.
 
  • Like
Reactions: knight82

Scarlet Shack

Heisman
Feb 3, 2004
26,277
15,953
73
You’re right . I actually feel the play in games should be the last 8 at large teams . Automaric qualifiers shouldn’t have to play their way into the first round. .
If rutgers ever gets in the tournament we will probably have to play Tuesday night knowing our luck.

We will have to play on Tuesday and Wednesday ...book it
 

Captain Hogleg

All-Conference
Jan 26, 2006
3,133
4,229
68
No, I want the 96 top rated teams playing in the tournaments. There still will be plenty of fun.
Would you rather see one of the top seeds play North Dakota St. (200) or Colorado(64) in the first round?
If you don't like kenpom maybe a combined kenpom/net composite rating could be used.

In answer to your question - the former over the latter. NDSU is interesting as conf winner CU; not so much as a 64. Love the mid majors- why in hell would you mess with the format? This tournament is so interesting because we get to see the passion these smaller programs bring to the early rounds.
 

LeapinLou

All-American
Jul 24, 2001
13,171
6,859
113
I agree with Bac that the play in games should be for the last 8 at large teams. However, the counterargument is that this win has done wonders for FDU from a publicity perspective. Getting this win BEFORE getting drubbed by a #1 seed seems to work out well for these lower mid-majors.
 

OntheBanks

All-Conference
Jul 26, 2001
13,197
4,550
113
I love the possibility of the mid majors upsetting the big boys. I love the conference tournament weeks. It's so unique. It's great.
I consider the Majors as ACC, B1G, B12, SEC, P12, BE and AAC in basketball.
There are 15 other teams in Kenpom in his Top 64 that you may consider Mid-Major or Low-Major.
They are Gonzaga, Wofford, Buffalo, Nevada, St. Mary's, Utah St, VCU, Lipscomb, Belmont, Murray St., New Mexico St., Furman, Toledo, Liberty & Utah St.