Big Ten Tourney Bracket is Set

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,699
177,402
113
 
  • Like
Reactions: goru7

superfan01

All-American
May 29, 2003
8,780
8,003
0
Earlier today it looked like we would have Northwestern->Iowa->Purdue. I was pretty excited. Now it’s at best 1-and-done, and that’s a big maybe.


Agree. Nebraska will be a battle and just don’t like how we match up vs Maryland especially going back to back nights.

No one to blame but ourselves. Needed to win one of the last 2.

Also sucks the Nebraska game on Wednesday is early in day
 

RU_fan435

Sophomore
Dec 6, 2017
98
103
0
I was hoping to get 11th seed. Best path IMO with northwestern being the weakest team and Iowa being on the decline, and we held with Michigan decently
 

S_Janowski

Heisman
May 24, 2009
13,915
26,524
113
Sucks to see us sitting at 12 with Illinois and PSU ahead of us...Let’s win 2 games this week and end the season on a high note.
 

YoucancallmeRay

All-Conference
Nov 3, 2015
1,790
1,905
113
Come on, are you kidding! Of course we can have a run. Why can't we beat Nebraska and Maryland to start? You think they're invincible? If we play great D and hit the boards and play aggressive, we can beat both of them. Jesus, what a bunch of Debbie Downers.
 

RUPete

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
26,841
16,113
0
Come on, are you kidding! Of course we can have a run. Why can't we beat Nebraska and Maryland to start? You think they're invincible? If we play great D and hit the boards and play aggressive, we can beat both of them. Jesus, what a bunch of Debbie Downers.
Yup! Let’s go! New season.
 

satnom

All-American
Jun 28, 2002
6,979
8,583
88
What I think really sucks is if RU beats Neb we play a fresh MD team next day less than 24 hrs later. EO is going to have to oil up that knee next day.

GO RU
 
May 11, 2010
72,487
56,950
0
Why is Illinois a higher seed?

Today was a given loss but not showing up in the first half of Senior Night vs Pen St really hurt this season
 

Local Shill

All-American
Aug 30, 2001
21,518
7,327
113
What I think really sucks is if RU beats Neb we play a fresh MD team next day less than 24 hrs later. EO is going to have to oil up that knee next day.

GO RU
Yeah that’s going to be rough. Past two years the second round game was the last game of the night. Now it’s going to be at 2 pm Chicago time after finishing around 8 the night before.
 

RedChucken123

Senior
Oct 21, 2015
487
565
88
Clearly, it’ll be tough for us because we are constantly playing back to back games versus middle of the pack teams, but if this was a regularly spaced set of games, it’s not THAT bad if the end goal is to get far. We played Wisconsin close early in the season and Indiana could possibly beat Michigan State a third time. If the goal is to get the easiest games early, then yes, Illinois has a good draw, but having to go through Michigan and Purdue? Oof.
 

RutgHoops

Heisman
Aug 14, 2008
9,239
12,411
102
What’s frustrating is that despite all the improvement we still finished 3rd to last. Have a terrible draw. We have such a long way to go to be a tourney team. Ughh

Ohio State and (possibly) Indiana are going to make the tournament. Do you really feel we have "a long way to go" to finish where they did?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ole Cabbagehead

wheezer

Heisman
Jun 3, 2001
169,849
25,534
113
Can someone verify our start time Wednesday? The newspaper had it at 5:30. Op has it 6:30
 
Jul 10, 2017
292
324
63
I think we can hang with Nebraska. We played Michigan and Penn State closer than Maryland did and beat Iowa(should have beat them twice) while Maryland lost to Iowa. Wisconsin will be hard to beat.
 

AreYouNUTS

Heisman
Aug 1, 2001
123,339
57,370
113
Nebraska, Maryland, Wisconsin? I’ll take that over having to play Purdue, Michigan, or Michigan State in the third round. I’m not sure what some of you guys are talking about. Play like we had been playing up until Sunday and we beat Nebraska and can beat Maryland.
 

dconifer0

All-Conference
Oct 4, 2004
4,341
3,353
113
Agree. Nebraska will be a battle and just don’t like how we match up vs Maryland especially going back to back nights.

No one to blame but ourselves. Needed to win one of the last 2.

Also sucks the Nebraska game on Wednesday is early in day

Just for the record, us Terrapin fans are a bit disappointed in how we ended up as well. It's all relative, right?
 

RUfinal4

All-Conference
Apr 24, 2006
15,759
1,931
0
Yeah that’s going to be rough. Past two years the second round game was the last game of the night. Now it’s going to be at 2 pm Chicago time after finishing around 8 the night before.

That is poor scheduling by the B10
The 10 v 7 game should be the 2nd game of the night with the winner of the 12 v 13 playing the 6pm game
 
  • Like
Reactions: riverrat151

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,699
177,402
113
the 5/12 game HAS to be slotted in that spot because that half of the draw are afternoon games. the following day the 4 vs 5-12/13 winner will be at 3 as well. Thats how the tourney works, you dont switch up sides of the bracket, you keep them in blocks..either at night or in the day. It is what it is
 

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,428
7,700
113
Nebraska, Maryland, Wisconsin? I’ll take that over having to play Purdue, Michigan, or Michigan State in the third round. I’m not sure what some of you guys are talking about. Play like we had been playing up until Sunday and we beat Nebraska and can beat Maryland.
Aside from the quick turnaround if we get by Nebraska on Wednesday, playing Maryland at 3pm after finishing 830pm the night before, I do not think we could have asked for a better draw, although it could be argued Northwestern , Iowa and Michigan is equally good but I think Michigan is better than Maryland and Wisconsin. Coach Pike has won at least one game in the tourney even in Year 1 so expect him to flush the film of yesterday’s no show and come out intense. Even his post game comments were we played little defense and without intensity. Hoping to get by Nebraska , which I think we should settling up an intriguing game with Maryland and 2 young teams going head to head.
 
Last edited:

NewJerseyHawk

Heisman
Jan 11, 2007
24,450
38,741
113
We won’t beat anybody unless good Geo shows up. The one that is confident and successfully takes on scoring duties and defends like his hair is on fire.

Obviously, someone hasn't been really watching the breakdown of the games....Caleb has been bringing the ball up the ball and starting the offense much more recently and RU is in most games, despite Geo's up and down season (outside of yesterday, which was more lack of defense than Geo not scoring enough). I don't know how certain things get spun into a narrative, but this roster is good enough to win a game without a major contribution from Baker......and it's won games without a game of note from Montez Mathis as well.....

The question is not about Baker any longer, fans aren't watching what's happening.....,the real step is when do we starting to hold the 4 freshmen to a higher standard of ownership, play, performance and being ready to play from the opening tipoff, that we hold Geo and Eugene to that same standard. The Geo thing is a 2 or 3 month ago, situation, where if he missed shots back in November, we didn't believe anyone else was ready to take those shots or make those plays.

Geo had 9 points on 9 shots and we handled Iowa on the road easily.....

Geo didn't dominate things on the road at Northwestern and we won that game....he had 12 points and took 11 shots....

Geo only took 7 shots vs Minnesota and had 5 of 6 FT's to help seal things at the end, but not the key shooter or scorer at this stage of the season.

The 0-10 vs PSU should be a signal to fans that RU was in a game where Baker and Mathis gave no production of points....if this was a "Geo must play well to win", then the PSU game should have been a 10 to 15 point win for PSU....

Time to adjust things and refocus regarding Geo and Eugene as well....we are winning games and its far from the Geo and Eugene 2 man-band of 2 to 3 months ago.....we have other options to go to now and a "Geo must play well situation", doesn't get RU from 3 B1G wins to 7 B1G wins. It happens because the entire roster evolves and is better.....and that should be encouraging, not a stale narrative that doesn't apply anymore.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU-ROCS