WHY WAS THAT NOT CHECKED??!!

ScarletDave

Heisman
Oct 7, 2010
34,597
15,352
85
The refs have used the replay about 10 times this game, to try to screw us (3 shot clock violations, only 1 which actually was, where Johnson was fouled before it anyway), tried to take away Ron’s 3, tried to call a flagrant on us .. but the ONE that would change in our favor, nope not reviewable. Of course
 
  • Like
Reactions: rume

RU MAN

Heisman
Oct 29, 2001
23,622
10,214
113
TERRIBLE CALL. THE BALL WAS OFF THE RIM AND THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN REVIEWED (IT'S NOT BUT SHOULD BE) AND IT SHOULD HAVE COUNTED. (I am in all caps because I'm _uckin' pissed off!!!!!
 

Shafthawk

Redshirt
Mar 1, 2003
10,766
14
0
The intentional elbow should have been called on you guys, but guessing you guys are ok with overlooking that one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hagarwood

Shafthawk

Redshirt
Mar 1, 2003
10,766
14
0
TERRIBLE CALL. THE BALL WAS OFF THE RIM AND THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN REVIEWED (IT'S NOT BUT SHOULD BE) AND IT SHOULD HAVE COUNTED. (I am in all caps because I'm _uckin' pissed off!!!!!


You mad bro? Now what?
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
TERRIBLE CALL. THE BALL WAS OFF THE RIM AND THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN REVIEWED (IT'S NOT BUT SHOULD BE) AND IT SHOULD HAVE COUNTED. (I am in all caps because I'm _uckin' pissed off!!!!!
And the ref calling it did not have the angle to see where it was on the rim. He was directly behind the tip in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU MAN

RU MAN

Heisman
Oct 29, 2001
23,622
10,214
113
And the ref calling it did not have the angle to see where it was on the rim. He was directly behind the tip in.
They need to add that kind of call to review. It's ridiculous for an official who is out of position to call that.
 

BOCA93

All-Conference
Jan 16, 2012
2,951
3,710
61
What makes that call not reviewable but literally every other thing that happens on the court is?!?
 

RU MAN

Heisman
Oct 29, 2001
23,622
10,214
113
What makes that call not reviewable but literally every other thing that happens on the court is?!?
Who knows. It was an awful call. The guy wasn't even in position to call it. But he was also the POS that called an intentional-unintential foul on Bohannon when Montez had a breakaway layup, and then he missed both FT's. Total ********.
 

fischy5000

Senior
Dec 11, 2008
2,666
932
0
They need to add that kind of call to review. It's ridiculous for an official who is out of position to call that.
It might not be officially reviewable but that doesn't stop the other ref(s) who were in better position to stop play regroup with the fellow refs and discuss whether they should keep/overrule decision. Other ref should step up and say no I had the better angle and it wasn't GT.
Also I didn't get to see most of the game---approx when did this happen so I can go watch replay?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU MAN

RU MAN

Heisman
Oct 29, 2001
23,622
10,214
113
It might not be officially reviewable but that doesn't stop the other ref(s) who were in better position to stop play regroup with the fellow refs and discuss whether they should keep/overrule decision. Other ref should step up and say no I had the better angle and it wasn't GT.
Also I didn't get to see most of the game---approx when did this happen so I can go watch replay?
I think IIRC it happened with around 6 to 7 minutes remaining. But I may be mistaken.
 

RU MAN

Heisman
Oct 29, 2001
23,622
10,214
113
Thanks. I don't have it in me to watch full game replay knowing the outcome
You're welcome. It's way too difficult to watch this game again. All I will say is the replay shows the ball was off the cylinder and we should have been award the basket. Of course it didn't help when Montez missed 3 out of 4 FT's at the end. Still, Iowa's win was one of the luckiest wins I've seen in 50 years. Still hurts like hell.