Rutgers mentioned in “on life support” category
https://www.usatoday.com/story/spor...t-bracketology-college-basketball/2719167002/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/spor...t-bracketology-college-basketball/2719167002/
I seriously doubt a team struggling to have a winning season would be selected for the NCAA Tournament.There simply are too many teams that will have better records.Look what happened to Nebraska last season winning 20 games and received no bid.Rutgers mentioned in “on life support” category
https://www.usatoday.com/story/spor...t-bracketology-college-basketball/2719167002/
We beat Michigan we are right back in the mix.
That's a drastic improvement from recent years, when we would have been in the "dead and buried" category in early February.Rutgers mentioned in “on life support” category
I think the Hall needs to be at least .500 in conference, no?I hope the hall has lost enough lately. Those impressive wins had them a near shoe in, but their overall record now makes an NIT not a sure thing
I find it ridiculous that they even have bracketology so early..and its been going on since January 1. Unfortunately it looks like this year is an extremely weak year for the bubble, the expansion to 68 plays a role but the lack of deserving schools this year is really off the charts
I think the Hall needs to be at least .500 in conference, no?
I hope the hall has lost enough lately. Those impressive wins had them a near shoe in, but their overall record now makes an NIT not a sure thing
I think the main reason that the bubble is very weak is because all the P5 teams have been plucking off the best players from the mid-majors for the last couple of years and it will probably only get worse as time goes on.
Best of Luck,
Groz
And because the top mid-major level teams got "called up" to better conferences.
Louisville, Marquette, and Memphis used to be in CUSA. Temple and Xavier used to be in the A10. Utah was in the MWC. Butler was in the Horizon. Wichita State and Creighton were in the MVC.
So it's not a giant surprise that those leagues are getting many fewer bids than they used to.
I hope the hall has lost enough lately. Those impressive wins had them a near shoe in, but their overall record now makes an NIT not a sure thing
I find it ridiculous that they even have bracketology so early..and its been going on since January 1. Unfortunately it looks like this year is an extremely weak year for the bubble, the expansion to 68 plays a role but the lack of deserving schools this year is really off the charts
I find it ridiculous that they even have bracketology so early..and its been going on since January 1. Unfortunately it looks like this year is an extremely weak year for the bubble, the expansion to 68 plays a role but the lack of deserving schools this year is really off the charts
Last year didn't a 20 win B1G school not make it? Not a strong bubble year?I feel like this is the perception every year about the bubble. Hard to remember a year where the consensus was that the bubble was strong.
----Kentucky and Maryland...ooc wins are huge
disagree...it is fun
Last year didn't a 20 win B1G school not make it? Not a strong bubble year?
Not to me.. and since they went to 68..there is less drama
I also am not a fan of NET and not sure if they are using it exclusively or just lip service
Last year didn't a 20 win B1G school not make it? Not a strong bubble year?
I seriously doubt a team struggling to have a winning season would be selected for the NCAA Tournament.There simply are too many teams that will have better records.Look what happened to Nebraska last season winning 20 games and received no bid.