Bill Parcells was once asked how he evaluates quarterbacks. What factors made a player a good quarterback?. Pocket presence, speed, quickness, vision, arm strength, accuracy, leadership, etc.? Passing yards, running yards, number of TDs, INTs, passing efficiency?
And all the other various statistics that QBs accumulate? What makes a good quarterback?
Parcells thought about it for a moment , and then said that none of these matter to him if the QB cannot win. Good QBs know how to win. Period.
Winning is the most important thing that matters in evaluating QBs and coaches. If a coach is a good coach, then he can coach his team to win games that are winnable. No excuses, no rationalizations, no moral victories, no participation trophies. If you cannot win a winnable game, then you are not a good coach in spite of whatever other wonderful skills you are teaching your players.
The Northwestern game was winnable as were the Fordham and Seton Hall games. But Pikiell could not get it done. When he starts to win more than one or two games in the B10 season, then he can be considered to be becoming a "good" coach. When he can keep Rutgers out of the B10 cellar year after year, then he can be considered to be becoming a "good" coach. When he starts winning winnable games, then he can considered a "good"coach. None of this has happened yet.