for making Mars habitable for future colonization:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...uickly-hospitable-drop-thermonuclear-weapons/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...uickly-hospitable-drop-thermonuclear-weapons/
Different style of genesis project I guess. Not sure how the location matters. Yes, it will vaporize the trapped water, but how much would actually remain in the atmosphere? Still need more gas to heat it up...
I get that part, I mentioned the water that would be there...but, how much would actually remain? Would the atmosphere be think enough to keep it in? How much do nukes actually add to the greenhouse gases? What long-term effect would that extra radiation have? Etc. All interesting to discuss no doubt and I hope man steps foot on the big red neighbor in my lifetime.My guess is that, like earth, the poles would be the coldest part of the planet and most likely to have a large amount of frozen water. What about the radiation though? I guess there would just be parts of the planet that humans would have to steer clear of for multiple years.
On3
Big 12 rival views Drew Mestemaker as best QB in the conference
OState Illustrated
Personnel Deep-Dive with Eric Morris: Cornerbacks
OState Illustrated
OState Illustrated Fall Camp deal: Your first year for just $30
OState Illustrated
In Action: Pads go on in Stillwater
Rivals
Texas is stacked with future Big 12, SEC and ACC stars, top-tier quarterback talent from 2027 class down