NU/Wisconsin 2nd Half Thread

freewillie07

Sophomore
Aug 22, 2017
5,240
100
48
I love that decision to go for 2. Even though it didn’t work. That playcall usually works. Brilliant.
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
47,090
3,436
78
People with any intelligence whatsoever recognize that you're deflecting with a transparent gambit like the good old, "You're a troll!" piffle. That's a slur, not an argument.

I can't name a single fanbase in major college athletics with lower expectations than this one. It's remarkable. And the rationalizations. It's like this pretend world where ND and Stanford don't exist. I mean, how can we possibly expect to recruit better players with our admission standards? These sorts of performances should be putting people's jobs on the line. The ghost of John McKay should rise from the grave to answer the question,

"What do you think of your team's execution?" with,
"I'm all for it."

“Slur?” Are you kidding me?
 

ChappyCat

Redshirt
Sep 19, 2015
581
4
0
I love Fitz- I really do, but you aren't aggressive on offense for three weeks, but you decide to get aggressive on a 2 pt play when a PAT puts you down 14?? If you wanna roll the dice to WIN the game, do it after your final score
 

Jonny2TheP

Senior
Dec 11, 2007
8,619
429
57
I love that decision to go for 2. Even though it didn’t work. That playcall usually works. Brilliant.

I really don’t understand that call to go for two. Really makes no sense to me when you have shown this week and last week how much your offense struggles in goal line situations.
 

freewillie07

Sophomore
Aug 22, 2017
5,240
100
48
I really don’t understand that call to go for two. Really makes no sense to me when you have shown this week and last week how much your offense struggles in goal line situations.

I kind of think that Fitz thought “if we score 11, and Wisconsin doesn’t score the rest of the game, we can say we outscored them on offense.”
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
47,090
3,436
78
Yes - create overload sides. Bring in max protect to give more time (in theory).

I can see you’re not interested in really reading the gist of my posts, so whatever - keep flaming.

Because you think we could put two or three men in patterns and get open?
 

HawkCat

Senior
May 29, 2001
8,145
598
113
Why was that Jefferson catch not reviewed in such a close game? Might cost us here.
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
47,090
3,436
78
You got it, bud. It's meant to shut down debate, like in politics, when slurring someone as a "racist/sexist/bigot/homphobe" is used in place of an intelligent argument.

You need some thicker skin and a backbone if you think “troll” is a slur.
 

Jonny2TheP

Senior
Dec 11, 2007
8,619
429
57
It’s just garbage time.

Agree 100% he’s not facing nearly what Hunter was, but glad to see he’s taking what they give him. Also building confidence for what could be a possible start next week depending on the extent of Hunter’s injury:
 

freewillie07

Sophomore
Aug 22, 2017
5,240
100
48
Agree 100% he’s not facing nearly what Hunter was, but glad to see he’s taking what they give him. Also building confidence for what could be a possible start next week depending on the extent of Hunter’s injury:

Oh yes definitely. But people could easily get the wrong impression that he is an upgrade over Hunter. Which he clearly is not.
 

BFDCat

Freshman
Aug 28, 2013
1,110
57
48
Seriously? Is the kicker hurt? Do we not have a backup? Can't wait for Fitzs smart *** ******** after the game.