NU/PU Prediction Thread
- Thread starter rmndcat
- Start date
I've been thinking 28-17 for the last several weeks, so I'm not going to change it now. It feels like a low-scoring game to me, though 45 total points isn't THAT low.
There will be at least one TD that will come from the D (either the D scoring it or the D making a play to get the O in good field position).
Purdue will also score early and will lead some in the first half before NU pulls away in the third quarter.
Thorson plays and has a workmanlike game. Cam Green gets NU's first TD of the season. Larkin is good but nothing spectacular (like 19 carries for 88 yards or something), and Moten/Bowser get a few carries as well.
There will be at least one TD that will come from the D (either the D scoring it or the D making a play to get the O in good field position).
Purdue will also score early and will lead some in the first half before NU pulls away in the third quarter.
Thorson plays and has a workmanlike game. Cam Green gets NU's first TD of the season. Larkin is good but nothing spectacular (like 19 carries for 88 yards or something), and Moten/Bowser get a few carries as well.
NU27
Purdon’t 23
I beleive CT will start but will not play the complete game. I also think both teams will not eclipse the over.
Purdon’t 23
I beleive CT will start but will not play the complete game. I also think both teams will not eclipse the over.
NU 27 PU 13. I think Hank has the D ready; just a question of whether CT is healthy and the offense clicks.
NU 33
Purdue 21
Green starts at QB. NU in the red zone on their second drive. No score. First down and 10 on the 18 and CT comes in. Green stays in. On that first down CT completes a pass to Green (TJ not Cameron) in the end zone for the first score. Why the trick play? Diversionary strategy. NU never trails, wins by 12. In the third Q, Green spells CT, passes to Green (Cameron) for NU's third touchdown, demonstrating NU's backup QB plan--Green to Green. Finally we have a QB back-up plan.
Purdue 21
Green starts at QB. NU in the red zone on their second drive. No score. First down and 10 on the 18 and CT comes in. Green stays in. On that first down CT completes a pass to Green (TJ not Cameron) in the end zone for the first score. Why the trick play? Diversionary strategy. NU never trails, wins by 12. In the third Q, Green spells CT, passes to Green (Cameron) for NU's third touchdown, demonstrating NU's backup QB plan--Green to Green. Finally we have a QB back-up plan.
OH, what a fun game! You could have at least put "Spoiler alert" at the beginning.
NU 24
PU 13
Boilers come out with a good script against our too predictable and conservative D and score on opening posession. Hank adjusts and holds them to 2 FGs for remainder of the game, which is a huge accomplishment as they go pass happy once they fall behind.
NUs offense looks like the experienced and veteran group that they are, not making big mistakes and moving the ball consistently against Boiler inexperienced D and questionable front 7. 2 rushing TDs, one passing and one FG that should have been a TD as Cats rediscover that they still can't run the ball 3 times from the 5 and score.
Cats get two takeaways during the game, one late in basically garbage time.
PU 13
Boilers come out with a good script against our too predictable and conservative D and score on opening posession. Hank adjusts and holds them to 2 FGs for remainder of the game, which is a huge accomplishment as they go pass happy once they fall behind.
NUs offense looks like the experienced and veteran group that they are, not making big mistakes and moving the ball consistently against Boiler inexperienced D and questionable front 7. 2 rushing TDs, one passing and one FG that should have been a TD as Cats rediscover that they still can't run the ball 3 times from the 5 and score.
Cats get two takeaways during the game, one late in basically garbage time.
This is an interesting game. There are no fans on either board that think the other team will win. I expect Thorson to play the entire game, and he may have a little rust early, but will be fine.
I will say NU 27 Purdue 21
The difference will be our young D will give up some big plays, but I would be shocked if this game is a blowout either way. Good luck!
I will say NU 27 Purdue 21
The difference will be our young D will give up some big plays, but I would be shocked if this game is a blowout either way. Good luck!
I don’t know who will win this game but I am highly confident in saying that Brohm and Purdue won’t hang 30+ on our defense. In fact, I am not sure they can get into the 20s. If our offense struggles and Purdue plays well, I think this will be a close Purdue victory (21-17). If Thorson/Larkin come out firing and get us a lead, our defense plays as well as we think they can and Purdue becomes a pass happy/one dimensional team trying to come from behind, then I think it is more likely that NU wins comfortably (31-13).
Corbi, I'm not sure anyone knows who will win. This is a prediction thread. For the Dr Know thread see another thread setter.
PU 27
NU 21
As much as I hate to write this...we don't start fast, even if Thorson starts he will likely be tentative. I'm not sure I completely trust the SkyTeam just yet, they have a new coach there that hasn't done that position in a long time and while I love the players I'm not sure about Williams as a corner we can leave alone and the safeties where they can throw over the top.
I think we'll be able to run eventually on them but it may be too little too late.
NU 21
As much as I hate to write this...we don't start fast, even if Thorson starts he will likely be tentative. I'm not sure I completely trust the SkyTeam just yet, they have a new coach there that hasn't done that position in a long time and while I love the players I'm not sure about Williams as a corner we can leave alone and the safeties where they can throw over the top.
I think we'll be able to run eventually on them but it may be too little too late.
I expect us to start slow and fall behind and then take over and win the game. However, I think it will be a one-score close game.
NU 24 PU 17
I am impressed with both of the Purdue quarterbacks’ success in connecting with their receivers and expect our secondary to be well tested. On the other hand I believe our defense is capable of shutting down the run game to keep the opponent’s offense one dimensional. If we can make stops in the red zone we should be able to pull out what I expect to be a close game.
I am impressed with both of the Purdue quarterbacks’ success in connecting with their receivers and expect our secondary to be well tested. On the other hand I believe our defense is capable of shutting down the run game to keep the opponent’s offense one dimensional. If we can make stops in the red zone we should be able to pull out what I expect to be a close game.
Last edited:
We are going to crush them. That's the story. This is our best team since our last BigTen championship. At least two scores.
I'll go with 27-21 Cats. But this game eerily reminds me of the opener against Western Michigan predictions from a few years ago. Seemed like EVERYONE thought we were gonna steamroll them.
Larkin busts for 150+ as we rush for over 200 yards and control LOS. Purdue throws for 300+ but bend don't break D survives.
Larkin busts for 150+ as we rush for over 200 yards and control LOS. Purdue throws for 300+ but bend don't break D survives.
I think it will not be a very high-scoring game, but the Cats win. The hell with the pointspread
I mostly agree with this except that I'm worried about our secondary giving up big plays. I have a feeling they'll throw early and often. The DBs will get a good test. I'm fairly confident in Montre, Trae and Alonzo have been mixed over the years so hopefully they'll have grown into more prominent roles this year. Also I think JR Pace has tons of potential but this is an entirely different ball game. And McGee is transitioning from a part-time player to a full-time starter, which won't be easy.
If we hold them under 300 yards passing I'd be happy. Of course, as we all know our Cover 4 is designed to give up yards and force the other team to consistently execute between the 20s, then tighten up in the red zone and limit points. So lots of passing yards may not == lots of points. But we will see...
So CT is only worth 4 more points than Green/next man up? And if CT plays, our defense is one TD better?
Weaker QB equals more turnovers and losing field position IMO. Certainly could mean an extra 7 points for Purdue, no matter how good our D is.
Latest
-
01
Wildcat Report
Recruit Roundup: Johnson snags highlight-reel TD, Norman rushes for two scores
-
02
Wildcat Report
Northwestern aggressively pursuing Arkansas WR commit Darion Moseley
-
03
Rivals
Several schools appealing to 2028 DL PJ Tautu
-
04
Rivals
Behind a third-generation Wildcat, Northwestern is building, retaining, and set to open its new stadium
-
05
Wildcat Report
Northwestern's defensive line aims to create havoc despite lack of previous production