Wiscy without questions. The reasons include:
1) Wisky will almost certainly finish in the top 36 (they were #24 before the BTT). It's good that they get an AQ which would release an AL bid for those ranked below 36.
2) Michigan ended ranked lower than NU in the B1G and NU beat them in their only match. They may be ranked lowered than NU by the committee,even as the losing BTT finalist.
3) NU's win in Madison (and loss in the BTT) "look better" if Wisky is the BTT champ.
Definitely, it's better for NU that Wisky wins the AQ.
1) Wisky will almost certainly finish in the top 36 (they were #24 before the BTT). It's good that they get an AQ which would release an AL bid for those ranked below 36.
2) Michigan ended ranked lower than NU in the B1G and NU beat them in their only match. They may be ranked lowered than NU by the committee,even as the losing BTT finalist.
3) NU's win in Madison (and loss in the BTT) "look better" if Wisky is the BTT champ.
Definitely, it's better for NU that Wisky wins the AQ.
Last edited:
