Commit #9 in the bag on Sunday

Jul 25, 2011
7,676
539
113
 

nu08

Redshirt
Dec 11, 2009
299
1
0
Sounds like calcaterra based on Fitz's last tweet.

Edit: Disregard. Probably wrong assumption on my part
 
Last edited:

PZAZ

Redshirt
Jul 5, 2014
268
11
0
If it is, I suspect Wolma or Pugh may find themselves as a DE or linebacker. Lots of flexibility here!
 

T_Levine

Redshirt
May 26, 2010
2,197
34
0
6'4 230 but a 5'0 40 time is very slow for a super back. Even te run in the 4'8 94 range.

Thoughts?
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
6'4 230 but a 5'0 40 time is very slow for a super back. Even te run in the 4'8 94 range.

Thoughts?

Our future depth chart there is thin as I suspect at least one of the TEs from previous classes will outgrow the position. I think Wolma is plenty fast enough for a HS TE and will get faster with physical maturity. I think both stay at TE.
 

Seattle_Cat

Freshman
Sep 8, 2003
5,278
65
0
Our future depth chart there is thin as I suspect at least one of the TEs from previous classes will outgrow the position. I think Wolma is plenty fast enough for a HS TE and will get faster with physical maturity. I think both stay at TE.

In our offense athleticism and size seem to be more important than speed for a SB. Of course faster is always better.
 

Purple Pile Driver

All-Conference
May 14, 2014
27,651
2,983
113
Our future depth chart there is thin as I suspect at least one of the TEs from previous classes will outgrow the position. I think Wolma is plenty fast enough for a HS TE and will get faster with physical maturity. I think both stay at TE.

It's a great opportunity for both of them to see the field as a RS Fresh. I wouldn't be surprised if one of them saw the field as a true freshman. We needed to lock up 2 SB's this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BoJERJ

shakes3858

All-Conference
Aug 28, 2009
22,143
1,079
0
It's too bad we didn't have a spring "game." We would've gotten some recruits had we done that #willycat
 
  • Like
Reactions: nycat33