Conference Title Game Prediction Thread

Hungry Jack

All-American
Nov 17, 2008
38,840
5,800
67
I think we need this thread to safeguard democracy and free expression. After all, football vigilance is the price of freedom.

Here goes:
B1G: MSU (I think QB play gives them the edge here)
ACC: Clemson
SEC: Bama
PAC-12: USC (I think it's really hard to beat a team a second time; and this board will melt down like Fukushima if SU wins and reaches the playoff)
 
  • Like
Reactions: SkolCats

Alaskawildkat

Senior
Dec 28, 2005
20,809
561
113
Not sure about this board melting down if Stanford wins. For those still holding out hope for a New Year's Six bowl don't we need Stanford to do well to help us in moving up in the ratings?
 
  • Like
Reactions: IGNORE2

DaCat

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
25,780
2,211
113
If Stanford loses to USC, is there any scenario where they would be matched up against NU in a bowl game? That would be sweet to meet them in a bowl and smack them down again. In the afternoon. In California preferably.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alaskawildkat

Hungry Jack

All-American
Nov 17, 2008
38,840
5,800
67
If Stanford loses to USC, is there any scenario where they would be matched up against NU in a bowl game? That would be sweet to meet them in a bowl and smack them down again. In the afternoon. In California preferably.

Other than perhaps some schadenfreude directed at some nebulously define media interests, there is absolutely zero benefit to playing Stanford again this year.

I'd rather play an SEC school or even Notre Dame.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rmndcat and Fitz51

rmndcat

Junior
Sep 4, 2009
2,805
234
63
I think we need this thread to safeguard democracy and free expression. After all, football vigilance is the price of freedom.

Here goes:
B1G: MSU (I think QB play gives them the edge here)
ACC: Clemson
SEC: Bama
PAC-12: USC (I think it's really hard to beat a team a second time; and this board will melt down like Fukushima if SU wins and reaches the playoff)
Iowa
UNC
Bama
Stanford because any day that USC loses is a good day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hungry Jack

GlideCat

Senior
Jan 19, 2013
7,769
846
0
B1G: MSU (Comfortably - Iowa scores less than 10 points)
ACC: UNC (Clemson seems to be ebbing while UNC is rising)
SEC: Alabama (Not close and painful to watch)
PAC-12: USC (Coin toss but I am going with the fact that it is hard to beat someone twice)
AAC: Temple (defense wins championships)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hungry Jack

DaCat

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
25,780
2,211
113
B1G: MSU - would like to see Iowa win, but Dantonio often seems to find a way to win close games
ACC: Clemson
SEC: Bama
PAC-12: Stanford - hey we beat a damn good team

I don't want to see dOSU make it to the Final Four. If Iowa beats MSU, would a 1-loss dOSU jump a 2-loss MSU even though MSU beat them?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hungry Jack

ichawks

Redshirt
Dec 31, 2002
6,448
19
25
B1G: MSU (Comfortably - Iowa scores less than 10 points)
ACC: UNC (Clemson seems to be ebbing while UNC is rising)
SEC: Alabama (Not close and painful to watch)
PAC-12: USC (Coin toss but I am going with the fact that it is hard to beat someone twice)
AAC: Temple (defense wins championships)
Didn't Nebraska put 38 on MSU but Iowa won't score more than 10? I think your overestimating MSU or underestimating Iowa.
 

GlideCat

Senior
Jan 19, 2013
7,769
846
0
Didn't Nebraska put 38 on MSU but Iowa won't score more than 10? I think your overestimating MSU or underestimating Iowa.
Not big on the transitive thing. Iowa's offense matches up very well against some defenses - ours for example. However, I do not think y'all match up well against MSU. I rooting for Iowa but do not believe that it is a good match-up for you. Particularly your offense versus their defense.
 

Just Gary

Sophomore
Dec 7, 2007
6,301
147
0
B1G - Iowa is more consistent. MSU is more talented but has been prone to mental breakdown. I'll go MSU by a fluke play.
ACC - Clemson but a FG. UNC may win this if they can get their offense going but I think the Clemson defense is better.
SEC - Alabama runs away with this. Florida will have trouble scoring.
P12 - Stanford. USC doesn't have a defense. Stanford has just enough defense to win.
AAC - Houston because I live in Houston and that's the sum of my knowledge on the AAC
 

MrCat95

Senior
Oct 10, 2006
9,047
609
81
Iowa over MSU in a very close game.

Toss up in Clemson vs NC game.

Alabama clobbers Florida.

Stanford beats USC.

Toss up in Houston vs Temple.
 
Sep 15, 2006
12,698
996
0
If Stanford loses to USC, is there any scenario where they would be matched up against NU in a bowl game? That would be sweet to meet them in a bowl and smack them down again. In the afternoon. In California preferably.

Nah. Would be nice to beat them again, but if they win it supports the whole narrative that we were lucky to beat them in the first place. Besides, who wants to play someone you've already played in a bowl game? Not me.
 

Alaskawildkat

Senior
Dec 28, 2005
20,809
561
113
B1G: MSU - would like to see Iowa win, but Dantonio often seems to find a way to win close games
ACC: Clemson
SEC: Bama
PAC-12: Stanford - hey we beat a damn good team

I don't want to see dOSU make it to the Final Four. If Iowa beats MSU, would a 1-loss dOSU jump a 2-loss MSU even though MSU beat them?

How much would that potentially cost Northwestern if Stanford stole a slot that Iowa or OSU would have been able to join with MSU in the playoff games? Assuming all the New Year's Six, including the playoff games, pay the same the money differential would not be immediate, However, if the two B1G teams end up playing each other for the National Championship wouldn't that be a huge $ bonanza for the B1G or is there some rule capping out what one conference can take home in such a circumstance?

Assuming it means more money to be divided by the B1G I am all for getting two B1G teams into the playoff games and leaving Stanford home. Otherwise, it could only help our SOS for Stanford to advance and along with some other chaos just might get Northwestern up to #10 or #11 to qualify for a New Year's Six slot.
 
Last edited:

HawkCat

Senior
May 29, 2001
8,162
635
113
Loneliest planetary being= Clemson punter
Wow. Clemson won 45-37 after a ref totally robbed UNC of a recovered onside kick with over a minute left and UNC with three timeouts remaining. The ref called UNC for offsides when the closest UNC player was about a yard away from being offsides. One of those plays that really makes you question whether a conference agenda affects the officiating.
 

GlideCat

Senior
Jan 19, 2013
7,769
846
0
Wow. Clemson won 45-37 after a ref totally robbed UNC of a recovered onside kick with over a minute left and UNC with three timeouts remaining. The ref called UNC for offsides when the closest UNC player was about a yard away from being offsides. One of those plays that really makes you question whether a conference agenda affects the officiating.
Especially since that is the second obvious and game-breaking official call in that conference this year.
 

beetlemania74

Junior
Dec 7, 2008
6,997
347
0
Wow. Clemson won 45-37 after a ref totally robbed UNC of a recovered onside kick with over a minute left and UNC with three timeouts remaining. The ref called UNC for offsides when the closest UNC player was about a yard away from being offsides. One of those plays that really makes you question whether a conference agenda affects the officiating.
Strange too that they couldn't review the call. Seems like anything and everything should be reviewable on an onsides kick.
 
Wildcat Report

Latest

  1. 01 Wildcat Report Northwestern announces $35 million donation to the football program from the Uihleins
  2. 02 Edgy Tim 2028 DE Chadick is on the rise
  3. 03 Wildcat Report Ten Questions: 6. How good will Northwestern's secondary be?
  4. 04 Wildcat Report Notebook: Braun talks start of fall camp, quarterback timeline and Carsello's return
  5. 05 Wildcat Report Ten Questions: 5. Will Northwestern defend the New Ryan Field?