thorsin and Oliver aren't good enough

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chambers1

Redshirt
Oct 17, 2015
12
1
0
These two quarterbacks are brutal. Luckily the team around them are good enough to pull off wins.
 

Gladeskat

All-Conference
Feb 16, 2004
116,629
1,824
113
Thorson is learning. He looked fine running the ball in the 4th quarter.
 

Gladeskat

All-Conference
Feb 16, 2004
116,629
1,824
113
He looked great on the first three passes. Not so good after that. We need the running threat Thorson provides, IMO.
 

7levery7

Redshirt
Sep 21, 2003
860
2
0
Thorson's running is one reason the Cats are 8-2, the other huge factor is NU's athleticism on defense.
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
These two quarterbacks are brutal. Luckily the team around them are good enough to pull off wins.

Good enough for what? Thorson is 8-2 and basically single handedly led us downfield for the winning TD. It may not have looked conventional, but right now our offense just is not going to be conventional because we have issues with our OL and WR groups. We are a running football that needs to call designed runs for the QB in order to be effective. We did that in the first drive and scored a TD. We did it in the last drive and scored a TD. I have been a McCall fan but the play calling in between those two drives left a lot to be desired.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Pile Driver

mybrotha

Sophomore
Jul 21, 2011
2,162
107
0
Good enough for what? Thorson is 8-2 and basically single handedly led us downfield for the winning TD. It may not have looked conventional, but right now our offense just is not going to be conventional because we have issues with our OL and WR groups. We are a running football that needs to call designed runs for the QB in order to be effective. We did that in the first drive and scored a TD. We did it in the last drive and scored a TD. I have been a McCall fan but the play calling in between those two drives left a lot to be desired.
Corbi agreed and plus 1000! Thorson needs to continually be a threat running to open up the passing game. Right now is just not a good enough pocket passer to be threat throwing from there. For the record as well I have no problem with him being pulled for two series. The kid is not Brady and he had done nothing since the first drive.
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
I didn't say Thorson is not a good enough pocket passer. I said our offense just isn't really effective passing team right now.
 

techtim72

Senior
May 10, 2010
7,234
684
113
I agree it would be effective for Thorson to run more but he sure looks awkward when he does. He runs too erect and struggles with sliding. Definitely not a natural runner although when he gets loose he can cause some damage. My fear is if they do run him more, with his running style he will be very susceptible to getting hurt. So, my vote is, at least for this year, he runs enough. Work on his passing.
 

Deeringfish

All-Conference
Jun 23, 2008
21,308
1,448
63
I agree it would be effective for Thorson to run more but he sure looks awkward when he does. He runs too erect and struggles with sliding. Definitely not a natural runner although when he gets loose he can cause some damage. My fear is if they do run him more, with his running style he will be very susceptible to getting hurt. So, my vote is, at least for this year, he runs enough. Work on his passing.
He is a tall runner and that looks wrong and make sliding difficult. He really is fast and when he has some room to change direction with out losing momentum he fakes people out and goes by them. I feel like taking the licks he took against PSU actually made him braver. He has very little swagger and that is what he needs. Of course you don't want him to get hurt but I feel like a few licks will make him feel like, "Is that all you got." He is a big guy he should be able to put it to those little guys in the secondary.
 

Sheffielder

Senior
Sep 1, 2004
9,931
735
113
Hey, no complaints about the offense here, you'll offend some people. Raises and contract extensions for every offensive coach. 8-2 is all that matters, no room for criticism.
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
I don't care what it looks like. This isn't a beauty contest. He needs the defense to account for him as a runner for NU to be effective. I agree it makes him more susceptible to injury but so be it. I want NU to win out.
 

FeliSilvestris

Redshirt
Oct 21, 2004
3,493
22
0
Good enough for what? Thorson is 8-2 and basically single handedly led us downfield for the winning TD. It may not have looked conventional, but right now our offense just is not going to be conventional because we have issues with our OL and WR groups.
By your 8-2 argument, the WR corp and the OL are also good enough. The entire team is 8-2.
That does NOT mean that every player is performing at the level that the team needs to achieve its goals. A team may win IN SPITE of the performance by certain player or unit, not because of it.
CT is currently ranked #90 in the FBS per total QBR. The team needs much better than that (8-2 or not).
 
  • Like
Reactions: wildcatson

EvanstonCat

Senior
May 29, 2001
50,776
776
73
Thorson's running is one reason the Cats are 8-2, the other huge factor is NU's athleticism on defense.

Thorson's passing is one reason the Cats are 8-2 and not 10-0. If we had decent QB play (better WR and OLs would help too) we could be better than 8-2.
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
By your 8-2 argument, the WR corp and the OL are also good enough. The entire team is 8-2.
That does NOT mean that every player is performing at the level that the team needs to achieve its goals. A team may win IN SPITE of the performance by certain player or unit, not because of it.
CT is currently ranked #90 in the FBS per total QBR. The team needs much better than that (8-2 or not).

The QB is the most important and impactful player on the team. You can't win without a good QB whose skills fit the identity of the team. Thorson is exactly that for this NU team. I feel strongly we would not have as good a record this year if a QB with the skill set of a Trevor Siemian was QB this team this year.
 

CSCatFan1

Senior
Dec 4, 2002
39,976
464
83
Thorson's passing is one reason the Cats are 8-2 and not 10-0. If we had decent QB play (better WR and OLs would help too) we could be better than 8-2.

Sure...and if "if's and but's were bitches and sluts" Glades would be getting laid every night.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NUCat320

EvanstonCat

Senior
May 29, 2001
50,776
776
73
I would definitely like to see an open competition for the starting QB slot next year. I don't know if Aidan Smith is a wunderkind or not. I'd like to see the walkon TJ Green get a real shot as well.
 

NJCat83588

Senior
Jun 5, 2001
8,874
456
0
I would definitely like to see an open competition for the starting QB slot next year. I don't know if Aidan Smith is a wunderkind or not. I'd like to see the walkon TJ Green get a real shot as well.

If memory serves me correctly, Green is a "preferred walk-on" which means he will be on scholarship next season. So he isn't your typical walk-on. I seriously doubt Smith will be in the equation as a true freshman. The competition will come down to Thorson, Alviti and Green. I'd be shocked if Clayton doesn't prevail.
 

FeliSilvestris

Redshirt
Oct 21, 2004
3,493
22
0
The QB is the most important and impactful player on the team. You can't win without a good QB whose skills fit the identity of the team. Thorson is exactly that for this NU team.
None of that changes the fact that CT is ranked exactly at #90 per total QBR in the FBS.
NU beat PSU under ZO. He went 11-24 for 111 ys (his QBR for the game would place him well below #100 in the FBS). It would be crazy to argue that because NU managed to win, ZO had a good performance.
By the same token, a QB could go 23/30 for 400 yds with 5 TD and no INT, but his team may fail to win the game. Does that mean that his performance cannot be judged great because his team lost?
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
The QB is the most important and impactful player on the team. You can't win without a good QB whose skills fit the identity of the team. Thorson is exactly that for this NU team.
If memory serves me correctly, Green is a "preferred walk-on" which means he will be on scholarship next season. So he isn't your typical walk-on. I seriously doubt Smith will be in the equation as a true freshman. The competition will come down to Thorson, Alviti and Green. I'd be shocked if Clayton doesn't prevail.

Preferred walk on does not mean that Green will get a scholarship next year. You may be confusing that term with the concept of grey shirt which essentially is a deferred scholarship offer.

Regarding Thorson, he will be our starter for the next three years and we will all be very pleased about that. That includes the current naysayers on this board who wouldn't know what a good young QB looks like if a young Joe Montana was staring them straight in the face.
 

Cookie1966

Redshirt
Oct 24, 2015
119
11
0
If memory serves me correctly, Green is a "preferred walk-on" which means he will be on scholarship next season. So he isn't your typical walk-on. I seriously doubt Smith will be in the equation as a true freshman. The competition will come down to Thorson, Alviti and Green. I'd be shocked if Clayton doesn't prevail.

There is now way smith signs here unless he was told he would have a shot. He had too many other offers. Alviti has no shot. Ya gotta be able to throw the football (a little at least) in this offense and he can't
From what I have read smith has really impressed in these 7 on 7 camps.
His completion percent his senior year is like 68. That's pretty damn good for HS. Looking forward to qb competition next year
 
Sep 15, 2006
12,698
996
0
None of that changes the fact that CT is ranked exactly at #90 per total QBR in the FBS.
NU beat PSU under ZO. He went 11-24 for 111 ys (his QBR for the game would place him well below #100 in the FBS). It would be crazy to argue that because NU managed to win, ZO had a good performance.
By the same token, a QB could go 23/30 for 400 yds with 5 TD and no INT, but his team may fail to win the game. Does that mean that his performance cannot be judged great because his team lost?

And by the same token, Oliver could have lost the game if he'd come in and turned into a turnover machine as during the Illinois game last year. Nobody is saying we've had scintillating QB play this year, but sometimes a QB can help his team just by not giving the game away. Our wideouts haven't helped matters with constant drive-killing drops this year. I recall one drop in particular by Jones that killed our opening second-half drive against Iowa when we were still in the game. It went downhill from there.
 

Cookie1966

Redshirt
Oct 24, 2015
119
11
0
Preferred walk on does not mean that Green will get a scholarship next year. You may be confusing that term with the concept of grey shirt which essentially is a deferred scholarship offer.

Regarding Thorson, he will be our starter for the next three years and we will all be very pleased about that. That includes the current naysayers on this board who wouldn't know what a good young QB looks like if a young Joe Montana was staring them straight in the face.


Haha. I take it you are the expert on what a good young qb looks like?? I hope your correct about him, but 51 percent completion in a dink and dunk passing game is brutal
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
Haha. I take it you are the expert on what a good young qb looks like?? I hope your correct about him, but 51 percent completion in a dink and dunk passing game is brutal

8-2 as a freshman QB with a supporting cast that is essentially the same as last year's team. That's all for now!
 

Gladeskat

All-Conference
Feb 16, 2004
116,629
1,824
113
None of that changes the fact that CT is ranked exactly at #90 per total QBR in the FBS.
NU beat PSU under ZO. He went 11-24 for 111 ys (his QBR for the game would place him well below #100 in the FBS). It would be crazy to argue that because NU managed to win, ZO had a good performance.
By the same token, a QB could go 23/30 for 400 yds with 5 TD and no INT, but his team may fail to win the game. Does that mean that his performance cannot be judged great because his team lost?

Yes. Dilfer >> Marino
 

Cookie1966

Redshirt
Oct 24, 2015
119
11
0
8-2 as a freshman QB with a supporting cast that is essentially the same as last year's team. That's all for now!

If you wanna believe they are winning games because of him that's you choice but reality is they are winning games inspite of him.
 
May 29, 2001
45,734
386
0
Aren't good enough for what? They're 8-2. It takes 22 guys
i think he means arent prductive enuf. Yes it takes 85 but the qb position is a clear and present weakness that gets expoited weekly by opposing defenses. In most games, our strengths can carry the qb position but when we play really good teams, the qb position is simply too heavy of a burden for our defense and KOR unit to carry.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.