on West Virginia versus the EPA. This will be very good for business in West Virginia as stated begin to receive their constitutionally granted authority back.
If you like the Constitution you want West Virginia to win. If you think the Sierra Club should be able to circumvent Congress and other elected officials in order to enforce their own rules on the public then you want West Virginia to lose.If you like clean air, water and the climate mostly as is then you want WV to lose this one.
I'm for doing what is necessary to keep climate change from causing more human misery than it has to.If you like the Constitution you want West Virginia to win. If you think the Sierra Club should be able to circumvent Congress and other elected officials in order to enforce their own rules on the public then you want West Virginia to lose.
I'm for doing what is necessary to keep climate change from causing more human misery than it has to.
Yeah? What does that have to do with this case?I'm for doing what is necessary to keep climate change from causing more human misery than it has to.
Really? perhaps you could learn what the case is about.Yeah? What does that have to do with this case?
Again, I read what the case is about. Did you?Really? perhaps you could learn what the case is about.
Go read about climate change and how greenhouse gases affect it.Again, I read what the case is about. Did you?
Go read about climate change and how greenhouse gases affect it.
Moe , like most greenies have not looked at the history of earth & how the climate has changed before mankind.Again, I read what the case is about. Did you?
Again, I did. I read the UN’s 2020 report. It basically says greenhouse gas concentrations, sea level rise, ocean heat and ocean acidification are all clear indications that human activity is causing climate change. Yet, the science presented in UN reports does not suggest human activities as the most significant contributors to those four factors.Go read about climate change and how greenhouse gases affect it.
you should move to India or China, and start up your own nerdy protest group.Go read about climate change and how greenhouse gases affect it.
The goal is to reduce carbon emissions not increase them.Again, I did. I read the UN’s 2020 report. It basically says greenhouse gas concentrations, sea level rise, ocean heat and ocean acidification are all clear indications that human activity is causing climate change. Yet, the science presented in UN reports does not suggest human activities as the most significant contributors to those four factors.
moe is still in his mom’s basement with an N95 mask on because he’s scared of Covid.you should move to India or China, and start up your own nerdy protest group.
The goal is to reduce carbon emissions not increase them.
TRUTH OVER FACTS SHEET: Pedo-Joe Sets 2030 Greenhouse Gas Pollution Reduction Target Aimed at Creating Good-Paying Union Jobs and Securing U.S. Leadership on Clean Energy Technologies
No one is arguing that’s not the goal. Secondarily, the argument is whether the science has established human activity as a significant contributor to global warming. Primarily, the argument is against bureaucratic overreach.The goal is to reduce carbon emissions not increase them.
FACT SHEET: President Biden Sets 2030 Greenhouse Gas Pollution Reduction Target Aimed at Creating Good-Paying Union Jobs and Securing U.S. Leadership on Clean Energy Technologies
The goal is to reduce carbon emissions not increase them.
FACT SHEET: President Biden Sets 2030 Greenhouse Gas Pollution Reduction Target Aimed at Creating Good-Paying Union Jobs and Securing U.S. Leadership on Clean Energy Technologies
If he was truly for a "green" America he would be protesting any product not made under American environmental standards.We've already done more than any other country. We have come close to eliminating diesel emissions. China and India haven't done a thing. Perhaps you should go on their message boards.
Well put.We've already done more than any other country. We have come close to eliminating diesel emissions. China and India haven't done a thing. Perhaps you should go on their message boards.
He would also be against foreign oil being shipped by tankers across the ocean. Far more environmental risk than a pipeline here in the US.If he was truly for a "green" America he would be protesting any product not made under American environmental standards.
Or the slave mining of cadmium. The slave workers in China making out green products...lmao ..let that sink in ....green products made in countries that give less than 0 ***** about the environment....my goodness just how gullible can today's Democrats be?He would also be against foreign oil being shipped by tankers across the ocean. Far more environmental risk than a pipeline here in the US.
Ok I did read...Go read about climate change and how greenhouse gases affect it.
Earth will never be destroyed, burned in fire, or replaced. The Bible teaches that God created the earth to be inhabited forever.I'm for doing what is necessary to keep climate change from causing more human misery than it has to.
Are you sure?Earth will never be destroyed, burned in fire, or replaced. The Bible teaches that God created the earth to be inhabited forever.
And that's why you're not in charge.We've already done more than any other country. We have come close to eliminating diesel emissions. China and India haven't done a thing. Perhaps you should go on their message boards.
“The righteous will possess the earth, and they will live forever on it.”—Psalm 37:29.Are you sure?
2 Peter 3:10-13–But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything done in it will be laid bare. Since everything will be destroyed in this way, what kind of people ought you to be? You ought to live holy and godly lives as you look forward to the day of God and speed its coming. That day will bring about the destruction of the heavens by fire, and the elements will melt in the heat. But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth, where righteousness dwells.
I would guess it depends on interpretation of scriptures. What I posted was one persons interpretation. I don't necessarily agree one hundred percent with but I do believe in God and welcome his return.Are you sure?
2 Peter 3:10-13–But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything done in it will be laid bare. Since everything will be destroyed in this way, what kind of people ought you to be? You ought to live holy and godly lives as you look forward to the day of God and speed its coming. That day will bring about the destruction of the heavens by fire, and the elements will melt in the heat. But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth, where righteousness dwells.
I'm a person who believes that if a person believes in the father , son & holy ghost & worships him things like this don't matter.I would guess it depends on interpretation of scriptures. What I posted was one persons interpretation. I don't necessarily agree one hundred percent with but I do believe in God and welcome his return.
Ok. The lawyers who presented the case and environmentalists ALL drive electric cars and have solar power. Right? If the US “cleans up” it’s air but nobody else in the world does, what is that helping? NOTHING.The goal is to reduce carbon emissions not increase them.
FACT SHEET: President Biden Sets 2030 Greenhouse Gas Pollution Reduction Target Aimed at Creating Good-Paying Union Jobs and Securing U.S. Leadership on Clean Energy Technologies
“The righteous will possess the earth, and they will live forever on it.”—Psalm 37:29.
“[God] has established the earth on its foundations; it will not be moved from its place forever and ever.”—Psalm 104:5.
“The earth remains forever.”—Ecclesiastes 1:4.
“The One who formed the earth, its Maker who firmly established it, . . . did not create it simply for nothing, but formed it to be inhabited.”—Isaiah 45:18.
God will not allow humans to ruin the earth completely by pollution, warfare, or any other means. Rather, he will “bring to ruin those ruining the earth.” (Revelation 11:18)
Similar to the waters of the Flood, the destruction, or “fire,” of 2 Peter 3:7 will bring an end to the world of wicked people, not to planet Earth. God promises “new heavens and a new earth” in which “righteousness is to dwell.” (2 Peter 3:13) A “new earth,” or new human society, will be ruled over by “new heavens,” or new leadership—God’s Kingdom. Under the rule of that Kingdom, the earth will become a peaceful paradise.—Revelation 21:1-4.
![]()
I think all those verses you quote are consistent with the verses I quoted.I would guess it depends on interpretation of scriptures. What I posted was one persons interpretation. I don't necessarily agree one hundred percent with but I do believe in God and welcome his return.
You and the mod are weak and easily discouraged.Ok. The lawyers who presented the case and environmentalists ALL drive electric cars and have solar power. Right? If the US “cleans up” it’s air but nobody else in the world does, what is that helping? NOTHING.
You and the mod are weak and easily discouraged.
Losing is not an option, no room for quitters or the easily defeated.And you are naive.
Words from a real insurrectionist party.Losing is not an option, no room for quitters or the easily defeated.
Kill all the democrats in congress, the executive branch and judicial and the US would be a much better placeI'm for doing what is necessary to keep climate change from causing more human misery than it has to.
The earth is covered by 70% water. Ten per cent of the land is inhabited by humans. Yeah, it makes sense that humans are really causing it. Just another way to steal your moneyNo one is arguing that’s not the goal. Secondarily, the argument is whether the science has established human activity as a significant contributor to global warming. Primarily, the argument is against bureaucratic overreach.
Is that due out next cycle?on West Virginia versus the EPA. This will be very good for business in West Virginia as stated begin to receive their constitutionally granted authority back.