So Biden confirms his Supreme Court nominee will be a black woman

[Blackberry Smoke]

So I'm guessing that eliminates probably 90% or so of the qualified candidates right off the bat? Seems rather discriminatory doesn't it? And maybe a little reverse racism as well?

I'm not sure what the best strategy from a Republican standpoint is here. Do you take him to task for the obvious re-ranking of qualifications set forth above? Do you fight the candidate tooth and nail if he goes radical left on his choice? Do you go after them for ignoring other more qualified candidates?

Part of me says the Republicans should remain totally silent on the selection and keep any comments or opposition to a minimum just to keep the DEMS from using this selection as the "top news item". The Democrats are obviously going to try to make this the "top news story" to divert attention from inflation, immigration, pandemic foreign affairs, etc. where Biden and his bunch are clearly failing.

Thoughts?

 

[ThePunish-EER]

Democrats are always racist. History proves I’m correct

 

[roadtrasheer]

Although the new supreme court nominee will come from the DSA tree Republicans should just let it happen. Biden will fill the seat , it will be a modern day liberal (socialist) nothing can be done .

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[WVU82_rivals]

@LifeNews

42m·
THEN: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

NOW: "I'm only nominating a black woman."

 

[Christian96]

any black-ish woman will do. they have to keep the black vote for 2022.

 

[ThePunish-EER]

any black-ish woman will do. they have to keep the black vote for 2022.

Yep. Pathetic. And no I’m not racist. I do not agree with affirmative action. I believe the most qualified person regardless of race and gender deserve the job.

 

[WVU82_rivals]

@anonpatriotq
4h··

We MUST review all collegiate yearbooks and social calendars from any Supreme Court nominees presented.

Any allegations of sexual misconduct, however far-fetched they may be, MUST be believed.

Thems the rules now.


--------------------------- or, will it go this way ---------------------

Republicans will never attack her for fear of being branded 'racist.'

They'll be unable to question her education, credentials or judicial record.

 

[dave]

He is doing his nominee a disservice by announcing he will choose a black woman.

He should have said he was going to look at a diverse group of qualified candidates and choose his best option. Then whoever he picks was the best of many.

Now instead it will be the best black woman.

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

He is doing his nominee a disservice by announcing he will choose a black woman.

He should have said he was going to look at a diverse group of qualified candidates and choose his best option. Then whoever he picks was the best of many.

Now instead it will be the best black woman.

Nailed it

 

[Christian96]

Yep. Pathetic. And no I’m not racist. I do not agree with affirmative action. I believe the most qualified person regardless of race and gender deserve the job.

Blacks have it made. It’s so funny. They can get a scholarship for being black. Get free education. Picked first for any job promotion. Yet it’s still whitey’s fault their inner cities are the most crime ridden in America.

 

[roadtrasheer]

She will always wonder if she was his true pick or just a have to pick .
Would hate to be this lady he picks . Republicans should just vote yes & move on so the pick just fizzles out, it wont change a thing in the make up

 

[Shirley Knott]

He is doing his nominee a disservice by announcing he will choose a black woman.

He should have said he was going to look at a diverse group of qualified candidates and choose his best option. Then whoever he picks was the best of many.

Now instead it will be the best black woman.

Would that happen to be Michael Obama ??

 

[Blackberry Smoke]

She will always wonder if she was his true pick or just a have to pick .
Would hate to be this lady he picks . Republicans should just vote yes & move on so the pick just fizzles out, it wont change a thing in the make up

I agree with this. The Republicans should be totally silent throughout this entire process (unless he picks some extreme left radical....I mean off the charts radical). Otherwise, let it sail through with no comment from the right and it quickly becomes a blip on the screen.

 

[phillya]

Senate Republicans shouldn't put up a big fight because confirmation is a fait a compli and the
voting mix of the court won't change anyway. Fighting the nomination is futile and would only serve to allow the Dems to brand Republicans as racist haters.
But Republicans should trumpet the radical positions of the nominee all over the media.
The country needs to know what the Marxist Democrat base stands for.
Then this radical new justice and her positions need to be hung around the necks of every Democrat running for office in the midterms; not just the Dem Senators who voted for her.

 

[moe]

So I'm guessing that eliminates probably 90% or so of the qualified candidates right off the bat? Seems rather discriminatory doesn't it? And maybe a little reverse racism as well?

I'm not sure what the best strategy from a Republican standpoint is here. Do you take him to task for the obvious re-ranking of qualifications set forth above? Do you fight the candidate tooth and nail if he goes radical left on his choice? Do you go after them for ignoring other more qualified candidates?

Part of me says the Republicans should remain totally silent on the selection and keep any comments or opposition to a minimum just to keep the DEMS from using this selection as the "top news item". The Democrats are obviously going to try to make this the "top news story" to divert attention from inflation, immigration, pandemic foreign affairs, etc. where Biden and his bunch are clearly failing.

Thoughts?

During his campaign for POTUS he said he would exactly this so why do you all act surprised? Joe is just keeping his promise. Trump put 3 crackers in there so there's that.

 

[moe]

Senate Republicans shouldn't put up a big fight because confirmation is a fait a compli and the
voting mix of the court won't change anyway. Fighting the nomination is futile and would only serve to allow the Dems to brand Republicans as racist haters.
But Republicans should trumpet the radical positions of the nominee all over the media.
The country needs to know what the Marxist Democrat base stands for.
Then this radical new justice and her positions need to be hung around the necks of every Democrat running for office in the midterms; not just the Dem Senators who voted for her.

:joy: :joy: :joy:

 

[Gunny46]

:joy: :joy: :joy:

Here's a black female judge for Biden to nominate.

https://www.mied.uscourts.gov/index.cfm?pageFunction=chambers&judgeid=30

U.S. District Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis

 

[ThePunish-EER]

During his campaign for POTUS he said he would exactly this so why do you all act surprised? Joe is just keeping his promise. Trump put 3 crackers in there so there's that.

“3 crackers”? smh. And you are preaching inclusion. You just called white people the “N” word. You should be ashamed of yourself. If you’re white, you’ve embarrassed your own race. If you’re black, you’re racist.

 

[moe]

“3 crackers”? smh. And you are preaching inclusion. You just called white people the “N” word. You should be ashamed of yourself. If you’re white, you’ve embarrassed your own race. If you’re black, you’re racist.

lol hey cracker

 

[roadtrasheer]

During his campaign for POTUS he said he would exactly this so why do you all act surprised? Joe is just keeping his promise. Trump put 3 crackers in there so there's that.

Not surprised a racist would choose someone because of color.
Not complaining about his choice, we know it won't be a good one from his decision making skills according to history, Kamala Harris is his latest.... drop out Joe..

 

[roadtrasheer]

lol hey cracker

Crackers are delicious & well loved all over the world....
Or they are a facility that breaks down oil & gas to all the useable chemicals.... makes lots of money & provides a very good living and a much needed service....yep I'm a cracker & proud

 

[ThePunish-EER]

lol hey cracker

It’s a reflection of your character. Glad you continue to out yourself. Duly noted.

 

[bornaneer]

During his campaign for POTUS he said he would exactly this so why do you all act surprised? Joe is just keeping his promise. Trump put 3 crackers in there so there's that.

Jan 27, 2022 2:27 PM :
In 2003, then-President George W. Bush nominated Janice Rogers Brown, an associate justice on the California Supreme Court to serve as a Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. She was the first black woman nominated for the federal bench.

Joe Biden, champion of civil rights and the president who has gloried in naming the first minorities to several positions in his administration, filibustered against her nomination and voted twice against her. When Biden had the chance to vote for a black woman, he declined.

 

[phillya]

Jan 27, 2022 2:27 PM :
In 2003, then-President George W. Bush nominated Janice Rogers Brown, an associate justice on the California Supreme Court to serve as a Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. She was the first black woman nominated for the federal bench.

Joe Biden, champion of civil rights and the president who has gloried in naming the first minorities to several positions in his administration, filibustered against her nomination and voted twice against her. When Biden had the chance to vote for a black woman, he declined.

More proof Biden is a racist

 

[bornaneer]

More proof Biden is a racist

Biden says he is for a diverse SCOTUS....Biden voted against Clarence Thomas in the Senate Judiciary Committee, he argued against him on the Senate floor, and he voted against his confirmation to a lifetime seat on the Supreme"​

 

[dave]

During his campaign for POTUS he said he would exactly this so why do you all act surprised? Joe is just keeping his promise. Trump put 3 crackers in there so there's that.

Good post racist.

 

[moe]

Jan 27, 2022 2:27 PM :
In 2003, then-President George W. Bush nominated Janice Rogers Brown, an associate justice on the California Supreme Court to serve as a Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. She was the first black woman nominated for the federal bench.

Joe Biden, champion of civil rights and the president who has gloried in naming the first minorities to several positions in his administration, filibustered against her nomination and voted twice against her. When Biden had the chance to vote for a black woman, he declined.

Brown was nominated by President George W. Bush to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on July 25, 2003 to fill the seat vacated by Stephen F. Williams.

The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on her nomination on October 22. After her name had passed out of committee and had been sent to the full Senate, there was a failed cloture vote on her nomination on November 14, 2003. Brown's nomination was returned to the President under the standing rules of the Senate when the 108th United States Congress adjourned.[citation needed]

Bush renominated Brown on February 14, 2005, early in the first session of the 109th United States Congress. On April 21, 2005, the Senate Judiciary Committee again endorsed Brown and referred her name to the full Senate. On May 23, Senator John McCain announced an agreement between seven Republican and seven Democratic U.S. Senators to ensure an up-or-down vote on Brown and several other stalled Bush nominees.[citation needed]

During the summer of 2005, Brown was also considered as a possible nominee to replace Sandra Day O'Connor on the United States Supreme Court, but Samuel Alito was chosen instead.[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janice_Rogers_Brown

 

[moe]

Biden says he is for a diverse SCOTUS....Biden voted against Clarence Thomas in the Senate Judiciary Committee, he argued against him on the Senate floor, and he voted against his confirmation to a lifetime seat on the Supreme"​

Keep hating. Joe will reap the rewards (black vote) while all you have is tears.

 

[NYC_Eer]

So I'm guessing that eliminates probably 90% or so of the qualified candidates right off the bat? Seems rather discriminatory doesn't it? And maybe a little reverse racism as well?

I'm not sure what the best strategy from a Republican standpoint is here. Do you take him to task for the obvious re-ranking of qualifications set forth above? Do you fight the candidate tooth and nail if he goes radical left on his choice? Do you go after them for ignoring other more qualified candidates?

Part of me says the Republicans should remain totally silent on the selection and keep any comments or opposition to a minimum just to keep the DEMS from using this selection as the "top news item". The Democrats are obviously going to try to make this the "top news story" to divert attention from inflation, immigration, pandemic foreign affairs, etc. where Biden and his bunch are clearly failing.

Thoughts?

You do realize that African Americans and women don't have the same opportunities to be Federal Judges as white guys have. So, he's trying to give an African American woman a chance...it will also help diversify the opinions and make up of the Court. That is the opposite of racist, but I'm positive no Trumper on here will see it that way.

 

[bornaneer]

Keep hating. Joe will reap the rewards (black vote) while all you have is tears.

I won't be shedding any tears...Joe can pick whom ever he wants...you win some and you lose some. The court will still be 6-3 and the 3 will all be women...your tears will be of joy...but you are still holding a losing hand.

 

[dave]

You do realize that African Americans and women don't have the same opportunities to be Federal Judges as white guys have. So, he's trying to give an African American woman a chance...it will also help diversify the opinions and make up of the Court. That is the opposite of racist, but I'm positive no Trumper on here will see it that way.

Even if what you said is true and it isn't. He is the one diminishing his choice by narrowing the search field.

He could have looked at everyone regardless of race or gender and chose a black woman.

 

[dave]

Keep hating. Joe will reap the rewards (black vote) while all you have is tears.

Joe called Clarence Thomas the N word.

So funny.

 

[bornaneer]

You do realize that African Americans and women don't have the same opportunities to be Federal Judges as white guys have. So, he's trying to give an African American woman a chance...it will also help diversify the opinions and make up of the Court. That is the opposite of racist, but I'm positive no Trumper on here will see it that way.

So you are trumpeting Clarence Thomas?

I have zero problems with a African American woman on the court.

People of color have the same opportunities as anyone to be on the courts...this is 2022....not 1950.

Do you watch ads on TV?

 

[dave]

So you are trumpeting Clarence Thomas?

I have zero problems with a African American woman on the court.

People of color have the same opportunities as anyone to be on the courts...this is 2022....not 1950.

Do you watch ads on TV?

Apparently black women have better opportunities to be on the Supreme Court since Joe doesn't consider anyone other than black women.

 

[moe]

People of color have the same opportunities as anyone to be on the courts...this is 2022....not 1950.

Do you any evidence to back that up (diversity stats on Fed judges) or is that just your baseless feeling? I'm going with the later. It's nice that you feel that way though.

 

[Gunny46]

Here's a black female judge for Biden to nominate.

https://www.mied.uscourts.gov/index.cfm?pageFunction=chambers&judgeid=30

U.S. District Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis

You do realize that African Americans and women don't have the same opportunities to be Federal Judges as white guys have. So, he's trying to give an African American woman a chance...it will also help diversify the opinions and make up of the Court. That is the opposite of racist, but I'm positive no Trumper on here will see it that way.

So you would be good with Judge Davis?

 

[Gunny46]

Here's a black female judge for Biden to nominate.

https://www.mied.uscourts.gov/index.cfm?pageFunction=chambers&judgeid=30

U.S. District Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis

Do you any evidence to back that up (diversity stats on Fed judges) or is that just your baseless feeling? I'm going with the later. It's nice that you feel that way though.

Judge Davis. Yes or No?

 

[NYC_Eer]

Even if what you said is true and it isn't. He is the one diminishing his choice by narrowing the search field.

He could have looked at everyone regardless of race or gender and chose a black woman.

So, your stance is women have historically as many opportunities as men and blacks have had as many opportunities as whites? That's laughable.

And in the history of the United States there have only been 7 black women that have served as Federal Appeals Court Judges, which is typically the key credential in becoming a Justice. That screams of equal opportunity right?

Its no surprise that white male Presidents choose white male Justices. Just as its no surprise white Trumper males are scared of what a black woman will do to them.

 

[dave]

So, your stance is women have historically as many opportunities as men and blacks have had as many opportunities as whites? That's laughable.

And in the history of the United States there have only been 7 black women that have served as Federal Appeals Court Judges, which is typically the key credential in becoming a Justice. That screams of equal opportunity right?

Its no surprise that white male Presidents choose white male Justices. Just as its no surprise white Trumper males are scared of what a black woman will do to them.

I know it is easier for simple minded fools to argue with someone when you put words in their mouth and you tell them what they think.

I just laugh at you because you are not smart enough to keep up.