Don’t need data to know masks don’t work. It’s called common sense, which the left lack.The data seem to consider ALL face coverings (masks if you wish) are equal and totally a single , unified variable. I find this to be erroneous and a simplistic approach to the data collection. Far better to break out the data in several categories representing the top several types/ classes of masks on use. Also need separate break-out of vaccinated (complete regimen as stated by manufacturer) vs. non-vaccinated AND further broken down as to which vaccine was administered.
Without such break-out data conclusions drawn may be, at best, misleading. End result is quite likely to be quite erroneous conclusions about the REAL results of the study. Bad data or poorly reported data is no better than having never initiated an investigation .
Lol, at least mine isn’t covered in face diapers. Is it prevent covid or to cover up that ugly mug? Libtards are so clicheI live in your head rent free…..
Oh so he’s obese, that explains a lotFat John is a big time science denier lol
Nobody is mandating N95 masks though...so what is the point?The data seem to consider ALL face coverings (masks if you wish) are equal and totally a single , unified variable. I find this to be erroneous and a simplistic approach to the data collection. Far better to break out the data in several categories representing the top several types/ classes of masks on use. Also need separate break-out of vaccinated (complete regimen as stated by manufacturer) vs. non-vaccinated AND further broken down as to which vaccine was administered.
Without such break-out data conclusions drawn may be, at best, misleading. End result is quite likely to be quite erroneous conclusions about the REAL results of the study. Bad data or poorly reported data is no better than having never initiated an investigation .
Masks are masks, according to Dr. Fauci, CDC, and other science “fact checkers”.The data seem to consider ALL face coverings (masks if you wish) are equal and totally a single , unified variable. I find this to be erroneous and a simplistic approach to the data collection. Far better to break out the data in several categories representing the top several types/ classes of masks on use. Also need separate break-out of vaccinated (complete regimen as stated by manufacturer) vs. non-vaccinated AND further broken down as to which vaccine was administered.
Without such break-out data conclusions drawn may be, at best, misleading. End result is quite likely to be quite erroneous conclusions about the REAL results of the study. Bad data or poorly reported data is no better than having never initiated an investigation .
ExactlyNobody is mandating N95 masks though...so what is the point?
Haha truth hurt…. DummyLol, at least mine isn’t covered in face diapers. Is it prevent covid or to cover up that ugly mug? Libtards are so cliche
So which is it? Why can’t you ever answer a question?Haha truth hurt…. Dummy
Wouldnt know i havent worn a mask in a while….So which is it? Why can’t you ever answer a question?
Wouldnt know i havent worn a mask in a while….
Haha… ok…. You got me again. Like I believe that. You’re one of the biggest pussies on here.
That’s what it’s here for. Lighten up Francis. It was deliberate. I knew Johnny Virus would take the bait.And......this thread has turned in to a 3rd grade pissing contest.
I never said you were fat. You are the one talking about being fat.Yep…. Im soooo fat…. Lol
I venture a guess that you have no idea what it is that I wrote.Nobody is mandating N95 masks though...so what is the point?