Once again... a Democrat with a brain gets it.

[Mntneer]

Another follow up interview with Tulsi.

 

[polar80]

Very smart lady! Would make a great President. One of the very few Democrats, that I would vote for.

 

[WVUCOOPER]

Another follow up interview with Tulsi.

It’s astonishing how butthurt you are over private companies making decisions. :joy::joy:

 

[rog1187]

It’s astonishing how butthurt you are over private companies making decisions. :joy::joy:

^^^^ is fine with suppression of speech ^^^^

 

[wvu2007]

^^^^ is fine with suppression of speech ^^^^

They don't call him Chicom Coop for nothing

 

[WVUCOOPER]

^^^^ is fine with suppression of speech ^^^^

^^^^ Loves communism^^^^^

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

^^^^ Loves communism^^^^^

^^^^loves the D^^^^

 

[GrimReaper82]

I stopped at Democrat with a brain

 

[WVUCOOPER]

^^^^loves the D cups^^^^

Well that's true. Busted I guess. (No pun intended)

 

[rog1187]

^^^^ Loves communism^^^^^

^^^ fascist ^^^

 

[WVUCOOPER]

^^^ fascist ^^^

^^^^ pro regulation commie swallower ^^^^^

 

[wvu2007]

Today is the day that twitter plans to remove all brown users from their platform. All whites only from now on.

 

[rog1187]

^^^^ pro regulation commie swallower ^^^^^

^^^ is in favor of suppressing everything except his love for little boys ^^^

 

[wvu2007]

 

[WVUCOOPER]

^^^ is in favor of suppressing everything except his love for little boys ^^^

^^^ rapes boys and fetuses ^^^^

 

[rog1187]

^^^ rapes boys and fetuses ^^^^

^^^ is okay with killing the unborn as well as molesting collies ^^^

 

[jpoppa]

Crazy these companies are more powerful than our Government. We may as well get rid of Government and kneel to our big tech demigods

 

[mule_eer]

It’s astonishing how butthurt you are over private companies making decisions. :joy::joy:

Making these sorts of moves could be counter productive to their profitability though. If they set themselves as censors, are they a platform that is not responsible for content posted or a publisher who is.

 

[Mntneer]

Making these sorts of moves could be counter productive to their profitability though. If they set themselves as censors, are they a platform that is not responsible for content posted or a publisher who is.

The selective nature of their censors makes them publishers IMO.

Private companies (especially non-monopolies) are free to make all the decisions they see fit, as long as they fall within the bounds of the law.

 

[WVUCOOPER]

Making these sorts of moves could be counter productive to their profitability though. If they set themselves as censors, are they a platform that is not responsible for content posted or a publisher who is.

Are they setting themselves as a censor or enforcing their TOS?

Profit affects is between the board and shareholders.

 

[cam_blev]

Making these sorts of moves could be counter productive to their profitability though. If they set themselves as censors, are they a platform that is not responsible for content posted or a publisher who is.

I agree if they are responsible for everything that is posted on their site and not taken down they will be sued pretty quickly.
Their algorithm in itself that is designed to get people emotional also comes into question.

 

[atlkvb]

They don't call him Chicom Coop for nothing

See it's his Conservative principles that keep him from worrying about speech suppression. He can always keep his Conservative views to himself and no one will ever suppress them.

It's actually when he tells congenital lies about being Conservative he has to worry. [eyeroll]

 

[dave]

Making these sorts of moves could be counter productive to their profitability though. If they set themselves as censors, are they a platform that is not responsible for content posted or a publisher who is.

Thar is the gist of the argument. Are they a purely private company if they are reliant on a govt shield to protect them from liability?