Olive Branch
- Thread starter countryroads89_rivals
- Start date
What for exactly? Patriotism? Believing America first in foreign relations? Being Pro Life? Rebuilding the US economy? Protecting religious freedoms? Enforcing the law? Supporting the police? Adhering to the US constitution? Requiring legalized immigration?
Give him a chance to check in with CNN first. You don't expect him to be able to think for himself now, do you?
make america white again, supporting the police even if they do kill someone, being pro birth not pro life, economy was on an upward trend( injected it with a business tax cut), adhering to the US Constitution when it fits your narrative and legalized immigration unless big business needs cheap labor.
With all due respect.... if we were to carve out of the
GOP all racists and white supremacists/nationalists ..
... there'd be hardly anybody left.
The party is loaded with a bunch of angry white
guys like airport who are seething with hate for
all minorities.
The Mod is the problem. He’s enabled and facilitated the MAGA insults and Disruptions. He has a long history of unethical behavior. He has no academic pedigree or national success , He operates a struggling computer repair operations in bumfcked hick NC town yet moderates a political board through biased uneducated maga lenses ? That’s why this board is a $hitShow. That’s who the mod is - and his maga posee - all of which group email and message to intentionally disrupt upgraded political discourse.
This forum could be upgraded and foster tremendous value - For liberals , Democrats, Centrists, Independents, Moderates, Republicans, and Conservatives.
Can you provide that information as factual? Make America white? Give me examples. Every part of your post is a lie and based on your false interpretation and emotions .
what part of my post is a lie? Trying to subvert the Constitution? Not working to stop police violence? GOP turning their back as big businesses and Agri Companies use illegal immigrant labor? Ignoring your intel people when they tell you white supremacist groups are a problem? Too much Newsmax in your house.
You enable and support exactly what Kazzman communicated. You’re complicit. Either you’re too inexperienced at politics, oblivious, or intentionally self absorbed lacking awareness or empathy toward discriminated groups.
I honest don’t care what your deficiency is, but it’s clear you have a massive deficiency.
Last edited:
You made the statements, now back them up. I wanna see where MAGA is making America white again. Show me the link with factual evidence Trump said it. Show me where Trump supported police criminal behavior.
Why can't Trump admit that white hate groups are a problem? His FBI and NSA has no problem saying it. He has a big issue with BLM. Funny, you must agree with everything else. This is what struck a nerve.
Actually he’s condemned those hate groups many times. Maybe you need to research your “news” and not rely on msm. I agree with what exactly? Emotions again for you?
Just like a true Republican......Idiots on the hill are telling Biden to prove that he won the election......roflmao.
Not condemn....work to eradicate them and arrest them like he has pushed for groups like BLM.
All hate groups need to be eradicated.....if you preach violence, you need to be put out of your misery.
Yes all hate groups need eradicated. Including those in your party. So stop dodging. Back up your claims bud. You’re getting embarrassed
I'm game...really wish we could discuss issues. Like this looming Constitutional scrum over who sets election Law in the States?
which claim? That Trump wanted to do an executive order on Birth Right Citizenship and circumvent the Constitution?
I think what's needed more than anything else in this country is a consensus on what is correct, what works best, what is true, and most importantly what is the alternative if we all can't agree on those common sense answers?
Texas is simply arguing that if State Legislatures aren't the final arbiters of their own Laws, then no States are secure. States joining that filing agree.
Agreed. It's not good give and take, and I doubt many of us talk to colleagues or acquaintances the way we address fellow Mountaineers on this forum.
SCOTUS may agree with that premise. But they may ask why it wan't brought up before the election. They will not reverse the election......that is 0% chance
like why the GOP will not push for e-verify? Or when a child is born, it's on it's own. Be damned if that family needs assistance or the child needs healthcare. But they do hope it grows up to be a soldier so they can send him/her to die somewhere. The GOP is for one thing.....Business.
That was tied to anchor babies, illegals coming across the border and spitting kids out of their cvnts to capitalize and abuse DACA. It was actually creating a market for the cartels with pregnant women.
Your talking points don’t apply to Trump. Maybe the Romney GOP, but Trump was the opposite of what you’re saying.
Why not push to stop the Russian women coming over here and spitting out babies in Florida? But that is still not following the constitution.
Agreed the SUPCO won't "reverse" the election. That's not their role. They will however re-direct the States to settle the dispute over these ballots as proscribed by the Constitution. That means ordering them to appoint their electors to decide it, and short of that allowing Congress to convene and settle the issue as directed by their State Legislatures.
That's not Trump, the RNC, the DNC, or Biden. That's the Constitution. Article 12. Everyone should read it.